Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Now they want Rosenstein impeached the guy who just got 12 indictments Sometimes it's difficult telling Repubs from their russian pals
Eddie, you're dumb as dogshit, but less pleasant to be around.
Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada indicted 13 Russian nationalists 6 months ago. So what happened with those? Why were the indictments dismissed? Oh, because the Russians called the scumbag Inquisitors bluff and went to court? Yep, Torquemada never expected them to actually defend themselves, in fact the corrupt fucker was indicting companies that didn't even exist - basically pulling names out of the phonebook. Corrupt pile of shit that Mewler is.
So you Stalinist pigs had a bad week last week, flat out traitor Strzok may be immune to our laws, but made for VERY bad optics, partly because of his contempt and clear position as an elite not subject to law.
The Inquisition suffered a black eye, so Torquemada threw a hail mary to try and distract from the disaster. He indicted 12 Russians on the same gamble, hoping they will not stand up forthemselves
I mean, what would the corrupt fuck do if they show up and say "let's see the evidence?"
He'll do what he did when he was caught fucking the dog with the 13 Russians, he will dismiss and depend on the corrupt press to sweep it under the rug.
Some maybe. Others, like myself, recognize that this nonsense is counterproductive. No one is going to jail because they were online trolls. They will never be brought to justice making this a big damn waste of my tax dollars. Also of note is the hypocrisy of Americans who ignore the fact that WE DO THIS VERY SAME SHIT TO OTHER NATIONSA few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
This isn't about "trolls."
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
But because the Republican candidate unexpectedly won - and that candidate is deified almost as a God by his base - Republicans are attacking the people who are investigating those who attacked our country.
A year ago, Trump's worshippers were saying that Russia didn't attack us, that this was all #fakenews. They aren't saying that anymore. Or at least most of them aren't.
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
It was awful!! Foreigners reminding voters about Hillary's corruption. Bad foreigners!!
Some maybe. Others, like myself, recognize that this nonsense is counterproductive. No one is going to jail because they were online trolls. They will never be brought to justice making this a big damn waste of my tax dollars. Also of note is the hypocrisy of Americans who ignore the fact that WE DO THIS VERY SAME SHIT TO OTHER NATIONSA few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
This isn't about "trolls."
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
But because the Republican candidate unexpectedly won - and that candidate is deified almost as a God by his base - Republicans are attacking the people who are investigating those who attacked our country.
A year ago, Trump's worshippers were saying that Russia didn't attack us, that this was all #fakenews. They aren't saying that anymore. Or at least most of them aren't.
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
It was awful!! Foreigners reminding voters about Hillary's corruption. Bad foreigners!!
Yes, because Putin’s goal was to expose Hillary.
Did/do Republicans like General Mc Masters? & the National Security Strategy written under him? please reply am interested.
here is what it said.... Russia & China want economies less free, less fair, grow there militaries, control information to expand there influence, repress there people.
Why is Trump so pro Russia? why does he believe Putin?
REALLY like your thoughts on this.
The 80s called...A few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
The average age of Trump’s base is 80
and senileThe 80s called...A few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
The average age of Trump’s base is 80
Did/do Republicans like General Mc Masters? & the National Security Strategy written under him? please reply am interested.
here is what it said.... Russia & China want economies less free, less fair, grow there militaries, control information to expand there influence, repress there people.
Why is Trump so pro Russia? why does he believe Putin?
REALLY like your thoughts on this.
Hillary is 80.
Some maybe. Others, like myself, recognize that this nonsense is counterproductive. No one is going to jail because they were online trolls. They will never be brought to justice making this a big damn waste of my tax dollars. Also of note is the hypocrisy of Americans who ignore the fact that WE DO THIS VERY SAME SHIT TO OTHER NATIONSA few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
This isn't about "trolls."
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
But because the Republican candidate unexpectedly won - and that candidate is deified almost as a God by his base - Republicans are attacking the people who are investigating those who attacked our country.
A year ago, Trump's worshippers were saying that Russia didn't attack us, that this was all #fakenews. They aren't saying that anymore. Or at least most of them aren't.
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
It was awful!! Foreigners reminding voters about Hillary's corruption. Bad foreigners!!
Yes, because Putin’s goal was to expose Hillary.
Putin's goal is to cause divisions and conflict within the U.S. The Dems have played right into his hand.
A few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
None of those have anything to do with the goals of the investigation.
Mueller could have achieved the same results if he chose four random people out of the telephone book to investigate.
Some maybe. Others, like myself, recognize that this nonsense is counterproductive. No one is going to jail because they were online trolls. They will never be brought to justice making this a big damn waste of my tax dollars. Also of note is the hypocrisy of Americans who ignore the fact that WE DO THIS VERY SAME SHIT TO OTHER NATIONS
This isn't about "trolls."
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
But because the Republican candidate unexpectedly won - and that candidate is deified almost as a God by his base - Republicans are attacking the people who are investigating those who attacked our country.
A year ago, Trump's worshippers were saying that Russia didn't attack us, that this was all #fakenews. They aren't saying that anymore. Or at least most of them aren't.
