toomuchtime_
Gold Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 20,180
- 5,070
- 280
It is all irrelevant. Even if we were to suppose 194 did establish a right of return, to claim that right some one who had left would have had to apply to the Israeli government or Israeli courts as an individual to be allowed to live in Israel or to claim his/her property or receive compensation for it. The Arabs who left did not do this, so they effectively abandoned whatever rights they may have had. Three generations later, the grandchild of an Arab who left during the war cannot claim what his grandfather had abandoned.
Of course that is a pantload.
In other words, you don't like it, but you have no specific criticism of it.