Asclepias
Diamond Member
Thanks for your concern. I'll make it through.I dont see myself as the only holder of truth. Plenty of other people know more than I do about the subject. None of them however, are on this forum. Just sayin.How can a third party be neutral if they have already been brainwashed by white fables? That would be like me having someone that believes they were abducted by aliens moderate a debate on the plausibility of life on other planets. You didnt give me a choice of judges. You gave me a list of people just as lacking in knowledge as you are. They are going to weigh credibility of any argument based on standards set up by whites. I dont need validation from others to support my arguments. If you were a man you wouldnt need that crutch either.Either you cant read or you're stalling. I said "you and I". Thats why I asked the question you avoided yet again.
The entire point of a moderated debate is to have a third neutral party evaluate the strength of each argument and declare a winner. You are never going to agree with me and my position and I am never going to agree with you and yours. That's called an impasse. Rejecting third party scrutiny of your argument (especially when I gave you the choice of judges) indicates that you aren't very confident in your ability to put forward a strong argument.
If you see yourself as the only holder of truth and you don't feel confident in you ability to convince others of that truth then you must not be very confident about said truth; or your truth must not be that powerful. Just saying.
I'm sorry that you have to live with such insecurities.