ilia25
I can do math
- Jan 12, 2012
- 1,859
- 100
- 48
While giving the Republican Response to the State of the Union, Mitch Daniels repeated the lie about how government spending grew under Obama:
"In three short years, an unprecedented explosion of spending, with borrowed money, has added trillions to an already unaffordable national debt."
Well, that is a blatant lie. Here is how the spending really increased:
As anyone can see in the chart above, the government spending grew under Obama at the same rate they were growing under Bush's 8 years. There was an uptick in 2009 (that was the stimulus package), but since then there was no increase at all.
It is true, that the budget deficit exploded ten-fold around the time when Obama moved to the White House. But the reason for that were falling tax revenues as the economy tanked in the end of 2008 -- not an increase in the spending.
So why respected Republican leaders -- and not just Tea Party nuts -- keep repeating such an obvious lies? That is a good question, but it speaks a lot about the state of US democracy.
"In three short years, an unprecedented explosion of spending, with borrowed money, has added trillions to an already unaffordable national debt."
Well, that is a blatant lie. Here is how the spending really increased:
As anyone can see in the chart above, the government spending grew under Obama at the same rate they were growing under Bush's 8 years. There was an uptick in 2009 (that was the stimulus package), but since then there was no increase at all.
It is true, that the budget deficit exploded ten-fold around the time when Obama moved to the White House. But the reason for that were falling tax revenues as the economy tanked in the end of 2008 -- not an increase in the spending.
So why respected Republican leaders -- and not just Tea Party nuts -- keep repeating such an obvious lies? That is a good question, but it speaks a lot about the state of US democracy.
Last edited: