ROTFLOL!! White House considered dumping illegals in Dim controlled sanctuary cities

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by DigitalDrifter, Apr 12, 2019.

  1. basquebromance
    Offline

    basquebromance Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Messages:
    38,249
    Thanks Received:
    3,298
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Location:
    LaPorte, Indiana
    Ratings:
    +21,491
    Can anyone name ONE SUBSTANTIVE THING President Trump has done to secure our border or make Americans safer since he declared a National Emergency? Just one? What was the purpose in declaring it? To present the optics of "winning"?

    Now that I think about it, Coulter basically rolled her eyes at the announcement of a National Emergency. I guess she was right. It did nothing.
     
  2. Weatherman2020
    Offline

    Weatherman2020 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    43,807
    Thanks Received:
    8,392
    Trophy Points:
    2,100
    Location:
    Left Coast, Classified
    Ratings:
    +52,400
    56665EAF-745D-4E8F-B4E8-0FC43D8E1779.jpeg
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  3. Weatherman2020
    Offline

    Weatherman2020 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    43,807
    Thanks Received:
    8,392
    Trophy Points:
    2,100
    Location:
    Left Coast, Classified
    Ratings:
    +52,400
    Yes, all of those DETAINED people at the border you Leftards are whining about is failure in your miserable world.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. The Purge
    Online

    The Purge Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    1,894
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +10,031
    Townhall.com ^

    If the liberal attitude toward immigration and a host of other issues could be summed up with just one saying, it would be this one: “good for thee, but not for me.”

    Safely tucked away inside their think tanks, tenured academic positions, lilly-white suburban enclaves, and ESPECIALLY behind their carefully crafted WALLS, it’s easy for liberals to virtue-signal about how the rest of us should be “compassionate” and agree to welcome every migrant who takes a notion to come to the United States. But when it comes to their own personal lives, their “money” is almost never anywhere in the vicinity of their big fat jabbering pie holes.

    In other words, just like with the degree of charitable contributions from people all-too-eager to spend YOUR money, liberals are big fat hypocrites.

    Such was the case last week when President Donald Trump brilliantly proposed - in a masterful troll job that may very well exceed all of his previous troll jobs - that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) transport illegal border-crossers to … wait for it ... sanctuary cities. Sure, it’ll sadly probably never happen, and likely the only reason Trump brought it up was to do exactly what it did - expose liberal hypocrisy. But even so, you’d think liberals would be ALL OVER the notion, right? This should be so EASY, given their worldview, so why not just call Trump’s bluff and say “bring them on in?” I mean, even allowing for the typical degree of liberal hypocrisy, the very definition of “sanctuary city” means that those in charge of designating their cities as such must want them to be, you know, a SANCTUARY for illegal immigrants. The more the merrier, they’re always saying, yet when the bad orange man proposes giving them what they supposedly want, right in their own backyards, they look that gift horse in the mouth like it’s got three eyes.

    It’s almost like they think Mexico and Central America aren’t sending their best, or something.

    Senator Amy Klobuchar accused Trump of “literally using human beings as pawns in a political game.” If that was the case, it was a checkmate move, Mr. President. Actress Alyssa Milano called the idea “sick and twisted.” Rep. Adam “Pencil-Neck” Schiff called it a “hare-brained scheme.” Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro waxed eloquent about “the cruelty of this administration,” because apparently the definition of “cruelty” is matching liberals up with the reality of their absurd utopian fantasies. CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin accused the Trump administration of treating illegals like a “pestilence to spread around the country,” which still begs the question: if they love them so much why would they care?

    And then there was Cher, who did a Trump-prompted stark 180 on mass immigration by wondering via Twitter why Los Angeles and California, a city and state that aren’t “taking care of” their “own” should bring in and “take care of more.” This was a woman who, less than two years ago mind you, begged anyone who could to “take a dreamer” into their home. It’s hard to know how long it’ll be before “red-pilled Cher” issues the obligatory profuse apology, but for today at least it’s nice to see a ray of common sense pierce even the most brainwashed of souls.

