Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
For once in your life, just answer a simple question.
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
True or False?
American Intelligence states with high confidence that Russians were interfering in 2016 election.
As we probably are somewhere in the World, ALL Nations do it, but it was not to the extent poor Hillary made out. But 17 agencies did NOT conclude that Russia hacked anything. Obama himself said it COULDN'T be "hacked".
Again, a counterfactual.
American Intelligence believes with high confidence that Russians hacked DNC under direct orders from Kremlin.
Why do you keep saying blatently false things?
January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment
On January 6, 2017, after briefing the president, the president-elect, and members of the Senate and House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a de-classified version of the report on Russian activities.[2] The report, produced by the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and the ODNI, asserted that Russia had carried out a massive cyber operation ordered by Russian President Putin with the goal to sabotage the 2016 U.S. elections.
17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid
Do try and keep up boy.
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
Clapper testified under oath that only three agencies made the conclusion. No matter what you WANT to believe.
Dummy, tt's not number of Agencies, Coast Guard would have NOTHING to do with this matter.
17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid
For once in your life, just answer a simple question.
"NO, your honor, I just shot my wife THREE times instead of 17 times like the prosecution alleges.....therefore I must be innocent, correct?"
You moronic right wingers should just go play with yourselves while looking at Trump's naked ass.
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
True or False?
American Intelligence states with high confidence that Russians were interfering in 2016 election.
[
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
True or False?
American Intelligence states with high confidence that Russians were interfering in 2016 election.
Only three agencies agreed that Russia "meddled". The Ukrainians " meddled ". Many politicians globally "meddled" Many media outlets world wide "meddled".
The US meddles all the time in foreign elections. Well that's when America isn't actively participating in overthrowing governments and leaders militarily.
Much ado about absolutely nothing...investigation has really bogged down ehIf one "chooses" to believe that Russia did NOT interfere or meddle in our electoral processes, then NONE of the accusations against Trump will have any validity.
Like it or not, ALL of our intelligence agencies have confirmed that the Russians DID meddle.....and we must now acknowledge whether our intelligence agencies are corrupt, inept and partisan or not.
Of course, one can see the why Trump refuses to do anything about this important issue since such an admission would place a "cloud" upon the legitimacy of his win in 2016.......and, after all, we all also know that for Trump, it is his ego that comes before anything....including the safety of our country's electoral systems.
So, it may be time to take a side.........Should we, COLLECTIVELY, demand that energetic methods be employed to stop or curb the influences of Russian meddling in our democratic electoral processes?.........................Yes or No?
Now it is factual.American Intelligence believes withhighconfidence that Russians hacked DNC under direct orders from Kremlin.
If one "chooses" to believe that Russia did NOT interfere or meddle in our electoral processes, then NONE of the accusations against Trump will have any validity.
Like it or not, ALL of our intelligence agencies have confirmed that the Russians DID meddle.....and we must now acknowledge whether our intelligence agencies are corrupt, inept and partisan or not.
Of course, one can see the why Trump refuses to do anything about this important issue since such an admission would place a "cloud" upon the legitimacy of his win in 2016.......and, after all, we all also know that for Trump, it is his ego that comes before anything....including the safety of our country's electoral systems.
So, it may be time to take a side.........Should we, COLLECTIVELY, demand that energetic methods be employed to stop or curb the influences of Russian meddling in our democratic electoral processes?.........................Yes or No?
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
True or False?
American Intelligence states with high confidence that Russians were interfering in 2016 election.
As we probably are somewhere in the World, ALL Nations do it, but it was not to the extent poor Hillary made out. But 17 agencies did NOT conclude that Russia hacked anything. Obama himself said it COULDN'T be "hacked".
Again, a counterfactual.
American Intelligence believes with high confidence that Russians hacked DNC under direct orders from Kremlin.
Why do you keep saying blatently false things?
January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment
On January 6, 2017, after briefing the president, the president-elect, and members of the Senate and House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a de-classified version of the report on Russian activities.[2] The report, produced by the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and the ODNI, asserted that Russia had carried out a massive cyber operation ordered by Russian President Putin with the goal to sabotage the 2016 U.S. elections.
17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid
[
"In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies – the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency – and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment."
New York Times, Associated Press Correct Claims that All 17 Intelligence Agencies Agreed on Russian Interference
True or False?
American Intelligence states with high confidence that Russians were interfering in 2016 election.
Only three agencies agreed that Russia "meddled". The Ukrainians " meddled ". Many politicians globally "meddled" Many media outlets world wide "meddled".
The US meddles all the time in foreign elections. Well that's when America isn't actively participating in overthrowing governments and leaders militarily.
Not to mention that their Messiah tried to unseat Netanyahu.
Actually, I don't believe they stated clearly that it was the DNC server.Now it is factual.American Intelligence believes withhighconfidence that Russians hacked DNC under direct orders from Kremlin.
For once in your life, just answer a simple question.
"NO, your honor, I just shot my wife THREE times instead of 17 times like the prosecution alleges.....therefore I must be innocent, correct?"
