REPUBLICANS POUNCE!! Look how the Dimms and the media "report" bad Dimms news by blasting PUBS

[ColonelAngus]

This shit is really funny.

Instead of reporting: "THE OBAMACARE WEBSITE IS A FUCKING TRAINWRECK"

The media and the DIMMS "FRAME" the argument as "REPUBLICANS POUNCE TO EXPLOIT THE ISSUES WITH OBAMACARE WEBSITE."

This way, they can say they covered the bad news about the DIMMS, but it's framed to BLAST Republicans.

Funny tactic....look for it...it's hilariousl

Media Bias: “Conservatives Pounce” Trope Reveals Journalists’ Homogeneity | National Review

The Media Bias Reflected in Republican Reaction Stories

“Republicans seize on Planned Parenthood video,” (Not, "PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAUGHT SELLING BABY BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT"

Noah Rothman on Twitter

 

[doesanyoneknowmyname]

This shit is really funny.

Instead of reporting: "THE OBAMACARE WEBSITE IS A FUCKING TRAINWRECK"

The media and the DIMMS "FRAME" the argument as "REPUBLICANS POUNCE TO EXPLOIT THE ISSUES WITH OBAMACARE WEBSITE."

This way, they can say they covered the bad news about the DIMMS, but it's framed to BLAST Republicans.

Funny tactic....look for it...it's hilariousl

Media Bias: “Conservatives Pounce” Trope Reveals Journalists’ Homogeneity | National Review

The Media Bias Reflected in Republican Reaction Stories

“Republicans seize on Planned Parenthood video,” (Not, "PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAUGHT SELLING BABY BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT"

Noah Rothman on Twitter

I really hate it when liberalscum use the same tactics as fox news.....

 

[kyzr]

This shit is really funny.

Instead of reporting: "THE OBAMACARE WEBSITE IS A FUCKING TRAINWRECK"

The media and the DIMMS "FRAME" the argument as "REPUBLICANS POUNCE TO EXPLOIT THE ISSUES WITH OBAMACARE WEBSITE."

This way, they can say they covered the bad news about the DIMMS, but it's framed to BLAST Republicans.

Funny tactic....look for it...it's hilariousl

Media Bias: “Conservatives Pounce” Trope Reveals Journalists’ Homogeneity | National Review

The Media Bias Reflected in Republican Reaction Stories

“Republicans seize on Planned Parenthood video,” (Not, "PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAUGHT SELLING BABY BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT"

Noah Rothman on Twitter

I really hate it when liberalscum use the same tactics as fox news.....

MSM coverage of Trump 93% negative vs 60% positive for Obama FXN is the most "fair and balanced news coverage"
Byron York: Harvard study: CNN, NBC Trump coverage 93 percent negative

You may have gotten the impression that the coverage of President Trump is kinda sorta pretty negative.
That’s not quite right: It’s overwhelmingly negative. Stunningly negative. Head-shakingly negative.
That’s according to a new study by Harvard’s Shorenstein Center, a widely respected operation that chronicles media coverage.
And adding to the sharply negative tone is the sheer volume. It’s not your imagination—Donald Trump is the most heavily covered president ever.
The center examined the coverage of Trump’s firs 100 days in three major papers—the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post—and the main newscasts of CBS, NBC, CNN and Fox News.
The top line figure: Some 80 percent of these stories and segments had a negative tone, 20 percent positive (beyond those that were neutral). That is bad. In fact, it’s twice as negative as the coverage of Barack Obama’s first 100 days, and much more negative than that for George W. Bush and Bill Clinton as well.
And the differences are stark when you drill down by news organization.
At CNN and NBC, 93 percent of the stories were negative in tone toward Trump, the study says. Put another way, their main newscasts could find only 7 percent of stories worth being positive toward the president.
CBS wasn’t far behind, at 91 percent negative. Then there was the New York Times (87 percent) and Washington Post (83 percent).
The Wall Street Journal clocked in at 70 percent negative.
And Fox News was, well, fair and balanced. The study found Bret Baier’s “Special Report” to be 52 percent negative and 48 percent positive toward Trump. The network that is often derided by the rest of the media for being too pro-Trump was actually the fairest, according to the Harvard researchers.
What’s more, issues matter. It’s telling that 96 percent of the coverage of immigration was negative, along with 87 percent of the coverage on health care and Russia’s impact on the election. Some 81 percent of the coverage on Trump’s fitness for office was negative. Those are all subjects with a pretty clear media narrative. By contrast, “only” 54 percent of the stories on the economy were negative.
Even in the president’s best week of the period examined, when he ordered airstrikes against Syria, his coverage was 70 percent negative.
Overall, say the researchers, the coverage of President Trump “was negative even by the standards of today’s hyper-critical press.”

 

[ColonelAngus]

This shit is really funny.

Instead of reporting: "THE OBAMACARE WEBSITE IS A FUCKING TRAINWRECK"

The media and the DIMMS "FRAME" the argument as "REPUBLICANS POUNCE TO EXPLOIT THE ISSUES WITH OBAMACARE WEBSITE."

This way, they can say they covered the bad news about the DIMMS, but it's framed to BLAST Republicans.

Funny tactic....look for it...it's hilariousl

Media Bias: “Conservatives Pounce” Trope Reveals Journalists’ Homogeneity | National Review

The Media Bias Reflected in Republican Reaction Stories

“Republicans seize on Planned Parenthood video,” (Not, "PLANNED PARENTHOOD CAUGHT SELLING BABY BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT"

Noah Rothman on Twitter

I really hate it when liberalscum use the same tactics as fox news.....

See this liberal tactic of just saying shit without evidence?

"doesanyoneknowmyname" killed my dog.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Seriously, look for this tactic and laugh at it.

CNN and NYT and WAPO are famous for it.

It happens all the time and is hysterical