Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?You mean the Ted Stevens who actually went to trial (indicted) and was found guilty? That Ted Stevens?Sort of like the Trump accusers....coming forward right before the election
And very much like how Ted Stevens was attacked in Alaska to make way for a Dem Senator.
Right out of the demoquack play book
Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
You know that info was out there before now and people in Alabama knew various aspects for decades right? All we are hearing now is the WaPost, that was down there for the primaries, picked up on the news that was already being talked about.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
Just because YOU are just hearing about it doesn't make it new news.
Er.......no. They are still there. You just don't want to pay attention. Listening to What Trump’s Accusers Have Told UsGee, you're right. No one knew he was a serial adulterer and pussy grabber until the election.Sort of like the Trump accusers....coming forward right before the election
Where did the accusers go, dumbass? They simply vanushed lol
How much money has been paid? And from what source?I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
Well hell, it's not easy finding someone to pay big money for lying.
and of course, he's not accused of rape even now.Because over the last few weeks people have been urged to come forward. Also, because this child rapist had never run for national office before.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
Gee, you're right. No one knew he was a serial adulterer and pussy grabber until the election.Sort of like the Trump accusers....coming forward right before the election
You mean the same treatment as to having a trial where both he and his accusers are under oath and evidence is looked for by investigating authorities (i.e. the validity of Moore's handwriting in the yearbook)......Yes.He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?You mean the Ted Stevens who actually went to trial (indicted) and was found guilty? That Ted Stevens?And very much like how Ted Stevens was attacked in Alaska to make way for a Dem Senator.
Right out of the demoquack play book
Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
Considering that the Feds withheld exonerating evidence that would have helped Stevens, I can see why you would want Moore to get the same treatment.
Fascinating.....now race enters the picture.and of course, he's not accused of rape even now.Because over the last few weeks people have been urged to come forward. Also, because this child rapist had never run for national office before.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
There are some lies people just won't tell. Being raped is one of them. Gloria Allred is going to have to find a black liar to make the next accusation.
You mean the same treatment as to having a trial where both he and his accusers are under oath and evidence is looked for by investigating authorities (i.e. the validity of Moore's handwriting in the yearbook)......Yes.He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?You mean the Ted Stevens who actually went to trial (indicted) and was found guilty? That Ted Stevens?Right out of the demoquack play book
Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
Considering that the Feds withheld exonerating evidence that would have helped Stevens, I can see why you would want Moore to get the same treatment.
THey didn't. You've just been told they did. Listening to What Trump’s Accusers Have Told UsGee, you're right. No one knew he was a serial adulterer and pussy grabber until the election.Sort of like the Trump accusers....coming forward right before the election
You don't find it odd that they all vanished after the election?
Yes another common defense by the Trump retards is that all Roy Moore did was makeout with and feel up the children, and that’s perfectly okay. The party of family valuesand of course, he's not accused of rape even now.Because over the last few weeks people have been urged to come forward. Also, because this child rapist had never run for national office before.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
There are some lies people just won't tell. Being raped is one of them. Gloria Allred is going to have to find a black liar to make the next accusation.
This is "political damage" for Alabama GOPrs? Are you kidding? It's a badge of honor for them.You mean the same treatment as to having a trial where both he and his accusers are under oath and evidence is looked for by investigating authorities (i.e. the validity of Moore's handwriting in the yearbook)......Yes.He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?You mean the Ted Stevens who actually went to trial (indicted) and was found guilty? That Ted Stevens?
Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
Considering that the Feds withheld exonerating evidence that would have helped Stevens, I can see why you would want Moore to get the same treatment.
I'm perfectly fine with following actual due process in Moore's case. It's what I have said all along.
At this point, however, it's too late. The political damage has been done, which was the agenda all along.
I don't know their reasons for coming forward but it is obvious why they stayed silent for so long. They are being trashed by Moore's supporters and likely the statute of limitations for any crimes ran out long ago so they had little to gain and much to lose.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
I expect him to win in Alabama....because.....Alabama.Yes another common defense by the Trump retards is that all Roy Moore did was makeout with and feel up the children, and that’s perfectly okay. The party of family valuesand of course, he's not accused of rape even now.Because over the last few weeks people have been urged to come forward. Also, because this child rapist had never run for national office before.I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
There are some lies people just won't tell. Being raped is one of them. Gloria Allred is going to have to find a black liar to make the next accusation.
This is "political damage" for Alabama GOPrs? Are you kidding? It's a badge of honor for them.You mean the same treatment as to having a trial where both he and his accusers are under oath and evidence is looked for by investigating authorities (i.e. the validity of Moore's handwriting in the yearbook)......Yes.He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
Considering that the Feds withheld exonerating evidence that would have helped Stevens, I can see why you would want Moore to get the same treatment.
I'm perfectly fine with following actual due process in Moore's case. It's what I have said all along.
At this point, however, it's too late. The political damage has been done, which was the agenda all along.
THey didn't. You've just been told they did. Listening to What Trump’s Accusers Have Told UsGee, you're right. No one knew he was a serial adulterer and pussy grabber until the election.Sort of like the Trump accusers....coming forward right before the election
You don't find it odd that they all vanished after the election?
I haven't heard a single credible explanation for why his accusers decided to come forward after 40 years of silence. Can someone explain this?
P.S. Please spare me about living in fear, repressed memory, PTSD, etc. These women have been adults for a very long time.
You mean the same treatment as to having a trial where both he and his accusers are under oath and evidence is looked for by investigating authorities (i.e. the validity of Moore's handwriting in the yearbook)......Yes.He had a trial...with witnesses and people under oath......are we now in agreement that the same needs to happen to Child-chaser Moore?You mean the Ted Stevens who actually went to trial (indicted) and was found guilty? That Ted Stevens?Right out of the demoquack play book
Yes, that same Ted Stevens about whom the feds engaged in withholding evidence that most likely would have exonerated him. From one of your favorite sources, NPR:
An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge has concluded that two Justice Department prosecutors intentionally hid evidence in the case against Sen. Ted Stevens, one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history.
A blistering report released Thursday found that the government team concealed documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later....
And in an ironic twist, note how the chief witness against Stevens was a PEDOPHILE.
The government team also left the jury with a mistaken impression that Allen had been telling authorities all along that Stevens had cooked up a cover story about wanting to pay all the bills. But in fact, the report says, Allen didn't mention that in 55 previous interviews with prosecutors and the FBI — only coming up with the account that helped the Justice Department on the eve of trial.
Finally, the report says, prosecutors should have shared information that might have obliterated Allen's credibility: an explosive allegation that Allen had a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl and then asked her to lie about it under oath.
Report: Prosecutors Hid Evidence In Ted Stevens Case
Considering that the Feds withheld exonerating evidence that would have helped Stevens, I can see why you would want Moore to get the same treatment.
