Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Thank you, Doctor Dipschitt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get re-bent.Have a good life Knotheads.
Your anecdotal experience and little Ronnie's cheap piece of shit book don't add up to a medical diagnosis.
Thank you, Doctor Dipschitt.
Get re-bent.Have a good life Knotheads.
Your anecdotal experience and little Ronnie's cheap piece of shit book don't add up to a medical diagnosis.
But, what it does add up to is that the "black sheep" of the family gets his payback with a paycheck.
Reagan was obviosly suffering from the disease in my mind.
How sad that his son is attacked for pointing out the facts
You do realize, don't you, that Ron is not a dispassionate observer?Its been 23 years since Reagan left office. There is no reason we need to "protect his legacy" as we attempt to elevate him to sainthood. Other presidents such as Wilson, FDR and JFK have had their medical infirmities leaked to the public after they left office. It did not affect their legacy.
Why is Reagan exempt? Why the vicious attacks on the messenger?
Get re-bent.Have a good life Knotheads.
Your anecdotal experience and little Ronnie's cheap piece of shit book don't add up to a medical diagnosis.
Its been 23 years since Reagan left office. There is no reason we need to "protect his legacy" as we attempt to elevate him to sainthood. Other presidents such as Wilson, FDR and JFK have had their medical infirmities leaked to the public after they left office. It did not affect their legacy.
Why is Reagan exempt? Why the vicious attacks on the messenger?
I don't understand why so many RWers are clearly upset, stating that Ron should grow up already.
Is it not his father? Is he not his father's namesake?
Does he not KNOW his father's history and/or condition at any given time throughout his life?
The answer is yes.
I suspect that Ron's a big miffed, to say the least, of the diefication of his father in RW/Republican circles.
If Ron says the man had a touch of the Zheimer's I'm inclined to believe him.
From what I know the disease doesn't just spring up, it creeps up over the years, decades even until it finally consumes you.
Ron Reagan has all the right to express himself and divulge all the information HE feels he should about HIS OWN father.
Talk about needing to grow up.
You do realize, don't you, that Ron is not a dispassionate observer?Its been 23 years since Reagan left office. There is no reason we need to "protect his legacy" as we attempt to elevate him to sainthood. Other presidents such as Wilson, FDR and JFK have had their medical infirmities leaked to the public after they left office. It did not affect their legacy.
Why is Reagan exempt? Why the vicious attacks on the messenger?
He's got a book to sell.
You do realize, don't you, that Ron is not a dispassionate observer?Its been 23 years since Reagan left office. There is no reason we need to "protect his legacy" as we attempt to elevate him to sainthood. Other presidents such as Wilson, FDR and JFK have had their medical infirmities leaked to the public after they left office. It did not affect their legacy.
Why is Reagan exempt? Why the vicious attacks on the messenger?
He's got a book to sell.
Doesn't every biographer?
Fact is that Ron Jr was there. He is entitled to publish his opinion of what he saw regarding his fathers eventual mental breakdown. His brother Michael is just as biased as he attempts to live off of his fathers conservative legacy.
History needs all these bits of information as it attempts to record the Reagan legacy. There is nothing to be ashamed of here. Reagan is evaluated on what he did while he was president. Nobody is circling the wagons to protect Wilson, FDR or JFK....it is just part of the historical record
You do realize, don't you, that Ron is not a dispassionate observer?
He's got a book to sell.
Doesn't every biographer?
Fact is that Ron Jr was there. He is entitled to publish his opinion of what he saw regarding his fathers eventual mental breakdown. His brother Michael is just as biased as he attempts to live off of his fathers conservative legacy.
History needs all these bits of information as it attempts to record the Reagan legacy. There is nothing to be ashamed of here. Reagan is evaluated on what he did while he was president. Nobody is circling the wagons to protect Wilson, FDR or JFK....it is just part of the historical record
That's one of the problems. No..He was NOT there.
Doesn't every biographer?
Fact is that Ron Jr was there. He is entitled to publish his opinion of what he saw regarding his fathers eventual mental breakdown. His brother Michael is just as biased as he attempts to live off of his fathers conservative legacy.
History needs all these bits of information as it attempts to record the Reagan legacy. There is nothing to be ashamed of here. Reagan is evaluated on what he did while he was president. Nobody is circling the wagons to protect Wilson, FDR or JFK....it is just part of the historical record
That's one of the problems. No..He was NOT there.
Do you have proof he never saw his father in 8 years in the White House?