    There were plenty more where those came from, all perfectly summed up by Trump Deputy Director of Communications Matt Wolking, who tweeted: “Seeing left-wing media folks who advocate for open borders lose their minds because immigrants will bring violence and crime to their cities is ... quite a sight.”

    Indeed. It reminds me of Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s now legendary question to Jorge Ramos last October when the Univision anchor was traveling with the first migrant caravan.

    “How many of these migrants are you taking in personally into your home and are supporting once they get into the United States?” Carlson asked Ramos.

    “I think that’s a great question and that’s precisely the kind of question that people like you ask when you don’t want to understand that this has nothing to do with individuals,” Ramos responded. After an awkward back and forth, Carlson asked him if he would simply take in “three” migrants, a question Ramos dodged yet again because he CLEARLY wasn’t about to take any of the migrants he supposedly cares so much about into his sprawling, walled (because of course it is) mansion. They might get the carpets dirty, after all.

    To his credit, San Jose, California Mayor Sam Liccardo is the only liberal non-hypocrite in America right now. That’s because he offered to take any illegal immigrants President Trump would transfer to his city: “[Donald Trump] plans to release detained immigrants to [San Jose]??” Liccardo tweeted Friday. “We welcome any families willing to endure such extraordinary hardships and to take such tremendous risks to be a part of our great country.”

    Liccardo’s non-hypocrisy, on this issue at least, stands in stark contrast to the rest of his ideological brethren. Liberals want to take your money and choose where to spend it, but don’t want to give it themselves. Liberals want walls for their mansions and their neighborhoods, but none for America. Liberals want armed guards and even guns for themselves, but would disarm ordinary Americans whose lives apparently aren’t as “valuable” as theirs.

    And as Trump masterfully exposed, they want endless immigration from the Third World, but not anywhere near where they live.

    ------------

    [​IMG]
    If socialism is so grand, why are Guatemalans coming here instead of going to Venezuela?
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  5. Penelope
    Offline

    Penelope Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,313
    Thanks Received:
    3,237
    Trophy Points:
    1,145
    Ratings:
    +18,883
    Tramp is just using the asylum seekers as political pawns. He is a shameful idiot.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Oddball
    Online

    Oddball Unobtanium Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    51,376
    Thanks Received:
    10,917
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +29,177
    Thanks for the vapid party line talking point, regurgitated right on cue.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. RealDave
    Offline

    RealDave Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2016
    Messages:
    15,888
    Thanks Received:
    1,702
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,697
    Shove your white supremacy up your fat ass.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. RealDave
    Offline

    RealDave Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2016
    Messages:
    15,888
    Thanks Received:
    1,702
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,697
    You mean Volvo Truck, right?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. Zorro!
    Online

    Zorro! Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    251
    Thanks Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Ratings:
    +172
    Trump Has a Legal Right to Move Detainees to Sanctuary Cities

    [​IMG]
    Donald J. Trump

    ✔@realDonaldTrump

    The USA has the absolute legal right to have apprehended illegal immigrants transferred to Sanctuary Cities. We hereby demand that they be taken care of at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known for its poor management & high taxes!

    6:47 PM - Apr 13, 2019

    The federal government does have the legal right to relocate immigration detainees as it sees fit. The federal government and its executive agencies have wide legal discretion overseeing immigration generally and detention specifically. Just as prisoners within the federal corrections system can legally be transferred from one facility to another, a person can be freely reassigned among detention centers.

    Director of Safe Passage Project Lenni Benson explained:

    When DHS takes custody of a person at the border they have authority to move them to any detention center or location where they have arranged for detention (private or rented spaces). In some cases Congress has mandated detention and in others detention is at the discretion of the DHS. They can choose the location.
     
  10. Ricky LIbtardo
    Offline

    Ricky LIbtardo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Messages:
    3,280
    Thanks Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    2,065
    Ratings:
    +11,272
    It was a Peterbilt.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2

Share This Page