Right vs. Left is Logic vs. Emotion

[P@triot]

Like when they were supposed to vote in obamas Supreme Court nomination? No problem violated constitution then.

Uh...that didn't violate the U.S. Constitution. The constitution calls for the Senate to "advise and consent" on appointments. Barack Insane Obama was constitutionally empowered to make an appointment, the Senate was constitutionally empowered to reject it.

They didn't even do that. But I see you are blind. Had Dems done the same thing you'd be whining.

Dumbocrats have done far worse than that. But yes - I wouldn't like it at all. It still doesn't change the fact that it did not violate the U.S. Constitution in any capacity.

 

[Brain357]

Why Trump’s Immigration Rules Are Unconstitutional

 

[P@triot]

If cons used logic they would be against the Muslim ban as there are zero attacks on US soil it would have prevented. But alas, the use their emotional fear and discrimination to think.

Yeah....uh....logic dictates that you don't invite enemies into your nation.

Isn't that ban unconstitutional?

Nope. Not even a little. It is 100% legal and constitutional. The fact that it was blocked by a left-wing judge acting like a political activist rather than a judge upholding the law is yet another example of the left violating the U.S. Constitution.

 

[Brain357]

Like when they were supposed to vote in obamas Supreme Court nomination? No problem violated constitution then.

Uh...that didn't violate the U.S. Constitution. The constitution calls for the Senate to "advise and consent" on appointments. Barack Insane Obama was constitutionally empowered to make an appointment, the Senate was constitutionally empowered to reject it.

They didn't even do that. But I see you are blind. Had Dems done the same thing you'd be whining.

Dumbocrats have done far worse than that. But yes - I wouldn't like it at all. It still doesn't change the fact that it did not violate the U.S. Constitution in any capacity.

They just failed to do their job. Shouldn't they constitutionally do their job? Course they continue to do nothing...

 

[Brain357]

If cons used logic they would be against the Muslim ban as there are zero attacks on US soil it would have prevented. But alas, the use their emotional fear and discrimination to think.

Yeah....uh....logic dictates that you don't invite enemies into your nation.

Isn't that ban unconstitutional?

Nope. Not even a little. It is 100% legal and constitutional. The fact that it was blocked by a left-wing judge acting like a political activist rather than a judge upholding the law is yet another example of the left violating the U.S. Constitution.

So you only care about the constitution if it supports something you want.

 

[P@triot]

Why Trump’s Immigration Rules Are Unconstitutional

Oh wow...a left-wing opinion hit piece. You really know how to bring it hard with the facts, uh? However, instead of the opinion of anti-American communists, how about we look at the actual law itself? Here is the actual law with a link to it on the actual government website:

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

That could not be more cut and dry. It could not be more clear. The President of the United States has full authority to block any class of foreigners for as long as he deems necessary. Foreigners do not have a right to access to the United States. Thanks for playing, chief!

Act 212(b) | USCIS

 

[P@triot]

They just failed to do their job. Shouldn't they constitutionally do their job? Course they continue to do nothing...

Mmmm....where were you when Harry Reid was blocking basic legislation?

Doing their job includes blocking a poor appointment by Barack Insane Obama. The onus was on him to appoint someone who would get approved. He chose a radical instead. He lost.

 

[P@triot]

I'm an independent.

Oh of course you are. Literally everyone here who isn't a conservative is an "independent". For some bizarre reason, a progressive has never visited this site.

 

[AntonToo]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:

The care, technology, and life saving treatment his family experienced was made possible by two, privately funded organizations. Both Cedars Sinai and Children’s Hospital LA are non-profit, not government-run, hospitals. This isn’t a coincidence.

When individuals are allowed to fund programs they like without a government mandate, we end up with more efficient and effective services. Hospitals are only one very important example.

Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

Jimmy Kimmel made an emotional appeal, therefore liberals are emotional and conservatives are logical.

Did I understand your conservative logic correctly?

 

[P@triot]

Jimmy Kimmel made an emotional appeal, therefore liberals are emotional and conservatives are logical.

Did I understand your conservative logic correctly?

Just the latest example. He lied about everything in his tear-filled monologue.

 

[Brain357]

They just failed to do their job. Shouldn't they constitutionally do their job? Course they continue to do nothing...

Mmmm....where were you when Harry Reid was blocking basic legislation?