A foreign government attacked our democratic institutions in an attempt to damage our country.
It was awful!! Foreigners reminding voters about Hillary's corruption. Bad foreigners!!
Yes, because Putin’s goal was to expose Hillary.
Putin's goal is to cause divisions and conflict within the U.S. The Dems have played right into his hand.
Democrats and liberals aren't smart enough to figure that out. There is no way (or at least extremely difficult) to hack a US Presidential election.
Putin isn't stupid or crazy enough to attack an election. So Putin "attacked our election system" just enough to "cause doubt".
With the "attacking of the DNC and Hillary's server" Democrat voters are stupid if they think that Russia was the only one who attacked the servers. If Russia knew how weak or no existant the security was everyone else knew too and also attacked them
Hillary is 80.
And I always thought you were good at math ...
A few years ago, Republicans would hammer Democrats for being soft on countries who attacked America.
Today they rationalize it.
Um, just going to point out the Russia, Russia, Russia thing happened during democrats watch.
Now they want Rosenstein impeached the guy who just got 12 indictments Sometimes it's difficult telling Repubs from their russian pals
Eddie, you're dumb as dogshit, but less pleasant to be around.
Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada indicted 13 Russian nationalists 6 months ago. So what happened with those? Why were the indictments dismissed? Oh, because the Russians called the scumbag Inquisitors bluff and went to court? Yep, Torquemada never expected them to actually defend themselves, in fact the corrupt fucker was indicting companies that didn't even exist - basically pulling names out of the phonebook. Corrupt pile of shit that Mewler is.
So you Stalinist pigs had a bad week last week, flat out traitor Strzok may be immune to our laws, but made for VERY bad optics, partly because of his contempt and clear position as an elite not subject to law.
The Inquisition suffered a black eye, so Torquemada threw a hail mary to try and distract from the disaster. He indicted 12 Russians on the same gamble, hoping they will not stand up forthemselves
I mean, what would the corrupt fuck do if they show up and say "let's see the evidence?"
He'll do what he did when he was caught fucking the dog with the 13 Russians, he will dismiss and depend on the corrupt press to sweep it under the rug.
Do you have a link to the indictments being dismissed, because court docs says Concord Management and Consulting and the Mueller team are due back in court on Aug. 17.
.
Let me get this right...Putin, a former KGB agent, engaged in espionage. Is that it?
Next thing you know, Disco music will be popular again....
Now they want Rosenstein impeached the guy who just got 12 indictments Sometimes it's difficult telling Repubs from their russian pals
Eddie, you're dumb as dogshit, but less pleasant to be around.
Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada indicted 13 Russian nationalists 6 months ago. So what happened with those? Why were the indictments dismissed? Oh, because the Russians called the scumbag Inquisitors bluff and went to court? Yep, Torquemada never expected them to actually defend themselves, in fact the corrupt fucker was indicting companies that didn't even exist - basically pulling names out of the phonebook. Corrupt pile of shit that Mewler is.
So you Stalinist pigs had a bad week last week, flat out traitor Strzok may be immune to our laws, but made for VERY bad optics, partly because of his contempt and clear position as an elite not subject to law.
The Inquisition suffered a black eye, so Torquemada threw a hail mary to try and distract from the disaster. He indicted 12 Russians on the same gamble, hoping they will not stand up forthemselves
I mean, what would the corrupt fuck do if they show up and say "let's see the evidence?"
He'll do what he did when he was caught fucking the dog with the 13 Russians, he will dismiss and depend on the corrupt press to sweep it under the rug.
Do you have a link to the indictments being dismissed, because court docs says Concord Management and Consulting and the Mueller team are due back in court on Aug. 17.
Report: Mueller's Indictment of Russian Company Is Facing Dismissal Over Legal Incompetence
{
The motion continues, “As such, Count One of the Indictment appears to be facially invalid because it fails to charge an essential element of the offense of conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing and defeating the functions of the FEC and the DOJ, that is, that the Defendant acted willfully, in this case meaning that Defendant was aware of the FEC and FARA requirements, agreed to violate those requirements, and ultimately acted with intent to violate those requirements.”
Concord Management’s Monday motion contains at least one reference to U.S. case law where similar indictments were dismissed because they failed to adequately track statutory language. In other words, Concord Management is arguing that Mueller and his army of attorneys charged Concord Management (and other Russian entities) with a vague-sounding “crime” that isn’t actually a crime.
In fact, Concord Management’s motion explicitly says as much, claiming, “[T]he DOJ never brought any case like the instant Indictment, that is, an alleged conspiracy by a foreign corporation to ‘interfere’ in a Presidential election by allegedly funding free speech. The obvious reason for this is that no such crime exists in the federal criminal code.”
Because Mueller’s indictment was apparently sloppy (or intentionally vague) in this regard, Concord Management is asking the court to inspect the language of the grand jury instructions–with the hope that the court agrees the indictment actually failed to include all of the elements of the crime charged. As the motion notes, under U.S. law, indictments must contain all such elements.}
Um, just going to point out the Russia, Russia, Russia thing happened during democrats watch.
