Biff_Poindexter
Diamond Member
Right-wingers unleash rabid misogyny against Pamela Karlan
Like clockwork, the usually pathetic conservative cucks, Rush, Tucker and Hannity launch their attack on the constitutional expert that made them most feel the sads….Don't mention the fact that there were 2 other witnesses who made the same legal conclusion that this one witness did, but only that one witness is getting an all out attack...and it wasn't because of a joke.....
"Republicans were desperate to do anything to keep voters from paying attention to the actual substance of the testimony from the three law professors summoned to explain why Donald Trump should be impeached for his crimes, since the substance of their testimony is irrefutable. And while all three were articulate, intelligent and crystal clear in their arguments...the go-to move on the prime-time Fox News shows Wednesday night was to "diagnose" Karlan with a mental illness."
Leave it to republicans to clutch their pearls and fall onto the fainting couch over this statement....."The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron," Karlan cracked, in response to a question about the differences between kings and presidents." --- Oh no, pass me the smelling salts, oh no, the horror!! oh no, I'm getting the vapors!!
Republicans are actually claiming that she attacked Barron, are you people not ashamed of yourself yet?? The main folks who call everyone else snowflakes continue to be the biggest whiniest bitches on the planet..all to distract from the point that not one of her points could they refute...not a single one....
Instead of refuting the facts of her testimony, instead of refuting the facts of Feldman's testimony, instead of refuting the facts of Gerhardt's testimony -- instead people like Rush only attacked her by saying "[Karlan] is a "babe who is making up stories" and that she's been "poisoned with abject hatred." <<-- if she is making up stories about the constitution and the framers thoughts on impeachment, refute her argument...how about Sean Hannity's hard hitting critique on her assessment of the constitutionality of impeachment -- in which he said "Imagine carrying around that much hatred, that much resentment and anger every day of your life. Pretty sad, pretty pathetic" <<-- Again, if she is wrong about the constitution and the framers thoughts on impeachment, refute her argument...but they won't, instead they are gonna stick to making personal attacks because the facts ain't on their side....
Like clockwork, the usually pathetic conservative cucks, Rush, Tucker and Hannity launch their attack on the constitutional expert that made them most feel the sads….Don't mention the fact that there were 2 other witnesses who made the same legal conclusion that this one witness did, but only that one witness is getting an all out attack...and it wasn't because of a joke.....
"Republicans were desperate to do anything to keep voters from paying attention to the actual substance of the testimony from the three law professors summoned to explain why Donald Trump should be impeached for his crimes, since the substance of their testimony is irrefutable. And while all three were articulate, intelligent and crystal clear in their arguments...the go-to move on the prime-time Fox News shows Wednesday night was to "diagnose" Karlan with a mental illness."
Leave it to republicans to clutch their pearls and fall onto the fainting couch over this statement....."The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the President can name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron," Karlan cracked, in response to a question about the differences between kings and presidents." --- Oh no, pass me the smelling salts, oh no, the horror!! oh no, I'm getting the vapors!!
Republicans are actually claiming that she attacked Barron, are you people not ashamed of yourself yet?? The main folks who call everyone else snowflakes continue to be the biggest whiniest bitches on the planet..all to distract from the point that not one of her points could they refute...not a single one....
Instead of refuting the facts of her testimony, instead of refuting the facts of Feldman's testimony, instead of refuting the facts of Gerhardt's testimony -- instead people like Rush only attacked her by saying "[Karlan] is a "babe who is making up stories" and that she's been "poisoned with abject hatred." <<-- if she is making up stories about the constitution and the framers thoughts on impeachment, refute her argument...how about Sean Hannity's hard hitting critique on her assessment of the constitutionality of impeachment -- in which he said "Imagine carrying around that much hatred, that much resentment and anger every day of your life. Pretty sad, pretty pathetic" <<-- Again, if she is wrong about the constitution and the framers thoughts on impeachment, refute her argument...but they won't, instead they are gonna stick to making personal attacks because the facts ain't on their side....
