Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hullo Mary--you do know that the op is a Senate report..a Republican led report...that you are calling a lie.There's OP, there's Zuckerborg, and then there's the truth.
Russian operatives used Facebook ads to exploit America’s racial and religious divisions
Seen any of these before? You may have been targeted by Russian ads on Facebook
Ads actually posted by Russians with proof. Not the bullshit puked onto this page by OP.
"
"Support Hillary. Save American Muslims!" event
One ad promoted a "Support Hillary - Save American Muslims" event that was set for outside the White House on July 9, 2016.
That ad was targeted at people who had expressed an interest in Hillary Clinton or the Muslim Brotherhood on Facebook and who lived in Washington, DC."
"
"Trump is NOT my President" event
On the morning after Election Day 2016, the Russian page "Black Matters," which was designed to look like a black activist group, began promoting a "Trump is NOT my president" event, to take place at New York City's Union Square.
The ad was targeted at people living in New York, according to the release from the House Intelligence Committee, which does not specify whether it means New York State or New York City."
OP can go fuck himself with his lying. Dishonest shill.
Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.Answer my question.Answer the question, retard.Fuck you bitch.
Oh yeah..the question..what possible bearing this would have on this report..I don't know...I doubt that any Libs voted for Trump. So?
Any comment on the now proven fact..that Russia tried to influence our election on the direct orders of Putin? That Putin wished Trump to win...and used espionage to attempt to ensure it?
When I ask a Liberals this to their face, their heads start going into spasms.
How many people were wrongfully convinced that Clinton should be in prison? I mean, besides you who believed the bullshit.
The Russians were a great echo chamber.
I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
Hullo Mary--you do know that the op is a Senate report..a Republican led report...that you are calling a lie.There's OP, there's Zuckerborg, and then there's the truth.
Russian operatives used Facebook ads to exploit America’s racial and religious divisions
Seen any of these before? You may have been targeted by Russian ads on Facebook
Ads actually posted by Russians with proof. Not the bullshit puked onto this page by OP.
"
"Support Hillary. Save American Muslims!" event
One ad promoted a "Support Hillary - Save American Muslims" event that was set for outside the White House on July 9, 2016.
That ad was targeted at people who had expressed an interest in Hillary Clinton or the Muslim Brotherhood on Facebook and who lived in Washington, DC."
"
"Trump is NOT my President" event
On the morning after Election Day 2016, the Russian page "Black Matters," which was designed to look like a black activist group, began promoting a "Trump is NOT my president" event, to take place at New York City's Union Square.
The ad was targeted at people living in New York, according to the release from the House Intelligence Committee, which does not specify whether it means New York State or New York City."
OP can go fuck himself with his lying. Dishonest shill.
This is where you're retarded. The OP is based on a Washington Post article.
Silly rabbit..you don't even know who i voted for..***hint*** it wasn't Trump..and it wasn't Clinton.oh I believe you, no really I do, we all do, seriously, no kidding...it it isn't odd or even crazy to ROTFL at something so hilarious as avoiding your report, that's good hobby to have, really it is...that's completely normal, shows no signs of still hurting from the 2016 election, seriously.Nah..I'm having fun here. Seeing how many ways there are to avoid addressing the report..the Republican led report.
You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.Answer my question.Answer the question, retard.
When I ask a Liberals this to their face, their heads start going into spasms.
How many people were wrongfully convinced that Clinton should be in prison? I mean, besides you who believed the bullshit.
The Russians were a great echo chamber.
I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
Silly rabbit..you don't even know who i voted for..***hint*** it wasn't Trump..and it wasn't Clinton.oh I believe you, no really I do, we all do, seriously, no kidding...it it isn't odd or even crazy to ROTFL at something so hilarious as avoiding your report, that's good hobby to have, really it is...that's completely normal, shows no signs of still hurting from the 2016 election, seriously.Nah..I'm having fun here. Seeing how many ways there are to avoid addressing the report..the Republican led report.
