xsited1
Agent P
they're against it for the reason i said... they think protecting girls from cervical cancer will cause them to have unrestrained and wild sex.
That is one of silliest things I've ever heard. At first I thought you were joking, but now I see you are not. That's like saying that because the National Organization for Women is against something, that means that all liberals and Democrats are against it. Do wingnuts become more radical the older they get?
i'm not the one who said it would encourage girls to have sex. don't blame me for rightwingnut lunacy.