Doing their job includes blocking a poor appointment by Barack Insane Obama. The onus was on him to appoint someone who would get approved. He chose a radical instead. He lost.

So republicans are pretty much the same as Dems?

 

[Brain357]

Why Trump’s Immigration Rules Are Unconstitutional

Oh wow...a left-wing opinion hit piece. You really know how to bring it hard with the facts, uh? However, instead of the opinion of anti-American communists, how about we look at the actual law itself? Here is the actual law with a link to it on the actual government website:

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

That could not be more cut and dry. It could not be more clear. The President of the United States has full authority to block any class of foreigners for as long as he deems necessary. Foreigners do not have a right to access to the United States. Thanks for playing, chief!

Act 212(b) | USCIS

And yet his ban has been shot down. Go figure.

 

[P@triot]

They just failed to do their job. Shouldn't they constitutionally do their job? Course they continue to do nothing...

Mmmm....where were you when Harry Reid was blocking basic legislation?

Doing their job includes blocking a poor appointment by Barack Insane Obama. The onus was on him to appoint someone who would get approved. He chose a radical instead. He lost.

So republicans are pretty much the same as Dems?

Not exactly. Dumbocrats are pure communists, socialists, marxists, and fascists. Republicans are progressives. Thank God for the Tea Party, uh?

 

[hunarcy]

PLEase provide an example where cons are cool With thoughts you don't agree on?

Literally every thought. You're the fascists who riot and assault people to stop simple political rallies by President Trump.

The right never shut down a Barack Obama rally. They never shut down a Hitlery Clinton rally. Hell, Bernie Sanders ran openly as a socialist and the right never shut down one of his rallies.

The right accepts just about everything and anything so long as it is not forced on us and so long as it does not violate the U.S. Constitution.

Like when they were supposed to vote on obamas Supreme Court nomination? No problem violating constitution then.

There was no violation of the constitution...why lie?

 

[hunarcy]

Like when they were supposed to vote in obamas Supreme Court nomination? No problem violated constitution then.

Uh...that didn't violate the U.S. Constitution. The constitution calls for the Senate to "advise and consent" on appointments. Barack Insane Obama was constitutionally empowered to make an appointment, the Senate was constitutionally empowered to reject it.

They didn't even do that. But I see you are blind. Had Dems done the same thing you'd be whining.

Not voting on it was a de facto rejection. Please change your name.

 

[P@triot]

And yet his ban has been shot down. Go figure.

Yeah...as I said...by a left-wing judge abusing power and violating the U.S. Constitution. But that being said - President Trump's ban has not been "shot down". It has a temporary injunction against it. The U.S. Supreme Court will uphold the very legal, and very constitutional Executive Order.

 

[OldLady]

St. Jude's is wonderful, but I did not know it was 100% a conservative organization. No leftists are allowed to contribute, huh? I thought it was a Mason's hospital. Am I confusing it with another one?

Don't twist it. St. Jude's proves that the private sector handles charitable needs a gabillion times better than socialism/communism can. Just imagine what we could do if our money wasn't being stolen against our will for welfare, food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, housing, transportation, etc.

I didn't twist anything. YOU did, by making charity a political attribute. You didn't answer my question. How do conservatives take "credit" for St Judes? BTW, those were not the hospitals mentioned in the OP.

 

[Moonglow]

St. Jude's is wonderful, but I did not know it was 100% a conservative organization. No leftists are allowed to contribute, huh? I thought it was a Mason's hospital. Am I confusing it with another one?

Don't twist it. St. Jude's proves that the private sector handles charitable needs a gabillion times better than socialism/communism can. Just imagine what we could do if our money wasn't being stolen against our will for welfare, food stamps, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, housing, transportation, etc.

I didn't twist anything. YOU did, by making charity a political attribute. You didn't answer my question. How do conservatives take "credit" for St Judes? BTW, those were not the hospitals mentioned in the OP.

Conservatives turn into Jews for a day...

 

[AntonToo]

Jimmy Kimmel made an emotional appeal, therefore liberals are emotional and conservatives are logical.

Did I understand your conservative logic correctly?

Just the latest example. He lied about everything in his tear-filled monologue.

It is called a LOGICAL FALLACY and you sir are logic challenged.

 

[hunarcy]

Why Trump’s Immigration Rules Are Unconstitutional

Ah, by the world famous constitutional scholar, Corey Brett Schneider. *yawn*