As for odd hobbies..we're all here..now aren't we?
I just did, moron.That doesn't even make any sense..care to comment on the report?So how many weak minded Liberals do you know that voted for Trump?
None?
Thought so.
Answer the question.
Fuck you bitch.
Oh yeah..the question..what possible bearing this would have on this report..I don't know...I doubt that any Libs voted for Trump. So?
Any comment on the now proven fact..that Russia tried to influence our election on the direct orders of Putin? That Putin wished Trump to win...and used espionage to attempt to ensure it?
Russia favored Trump in 2016, Senate panel says, breaking with House GOP
That's right. The ENTIRE Senate Committee chaired by the GOP agrees with the US Intelligence Committee, breaking from trump. The House Intel Committee did not issue a joint report. Rather, the GOP on that committee issued a memo in which they tried to appease Glorious Leader.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.f6cee7d89592
Quote:
“Our staff concluded that the [intelligence community’s] conclusions were accurate and on point,” the panel’s vice chairman, Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), said Wednesday in a joint statement with Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), its chairman. “The Russian effort was extensive, sophisticated, and ordered by President Putin himself for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton,” Warner continued.
But that last determination — that Russia intended to help Trump — sets up a clash within the GOP over which record of events is most accurate, a dispute that could complicate the party’s messaging surrounding the Russia investigations as it heads into the 2018 election season. While the House Republicans’ report also concurred with the bulk of the intelligence community’s findings about Russian meddling, it accused officials of not following their own best practices in determining that Moscow hoped Trump would win."
Trump has taken umbrage at the intelligence community’s determination that the Kremlin favored his candidacy over that of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The president cheered the House Intelligence Committee’s findings and report on Twitter, claiming it vindicated him by finding there was no evidence of collusion or coordination with Russia.
The Senate intelligence panel has yet to weigh in on the collusion allegations, a subject that will be left to its final report. But Burr and Warner have been dropping hints for days that their panel’s interim findings on the intelligence community would depart from those of the House Intelligence Committee Republicans. House Democrats also roundly disagreed with those findings.
FILE In this file photo taken on Friday, July 7, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany. The Senate Intelligence Committee released its findings on Wednesday that the Russia had interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump’s chances of victory, breaking with House Republicans. (Evan Vucci/AP)
“I’m not sure that the House was required to substantiate every conclusion with facts,” Burr told reporters last week, when asked whether the Senate Intelligence Committee would also find fault with the intelligence community’s assessment. He promised the Senate panel would “have the facts to show for” its conclusions."
***OUCH***
and we all believe youSilly rabbit..you don't even know who i voted for..***hint*** it wasn't Trump..and it wasn't Clinton.
you find posting on a message board odd? you've been under the spell of fake news for so long you may have dyslexic comprehension filters from it.As for odd hobbies..we're all here..now aren't we?
I just posted the news..you seem to be a bit..upset about the Republican led conclusion.who's the butthurt one screamin RUSSIA again?ROTFLMAO! Yup..an official Senate report..led by Republicans..is fake news. Thank you for that laugh..i needed it.fake newsRussia favored Trump in 2016, Senate panel says, breaking with House GOP
That's right. The ENTIRE Senate Committee chaired by the GOP agrees with the US Intelligence Committee, breaking from trump. The House Intel Committee did not issue a joint report. Rather, the GOP on that committee issued a memo in which they tried to appease Glorious Leader.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.f6cee7d89592
Quote:
“Our staff concluded that the [intelligence community’s] conclusions were accurate and on point,” the panel’s vice chairman, Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), said Wednesday in a joint statement with Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), its chairman. “The Russian effort was extensive, sophisticated, and ordered by President Putin himself for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton,” Warner continued.
