- Thread starter
- #21
LOLOL.....the fraudulent OP got completely debunked but you are too brainwashed and insane to grasp that fact so you continue to make yourself look like an utter idiot....LOLOL...ahh the little climate denier got his feathers ruffled. Royal Society gave you a tummy ache, nice. Thanks for sharing your loser skills.That is just more fraudulent denier cult propaganda, with very little real basis in reality. Neither the 'professor' nor the paper presented to The Royal Society ever claimed that the world would get colder. The projected cooling from an extended solar minimum is far less than the global warming from the increased CO2 levels.
No, the sun isn't going to save us from global warming
A solar minimum would offset no more than a decade’s worth of human-caused global warming
The Guardian
Dana Nuccitelli
16 July 2015
(excerpts)
Even the grandest solar minimum would have a minor impact on global temperatures compared to the rapid warming stemming from human carbon pollution. Photograph: Solar Dynamics Observatory/Nasa
A number of scientific studies have asked the question, ‘if the sun were to enter another extended quiet phase (a grand solar minimum), how would that impact global surface temperatures?’. Every study agrees, it would cause no more than 0.3°C cooling, which would only be enough to temporarily offset about a decade’s worth of human-caused global warming.
The global mean temperature difference is shown for the time period 1900 to 2100 for the IPCC A2 emissions scenario. The red line shows predicted temperature change for the current level of solar activity, the blue line shows predicted temperature change for solar activity at the much lower level of the Maunder Minimum, and the black line shows observed temperatures through 2010. Adapted from Feulner & Rahmstorf (2010) by SkepticalScience.com
This ‘impending mini ice age’ myth is incredibly easy to debunk. In fact it just takes asking one simple question – if the sun is such a key driver of the Earth’s climate, then why has the entire planet (air, oceans, land, and ice) warmed rapidly over the past 60 years while solar activity has declined?
Annual global surface temperature change (thin light red) with 11 year moving average of temperature (thick dark red). Temperature from NASA GISS. Annual Total Solar Irradiance (thin light blue) with 11 year moving average of TSI (thick dark blue). Source: Skeptical Science
That simple question is sufficient on its own to debunk the notion that the sun is the main driver of global temperatures. Research has clearly shown, it’s carbon dioxide that’s the temperature’s main control knob.
Second, research has suggested that the solar minimum around the year 1650 played a relatively small role in the cool temperatures during the Little Ice Age. Instead, heightened volcanic activity (pumping ash into the atmosphere that blocks sunlight) and a drop in atmospheric carbon levels were the main contributors to the cooling during that time.
Third, the Little Ice Age wasn’t even that cold, globally. The following chart shows the most comprehensive global surface temperature reconstruction to date, from the PAGES 2k Consortium. In just the past few decades the planet has warmed more than it cooled during the entire Little Ice Age.
Green dots show the 30-year average of the new PAGES 2k reconstruction. The red curve shows the global mean surface temperature, according HadCRUT4 data from 1850 onwards. In blue is the original hockey stick of Mann, Bradley and Hughes (1999) with its uncertainty range (light blue). Graph by Klaus Bitterman. 400 years of sunspot observations are inlaid, created by Robert Rohde.
There was significant regional cooling during the mini ice age, particularly in parts of Europe and North America, but globally it was indeed quite little.
Fourth, a grand solar minimum would be a temporary phase. Any cooling it caused would only last a few decades until the end of the event, at which point the increase in solar activity would contribute to global warming.
In summary, the difference between the Little Ice Age and current warming period comes down to volcanoes, carbon dioxide, and magnitude. The previous cool period was quite small, likely caused mostly by volcanic activity. And of course, humans weren’t pumping over 30 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year in the 17th century, as we are now.
The bottom line: even the grandest solar minimum would have a minor impact on global temperatures compared to the rapid warming stemming from human carbon pollution.
Your fraudulent moronic OP got completely debunked in post #10. Your demented denier cult myths and bogus propaganda get regularly debunked, especially if I'm around. You are an anti-science troll and you always post utter bullcrap and lies.
s0n.....you gotta find a different link than that one with the photo of the sun!! How many times have y9ou posted that same link up in here? Like 200 times?
s0n.....your every post mental meltdown........you label yourself as a religious k00k. Whats up with that???
.........anybody not part of the religion can see that from 100 million miles away!!! To the non-religious person, curious about finding out about this debate, every time you post, it looks like you saw a skeptic post and got a knobby cucumber fired up your pooper.Have a little fun around here like we skeptics do.......we spend near every moment in here laughing our balls off. The optics are far better than making every post a hysterical nutty-ass rant. Just looks ghey.............
DOMINATE
