One of many bad choices, most here pointed out by those that did vote for the one or are left of myself: Flawed Science Advice for Obama? - TierneyLab Blog - NYTimes.com
Did you really think that the left most of which see the non issue of global warming - there is a web sight in Czechoslovakian that demonstrates with some interesting math that we have already achieve about 785% of the warming possible from CO2 and that is only around 1 degree celsius - as there main chance to establish an even more powerful and intrusive government than they have thus far yet managed.
Dr. Holdren is an absolute idiot. He epitomizes the word 'Libtard' because he remains arrogant and condescending long after he's been proven wrong. He sounds like a great choice for Obama's administration.
I am not sure what we are supposed to not blame you for. Are you anticipating something bad happening? Or are you saying something bad has already happened?
The choices that Obama has made from the scientific community get high marks from me. Dr. Chu, and Dr. Lubchenko are excellent choices, and we will see real scientists reporting science without the filter of the political hacks that Bush appointed.
Nice partisan spin. Given the last eight years, you people are so afraid that Obama may well turn out to be an excellent President. Just the contrast with his ability to speak to that of Bush's has to be a severe embarrassment to you fellows.
I hope he does turn out to be an excellent president, but i'm from Missouri.... I'm embarrassed because Obama can ( allegedly ) read a teleprompter better than Bush ? I hope everyone in all 57 states realizes this. How about, you're a kool aid drinking baffoon for taking so much pride in the fact that Obama ( allegedly ) is better speaker than Bush....
No, I suspect what is really happening is something we see in human nature. People who are liars assume everyone lies. Theives think everyone else is a theif. And political partisans assume everyone is as partisan as they are.