But that last determination — that Russia intended to help Trump — sets up a clash within the GOP over which record of events is most accurate, a dispute that could complicate the party’s messaging surrounding the Russia investigations as it heads into the 2018 election season. While the House Republicans’ report also concurred with the bulk of the intelligence community’s findings about Russian meddling, it accused officials of not following their own best practices in determining that Moscow hoped Trump would win."
Trump has taken umbrage at the intelligence community’s determination that the Kremlin favored his candidacy over that of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The president cheered the House Intelligence Committee’s findings and report on Twitter, claiming it vindicated him by finding there was no evidence of collusion or coordination with Russia.
The Senate intelligence panel has yet to weigh in on the collusion allegations, a subject that will be left to its final report. But Burr and Warner have been dropping hints for days that their panel’s interim findings on the intelligence community would depart from those of the House Intelligence Committee Republicans. House Democrats also roundly disagreed with those findings.
FILE In this file photo taken on Friday, July 7, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany. The Senate Intelligence Committee released its findings on Wednesday that the Russia had interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump’s chances of victory, breaking with House Republicans. (Evan Vucci/AP)
“I’m not sure that the House was required to substantiate every conclusion with facts,” Burr told reporters last week, when asked whether the Senate Intelligence Committee would also find fault with the intelligence community’s assessment. He promised the Senate panel would “have the facts to show for” its conclusions."
***OUCH***
My..the Butt Hurt is strong in Trumpland today!
oh yea. you.
You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.Answer my question.How many people were wrongfully convinced that Clinton should be in prison? I mean, besides you who believed the bullshit.
The Russians were a great echo chamber.
I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Ads are part of the Free Market.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.Answer my question.
I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.Answer my question.
I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
Ads are part of the Free Market.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
WTF is wrong with Liberals!!!???
Nice deflection....so...what do you think about the Podesta hacks...or Assange being run by the Russians/Ads are part of the Free Market.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
WTF is wrong with Liberals!!!???
Link to one of these “deceptive” ads.Ads are part of the Free Market.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
WTF is wrong with Liberals!!!???
Deceptive ads from a foreign government, specifically a country like Russia that pretend to be from another group are not part of the free market. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Answer my question.Nice deflection....so...what do you think about the Podesta hacks...or Assange being run by the Russians/Ads are part of the Free Market.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
WTF is wrong with Liberals!!!???
Can you answer without referencing Clinton, Obama or using some other 'look over there, a squirrel' tactic?
You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
And what exactly did the president do about it?
As if you care..just another lame deflection--from a lame troll..who just doesn't have the intellectual horsepower to debate..or the integrity to admit when he's wrong.You have never been particularly bright and you’re really going out of your way to reinforce that impression.Moron, 99% of all people know who they’re voting for...it’s by Party.I think the point is it is unknowable. How many people who voted for Trump weren't influenced by Russians? You don't know the answer, all we do know is YES, the Russians made a serious attempt to elect Donald Trump and you ask a question that obviously there is no known answer to, who knows maybe you're too stupid to know that.
99% of Republicans vote Republican and 99% of Democrats vote Democrat? That sounds iffy at best and I look forward to you proving that.
How about independents?
How about that Trump had razor thin wins in 3 states, how many people would it take to influence? 100k?
I have yet to meet any non-Conservative or Liberal who didn’t vote Party.
Most Independents voted for Trump.
No one I have met in Nassau County voted because of an ad.
Oh yeah, I meet about 2,000 people a year due to work and EVERYONE talks politics.
Who said liberals were convinced to vote for Trump? No one, not a single person has even remotely attempted to make this point.
Ads influence people to vote or even not to vote that is their sole purpose. Politicians and corporations don't spend billions on them every year just to entertain you.
You should be concerned with a foreign enemy of the state attempting to influence our elections, whether you think they are successful or not. Instead what you are obviously doing is putting Trump over country because the last thing you want to admit is that our democracy was threatened and Trump very well may have gotten a boost from the Russians therefore throwing up an additional asterisk (the first for losing the popular vote) for the 2016 election.
And what exactly did the president do about it?
