R's only agenda, anti-Obama

Really?

You're going to be so stupid as to ignore the fact that the stock market seriously crashed during the first months of Obama's presidency?

Do you think that might have had something to do with the uptick in spending?

Are you people so completely incapable of analyzing anything? Ever hear of "cause and effect"?

ah yes, another EXCUSE..

Cause and effect is an EXCUSE?

That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day........

Cause and effect?

Cause and effect, if it actually exists, only happens if their is a direct link between cause A and effect B. I would love to mock anyone who tried to describe a link between a downturn in the stock market and government spending. Please, provide your description of the ink, I haven't found a new person to mock in a few days..
 
rw's never post facts.

Just empty insults.

Pathetic.

like you do?.....how come if someone questions what you post you ignore them?....and dont tell me you dont....you do....and yet you had the balls to accuse rw's of leaving the thread if questioned,something you do quite often....your a fraud Dudley....

My WHAT is a fraud? (WHOOSH! Right over your head!)

I don't actually ignore "replies". I just don't bother to go back to most threads. Reason is, by the second or third page of a given thread, it's just juvenile name calling that doesn't interest me.

Like i said, I dont purposely ignore ALL posts directed to me I'm answering you because I happened to see this.

This reminds me of the early days of Internet forums. If a person spent a lot of time on the forum, they were hassled for not having a life. If they logged off, they were accused of running from a debate.

Fact - there are never debates on most forums, including this one. There are only name-calling sessions.

Please feel free to ignore my posts in the future.
bullshit....you have had people ask you reasonable questions on the first page of your threads and you ignored them,you ignore questions quite often....and then your pathetic excuses start...if you start the threads...ANSWER FUCKING QUESTIONS....

Fact - there are never debates on most forums, including this one. There are only name-calling sessions.

if you think these threads are just name calling sessions....why the hell do you keep posting?...
 
Sure thing. Except for the fact that Cut-N-Run, war criminal, super hypocrite Ronnie Raygun proved in the long run to be much, much worse for the country.

Except, of course, your contention is stupid and wrong.

No it's not. Ronnie cut and ran from Beruit. He illegally set mines in Nicaruagua's harbors. His administration negociated with a terrorist supporting state, Iran, on a deal to sell them US Weapons in exchange for release of Hostages while endorsing legislation to make it a crime to deal with nations who support terrorist, like Iran.

In retrospect, Reagan is only eclisped in the distinction of being the worst president in modern times by President Bush (43).
you do realize thats just your opinion.....and Regan wanted to bomb the the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters but was advised very heavily by Casper Weinbrenner not too....
 
Except, of course, your contention is stupid and wrong.

No it's not. Ronnie cut and ran from Beruit. He illegally set mines in Nicaruagua's harbors. His administration negociated with a terrorist supporting state, Iran, on a deal to sell them US Weapons in exchange for release of Hostages while endorsing legislation to make it a crime to deal with nations who support terrorist, like Iran.

In retrospect, Reagan is only eclisped in the distinction of being the worst president in modern times by President Bush (43).
And Bush said he was not even looking for the terrorist who masterminded the mass murder of more than 3000 people, most of whom were Americans.

The pubs tried to take credit for bin Ladens death and it's true the Navy Seals were responsible for the actual raid but if a pub had been in charge, the research and the order would not have been given. Thank you, Mr President.

Oh and Mitt has said he would not have gone after bin Laden or any of the other terrorists Obams has killed
.

and so have a lot of your fellow Democrats,many right here in this forum....
 
Robert Draper Book: GOP's Anti-Obama Campaign Started Night Of Inauguration

The very night of the inauguration, these anti-Americans were meeting secretly, plotting how to bring down our new president. The old GOP is gone, killed by these vile men, intent on treason and bringing our country to its knees - only so they could funnel money to the wealthiest among us. They have given us in excess of $15TRILLION DOLLARS in debt and have severely threatened our world standing. They are traitors and should be voted out of office.

Astounding to me is that they admitted it, told us they had stopped working for the USA, told us they would do whatever necessary to bring down our president.

It's been obvious from day one that Republican's have no interest in running a country, they are only hell-bent on destroying Obama. This book proves that.

In fact, Republicans are so intent on bringing down Obama, they are willing to bring down the entire country along with it through their abuse of the filibuster, the debt ceiling disaster which downgraded our credit rating and more recently, their incredible reluctance to pass the payroll tax cut extensions for the middle class.

Boehner's crybaby (literally and figuratively) ass is going DOWN this election.
Horse shit! The easiest way to bring the entire country down is to let that Marxist bastard Obama have another 4 years to do it.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.
just Far Left Liberalism.....but so is Far Right Conservatism....thats why they both need to be put down....
 
Yeah, so?

What are those increases as a percent change in NPV terms? If you even know what I'm talking about, you'll see Reagan and Bush Jr. did the worst. But we know math and economics are difficult for many to understand.......

Obama has added more to the national debt in 3 years than Bush did in 8.

Fact.

National Debt has increased more under Obama than under Bush - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

Really?

You're going to be so stupid as to ignore the fact that the stock market seriously crashed during the first months of Obama's presidency?

Do you think that might have had something to do with the uptick in spending?

Are you people so completely incapable of analyzing anything? Ever hear of "cause and effect"?

then how come many on the left dont factor in 9/11 with Bush's economy?....."cause and effect".....
 
Does anyone really want Romney answering the phone in the White House at 3 am?

According to the national polls, about 46% of the population want Romney answering the phone in the White House, at any hour. Thats quite a few anyones.

Can you honestly say that you would trust Obama to handle a national crisis? It took him two weeks to respond to an oil spill.
 