You moronic right wingers should just go play with yourselves while looking at Trump's naked ass.
For once in your life, just answer a simple question.
"NO, your honor, I just shot my wife THREE times instead of 17 times like the prosecution alleges.....therefore I must be innocent, correct?"
You moronic right wingers should just go play with yourselves while looking at Trump's naked ass.
Jesus, what are you, like 6? You do realize that you are a complete joke... right?
For once in your life, just answer a simple question.
"NO, your honor, I just shot my wife THREE times instead of 17 times like the prosecution alleges.....therefore I must be innocent, correct?"
You moronic right wingers should just go play with yourselves while looking at Trump's naked ass.
Jesus, what are you, like 6? You do realize that you are a complete joke... right?
No, he actually thinks he is a genius. Just ask him.
Not to mention that their Messiah tried to unseat Netanyahu.
Not to mention that their Messiah tried to unseat Netanyahu.
....and Obama was 100% correct......lol
Attorney-General: I will indict Benjamin Netanyahu without hesitation if ...
www.jpost.com/.../Attorney-General-I-will-indict-Netanyahu-without-hesitation-if-nec...
3 hours ago - If he must indict Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he will do it without hesitation, Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit said on Thursday night, two days after the country was turned upside down by the possibility of another prime minister on trial. Speaking at a conference at Tel Aviv University, he said ...
Let's see if we have this straight. You seem to be arguing that Trump defeated Hillary because Russians convinced Rupublicans to vote against her. That seems kind of dumb, almost like what a democrat would say.
That's exactly what happened. Plenty of Republicans voted for Obama, but then they retreated to their echo chambers where Russia was lurking, ready to hack those mushy brains.
Unless Trump tries it?
When has he tried diplomacy? Being a Russian kompromat isn't diplomacy. Trump won't even impose sanctions on Russia for meddling in the election. Gee, I wonder why...
Naïve liberals? DURR.
Yes, liberals should have known better than to trust Conservatives, be they Bush or Putin. Lesson learned. It's exactly the reason why we don't trust you today. But at least they weren't conned by Russian propaganda and a reality TV show host like you.
I never solicited any foreign assistance to influence the election (unlike some libs, eh?).And how did such brain hacks cause liberal voters to vote for Trump or not vote at all?
You have proof liberal voters voted for Trump? Interesting. Show me that proof. It sounds to me like you are trying to pretend that it wasn't Conservatives who voted for Obama, then whose brains were turned to mush by Conservative politicians and Fox news. Because that's what happened. Sounds like you're trying to abscond responsibility and accountability for supporting, disseminating, and sharing Russian propaganda on social media and these boards. And no, you don't get to skirt away from responsibility for enlisting the help of Russia in the election. Not when you were on these boards arguing from Russian propaganda against Clinton. But again, being Conservative means you have an entitlement complex.
And my vote wasn't going to be for Hillary, Bernie or any other crusty old commie your side barfs up.So what was your point again?
That you love Russia and Putin. You said you didn't before, but I doubt your sincerity there.
I vote against Hillary, no con.
You voted against her, why? Because Russian propaganda hacked your brain, which was already turned to mush by Conservatism. You sure seem to fall for a lot of conmen and charlatans. Your intuition and instincts aren't all they're cracked up to be, obviously. I mean you supported Bush the Dumber, you supported Palin, you supported teabags, you support Russia...not the greatest track record there.
II'll let you know how my larger paycheck feels tomorrow. Go Trump!!!
LOL! Your "larger" paycheck won't make up for the increase to your health care costs that the tax cut caused by removing the mandate. And wait a second - why are you pretending you even draw a paycheck?
Is that why the Dems lost 63 seats in 2010? Those Republicans realized their error?
1. Obama wasn't running in 2010.
2. They voted against Obama because Conservatives lied about Obamacare, and continue to lie about it today.
Interesting the impact they had on young Bernie! voters though.
Young Bernie voters didn't vote for Trump. In fact, Trump got the lowest share of voters (37%) age 18-29 ever.
Bernie voters came around to Hillary? Link?And why would Bernie's young and ignorant (but then I repeat myself) voters dislike Russia?
Bernie voters didn't vote for Trump. Trump got the lowest share of the 18-29 vote ever. If only Millennials had voted, Clinton would have won the election with 55% of the vote. And I find it curious you ask for a link (usually a clue that your argument is about to fall apart), yet you never provide links for anything you claim...like these supposed liberal voters who voted for Trump. All we have is your word. Why the fuck should I trust your word when you openly and happily admit to supporting Russian propaganda efforts in the election?
ou keep using this word hacking. I do not think it means what you think it means.
You're trying to parse the word because you cannot deny that Russia meddled in the election, hacked your brain which was already mushy and goopy from 40 years of Conservative lies.
She really needs to be locked up. Treason is serious. She paid Steele for a dossier he admitted came from Russian intelligence. She knew exactly what she was doing.First up, stop buying info from Russian intelligence. Bad Hillary, bad.
that's amusing...
