because Soros has funded lawsuits and funded PACs etcWell yeah, you can make a case for why you think it’s likely. Show the facts that lead you to that conclusion. Or are you just making shit up? That’s the discussion
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
because Soros has funded lawsuits and funded PACs etcWell yeah, you can make a case for why you think it’s likely. Show the facts that lead you to that conclusion. Or are you just making shit up? That’s the discussion
The lawyers should be sanctioned.It is clear that his testimony in the Rittenhouse trial that he pointed his illegal loaded Glock at Kyle is going to come back and bite him in the ass.
I can't believe his lawyers think they can really win any kind of settlement. I suspect his lawyers are paid by some outside hateful Leftest money to demean Kyle.
The fact is you’re lying – as usual.proof of what? "likely...." is that a hard word for you to grasp?
prove me wrong,, until then youre the ,only one giving an opinion,,Again research the law, not your opinions.
what was the lie?The fact is you’re lying – as usual.
You have neither proof no evidence, just lies.
Crucial point is did he discharge his weapon at the time?Okay. But in the end, it was fund that Kyle was justified in using deadly force because Grosskreutz pointed a deadly weapon at him.
We learned at trial that Kyle had pointed his weapon at several people earlier in the evening.
So...
you must be trollingWhich takes legitimate precedence: The Constitution of the United States established as this nation's highest body of law, or a much lower state law?
you must be trolling
you can't be this stupid
Grosskreutz? No. Yet Kyle shooting him was still ruled self defense. Thanks for asking.Crucial point is did he discharge his weapon at the time?
The perp was raising up to shoot.....Grosskreutz? No. Yet Kyle shooting him was still ruled self defense. Thanks for asking.
No, he was just pointing his weapon. That's all that was entered onto evidence. And Kyle was therefore ruled to have acted in self defense. I'm not going to argue the baseline facts with you. Go peddle your alternate reality to someone else.The perp was raising up to shoot.....
Pointing your weapon to a person immediately in front of you is a threat to that persons life.No, he was just pointing his weapon. That's all that was entered onto evidence. And Kyle was therefore ruled to have acted in self defense. I'm not going to argue the baseline facts with you. Go peddle your alternate reality to someone else.
I don't disagree. In fact, that was my point you have been squirming to sidestep.Pointing your weapon to a person immediately in front of you is a threat to that persons life.
LOL........you sure are a POS.I don't disagree. In fact, that was my point you have been squirming to sidestep.
Cry it all out, little guy.LOL........you sure are a POS.
You’re at liberty to lie, of course, and be dishonest.what was the lie?
huh?You’re at liberty to lie, of course, and be dishonest.
Just understand no one believes your lies.
The dude pointed a weapon at Rittenhouse's head....that counts for something.
The kyle on the run from the process server and begging for money.On what basis do you say that?