Obama has added more to the national debt in 3 years than Bush did in 8.

Fact.

National Debt has increased more under Obama than under Bush - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

Really?

You're going to be so stupid as to ignore the fact that the stock market seriously crashed during the first months of Obama's presidency?

Do you think that might have had something to do with the uptick in spending?

Are you people so completely incapable of analyzing anything? Ever hear of "cause and effect"?

then how come many on the left dont factor in 9/11 with Bush's economy?....."cause and effect".....

Who says we don't?

That one's pretty obvious to me!
 
Last edited:
Really?

You're going to be so stupid as to ignore the fact that the stock market seriously crashed during the first months of Obama's presidency?

Do you think that might have had something to do with the uptick in spending?

Are you people so completely incapable of analyzing anything? Ever hear of "cause and effect"?

then how come many on the left dont factor in 9/11 with Bush's economy?....."cause and effect".....

Who says we don't?

That one's pretty obvious to me!
it sure as hell aint obvious to a lot of others......some lefty posters here even blamed Bush for it....
 
you do realize thats just your opinion.....and Regan wanted to bomb the the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters but was advised very heavily by Casper Weinbrenner not too....

At the time, we were in a cold war with the Soviet Union. The lines were very distinct. Boo was on the other side. When Reagan stopped Soviet warships from using Nicaraguan ports, he cut off supply lines to the Soviet beachhead. This disrupted the entire Soviet war machine. To someone like boo, this was outrageous. They were so close, there were T-80's and KA-50's in Managua, Honduras was easy prey, then Guatemala, and the prize, Mexico, for the taking. But without a deep water port, the entire invasion was scuttled.

It was a high-stakes game. 5th column guys like boo were sure they had already won. Carter had declared Soviet supremacy in Europe and was disarming US defensive structures. You can't blame boo for thinking he had won.

But then, Reagan.
 
No it's not. Ronnie cut and ran from Beruit. He illegally set mines in Nicaruagua's harbors. His administration negociated with a terrorist supporting state, Iran, on a deal to sell them US Weapons in exchange for release of Hostages while endorsing legislation to make it a crime to deal with nations who support terrorist, like Iran.

In retrospect, Reagan is only eclisped in the distinction of being the worst president in modern times by President Bush (43).
And Bush said he was not even looking for the terrorist who masterminded the mass murder of more than 3000 people, most of whom were Americans.

The pubs tried to take credit for bin Ladens death and it's true the Navy Seals were responsible for the actual raid but if a pub had been in charge, the research and the order would not have been given. Thank you, Mr President.

Oh and Mitt has said he would not have gone after bin Laden or any of the other terrorists Obams has killed.

By the time George W. Bush said that he was not interested in Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden was a totally spent, exhausted and useless force, with even the most faithful of his allies stabbing him in the back, nothing more than a pathetic old fool reduced to watching American produced porn in his hideaway, provided for him by the equally back-stabbing allies of America, the corrupt and sad world-power wannabe sad and pathetic Muslim Pakistan.

The intelligence that located Osama bin Laden were put in place by GWB. So were the forces got close enough to pull the trigger. So were the fingers that pulled the trigger.

GWB was gracious enough to let the glory for the order of pulling the trigger to the most undeserving President. The death of a totally insignificant nobody can benefit only another totally insignificant nobody. So, enjoy, Democrats!

"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

Because at this point the Bush administrations priority was to morph America's outrage of the attacts on 9-11, through the bully pulpit with various lies and misrepresentation, into approval for an invasion an occupation of Iraq.
 
Except, of course, your contention is stupid and wrong.

No it's not. Ronnie cut and ran from Beruit. He illegally set mines in Nicaruagua's harbors. His administration negociated with a terrorist supporting state, Iran, on a deal to sell them US Weapons in exchange for release of Hostages while endorsing legislation to make it a crime to deal with nations who support terrorist, like Iran.

In retrospect, Reagan is only eclisped in the distinction of being the worst president in modern times by President Bush (43).
you do realize thats just your opinion.....and Regan wanted to bomb the the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters but was advised very heavily by Casper Weinbrenner not too....

Even though many Arabs hated the American intervention in Lebanon, it’s important to remember that Reagan’s withdrawal did not result in terrorist attacks in America. It did not result in a spreading takeover of Middle Eastern governments by terrorist groups. What it did was stop further American casualties, and allow for a reduction in military spending.

It was foolish and wrong for Reagan to send American troops into Lebanon, but it was good that Reagan was able to recognize his mistake and withdraw those troops.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, President George W. Bush’s pride and stubbornness prevented him from following Reagan’s example. Unfortunately, President Obama has shown that same pride and stubbornness so far.

http://theswash.com/liberty/time-to-cut-and-run-like-reagan
 
you do realize thats just your opinion.....and Regan wanted to bomb the the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters but was advised very heavily by Casper Weinbrenner not too....

At the time, we were in a cold war with the Soviet Union. The lines were very distinct. Boo was on the other side. When Reagan stopped Soviet warships from using Nicaraguan ports, he cut off supply lines to the Soviet beachhead. This disrupted the entire Soviet war machine. To someone like boo, this was outrageous. They were so close, there were T-80's and KA-50's in Managua, Honduras was easy prey, then Guatemala, and the prize, Mexico, for the taking. But without a deep water port, the entire invasion was scuttled.

It was a high-stakes game. 5th column guys like boo were sure they had already won. Carter had declared Soviet supremacy in Europe and was disarming US defensive structures. You can't blame boo for thinking he had won.

But then, Reagan.

Rabid rightie imagination running wild then and now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top