Right wing militia detains 200 migrants at gun point on New Mexico!! HELL YEAH!

[bodecea]

Let’s get it going! Which one of you coward democrats want to stop us!?

What do you mean by 'us'?

Have your balls even dropped yet? You don't act like it.

I seen more in my first 15 years of life then you will ever see

So..your voice crack yet?

 

[Jitss617]

Let’s get it going! Which one of you coward democrats want to stop us!?

What do you mean by 'us'?

Have your balls even dropped yet? You don't act like it.

I seen more in my first 15 years of life then you will ever see

So..your voice crack yet?

Has Obama’s lol

 

[Natural Citizen]

We are supposed to have militia ....QUOTE]

Acting through their state governements ya dumb motherfucker.

New Mexico government rips civilian militia for detaining 200 migrants at gunpoint near border

 

[Jitss617]

We are supposed to have militia ....QUOTE]

Acting through their state governements ya dumb motherfucker

Where does the constitution say that

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Border and cities,, where do you think they move to? Poor areas.. I confront the left wing for the agenda that allows them to destroy America

So you are not actually part of the militia mentioned in the article.

And yet you called ME a dumb ass for trying to clarify......

ooooooooKAY then

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I confront libs daily on the streets

And apparently those on the same side as well.

 

[Natural Citizen]

This is not, as the article claims, a "New Mexico militia."

A "New Mexico militia" would act through the state.

Just because some dolts wanna play cowboy and happen to be in New Mexico doesn't make it a "New Mexico militia."

 

[Jitss617]

Border and cities,, where do you think they move to? Poor areas.. I confront the left wing for the agenda that allows them to destroy America

So you are not actually part of the militia mentioned in the article.

And yet you called ME a dumb ass for trying to clarify......

ooooooooKAY then

Yes you are

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Got it. thanks

 

[skookerasbil]

We will certainly be seeing alot more of this moving forward. The progressive asshats will think calling people racists will deter people from doing it!. This is just the beginning of the trigger being flipped.....and progressives will happily sit back and watch. Those that dont will end up with those faggy batons sticking clear out their asses!

 

[Natural Citizen]

Where does the constitution say that

Start with Federalist numbers 28 and 46 by Hamilton and Madison. The Federalist being the blueprint for the Constitution. When you're finished, come back here.

 

[Jitss617]

Where does the constitution say that

Start with Federalist numbers 28 and 46. The Federalist being the blueprint for the Constitution. When you're finished, come back here.

Didn’t think so

 

[Natural Citizen]

I am one

No, you're not. You're a nobody.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

This is not, as the article claims, a "New Mexico militia."
A "New Mexico militia" would act through the state.
Just because some dolts wanna play cowboy and happen to be in New Mexico doesn't make it a "New Mexico militia."

Some interpret the Constitution differently.

I don't believe that, having waged war against Great Britain, that the intent was to limit armed opposition to only government entities.

The Right to Bear Arms implies that We The People shall have possession of the power and means to defend against government tyranny, where ever it originates, and that that right Shall Not Be Infringed by the Federal Government NOR any State Government.

We The People are specifically empowered by the Constitution to form militias independent of any government sanctioning.

Think about it. If we have to be "Allowed" to form militias by government authorities, that negates the entire spirit of the 2nd Amendment.

Does that mean that any armed group can just band together and undertake actions normally delegated to government authorities?

No.

But when such groups have formed to carry out those duties and actions stated within the Constitution as just, and it can be clearly demonstrated that the government has failed in it's Constitutional duties, as is the case with the borders, then it overrides any government authority. Again, that is the spirit of the 2nd amendment and the Constitution in it's entirety as it is a document specifically designed to LIMIT the powers of the Federal government, but also state governments by proxy.

To put ultimate power in the hands of We The People....and not any sanctioned government authority.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Didn’t think so

You didn't think so what? You didn't read those that fast ya fukin little peckerhead.

 

[Jitss617]

Didn’t think so

You didn't think so what? You didn't read those that fast ya fukin little peckerhead.

Right to bear arms against a tyrannical government .. but let me let the government know I am attacking you lol

 

[Natural Citizen]

This is not, as the article claims, a "New Mexico militia."
A "New Mexico militia" would act through the state.
Just because some dolts wanna play cowboy and happen to be in New Mexico doesn't make it a "New Mexico militia."

Some interpret the Constitution differently.

I don't believe that, having waged war against Great Britain, that the intent was to limit armed opposition to only government entities.

The Right to Bear Arms implies that We The People shall have possession of the power and means to defend against government tyranny, where ever it originates, and that that right Shall Not Be Infringed by the Federal Government NOR any State Government.

We The People are specifically empowered by the Constitution to form militias independent of any government sanctioning.

Think about it. If we have to be "Allowed" to form militias by government authorities, that negates the entire spirit of the 2nd Amendment.

Does that mean that any armed group can just band together and undertake actions normally delegated to government authorities?

No.

But when such groups have formed to carry out those actions stated within the Constitution, then it overrides any government authority. Again, that is the spirit of the 2nd amendment and the Constitution in it's entirety as iot is a document specifically designed to LIMIT the powers of the Federal government, but also state governments by proxy.

Militias are empowered to function through the state.

And you already negated to second amendment when you relinquished your first, fifth and tenth amendments in order to require a gun. Go try to buy one and when they ask you for your name to run the background check, tell em no and see if the government lets you leave there exercising your second amendment right with a gun.

 

[Jitss617]

This is not, as the article claims, a "New Mexico militia."
A "New Mexico militia" would act through the state.
Just because some dolts wanna play cowboy and happen to be in New Mexico doesn't make it a "New Mexico militia."

Some interpret the Constitution differently.

I don't believe that, having waged war against Great Britain, that the intent was to limit armed opposition to only government entities.

The Right to Bear Arms implies that We The People shall have possession of the power and means to defend against government tyranny, where ever it originates, and that that right Shall Not Be Infringed by the Federal Government NOR any State Government.

We The People are specifically empowered by the Constitution to form militias independent of any government sanctioning.

Think about it. If we have to be "Allowed" to form militias by government authorities, that negates the entire spirit of the 2nd Amendment.

Does that mean that any armed group can just band together and undertake actions normally delegated to government authorities?

No.

But when such groups have formed to carry out those actions stated within the Constitution, then it overrides any government authority. Again, that is the spirit of the 2nd amendment and the Constitution in it's entirety as iot is a document specifically designed to LIMIT the powers of the Federal government, but also state governments by proxy.

Militias are empowered to function through the state.

And you already negated to second amendment when you relinquished your first, fifth and tenth amendments in order to require a gun.

Great we will be in a state.. and we will say hello state we are here lol there you go

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Militias are empowered to function through the state.

And what happens when states go rogue? California for example. Does that mean that people have no rights to defend their country if the California Governor and assembly decide that Mexico should have California back?
What do you think is the Constitutional remedy when States no longer follow the Constitution and the Federal government fails to intercede or uphold the Constitution?

And you already negated to second amendment when you relinquished your first, fifth and tenth amendments in order to require a gun. Go try to buy one and when they ask you your name to run the background check, tell em no and see if you leave there with a gun.

With this I sadly have to agree.
We have already relinquished most of our Constitutional rights willingly. without a peep.

As I've said 1000 times......(quoting Edmund Burke).....

All that is required for evil men to prevail is for good men to do nothing

There is no way to deny that the only path remaining in the USA to save the Republic is for a massive wave of patriots to form militias and demand a return to Constitutional governing.
While we'd love to see it happen otherwise, we are too far gone for that to work now.

 

[badger2]

Go Lobos!