Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BOOOOOSH did 911. Haven't you heard? So if another 911 happens on your Hopey Changey One's watch,it will be because your Hopey Changey planned and carried it out. You can't have it both ways. This is your guy's show now. If anything happens,it's all on him. This START Treaty doesn't have anything to do with that though. Nice try.
Still doesn't make this Treaty a "Crisis." I think most people are sick of this President and Democrats calling everything a "Crisis." There is no need to ram this thing through. The World will not suddenly explode if it's not rammed through. It can wait till January when the real Congress takes over. This Lame Duck Congress is done. No one cares what they think anymore. No Rubber Stamping. You Democrats of all people should support the Republicans on that.
This is how the Statists operate. Create crisis, create unrest and you help create need for central, authoritarian figures. Read Chomsky, read Allinsky. They have told us how they plan on doing this.
Stopping terrorists was just another phony crisis for the right. You see, it isn't a crisis until after 3,000 human beings fry in jet fuel. Then it is a crisis.
You are talking like the congressional fools who thought saving Americans from 911 wasn't important enough to prevent. Everyday without a treaty is a day the Russiians can avoid inspections of the nuclear arms programs, a real Christmas treat for them and a death bed for you. Like 911, you can perish knowing it was your retards who sent you to an early grave. I wonder if there will be video tapes of people raining down from the sky after the explosion, like 911.
Okay, you are a total dumbass.
LIKE A FREAKING TREATY WITH AL QUEDA WOULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11????????????????
I mean HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
And HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, bringing up 9/11 is a bad way to back up your treaty argument since the situation involved , VIOLATING WEAPONS TREATIES IN AFGHANISTAN!!!!!!!!!!
There were all kinds of weapons used in the Soviet war on Afghanistan that violated treaties. The whole damn thing violated treaties.
How STUPID do you have to be to equate 9/11 with another dumbass Russian TREATY???????????
We have had inspectors before. Just like Saddam, the Russians know how to get around them.
But another paper tiger treaty is going to prevent another 9/11.
YOU are just using this treaty as a distraction against Republicans because they ARE putting domestic business first.
That's obvious, because you OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT when you try to use 9/11 as a evidence for your argument.
You lost that one.
You are an imbecile talking out your ass. Just opening your ass made you Lose this one, Loser!!!
Thar you go Annie. 12 immediate issues that could melt down your family into crispy critters, and Retards think spending your money and tax cuts are more important.
You know you don't fool anyone.
What you are saying, is you are angry Republicans ARE focused on cutting spending extending the Bush tax cuts, instead of getting distracted.
And liberals are ALWAYS TALKING LIKE we are all going to die if the lastest "treaty" with the Soviets/Russians isn't signed.
Well we have signed more of those stupid things than I can count on one hand, AND THE RUSSIANS ALWAYS VIOLATE THEM.
We are the only ones that obey the stupid things and they always weaken US.
It's always Democrats and "moderate Republicans" (aka Rinos) like Ford that were all hot to sign treaties with Russia.
Reagan knew they were a joke and would walk away from the table.
And THE LIBERALS WOULD WHINE AND WRING THEIR HANDS. Oh!!!!! Reagan is going to get us into a war. Oh nuclear war is just a count down a way.
The liberal media had movie after movie about what this country would look like after a nuclear war. We had "Threads." And we had "The Day After." (I think that was it's name).
DIDN'T HAPPEN. Instead, Reagan stayed firm and the Soviet Union fell.
Now, HERE WE GO AGAIN. Another liberal president wants to sign a treaty with Russia, WHICH THEY WILL NEVER OBEY, but it's PEACE IN OUR TIME if it's signed.
But if it isn't, we are all heading for war. Boooooooooooo!
Never changes. You libs always think the answer is the next stupid treaty.
Did Neville Chamberlain never teach you liberals anything?????
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO725Hbzfls[/ame]
Thar you go Annie. 12 immediate issues that could melt down your family into crispy critters, and Retards think spending your money and tax cuts are more important.
You know you don't fool anyone.
What you are saying, is you are angry Republicans ARE focused on cutting spending extending the Bush tax cuts, instead of getting distracted.
And liberals are ALWAYS TALKING LIKE we are all going to die if the lastest "treaty" with the Soviets/Russians isn't signed.
Well we have signed more of those stupid things than I can count on one hand, AND THE RUSSIANS ALWAYS VIOLATE THEM.
We are the only ones that obey the stupid things and they always weaken US.
It's always Democrats and "moderate Republicans" (aka Rinos) like Ford that were all hot to sign treaties with Russia.
Reagan knew they were a joke and would walk away from the table.
And THE LIBERALS WOULD WHINE AND WRING THEIR HANDS. Oh!!!!! Reagan is going to get us into a war. Oh nuclear war is just a count down a way.
The liberal media had movie after movie about what this country would look like after a nuclear war. We had "Threads." And we had "The Day After." (I think that was it's name).
DIDN'T HAPPEN. Instead, Reagan stayed firm and the Soviet Union fell.
Now, HERE WE GO AGAIN. Another liberal president wants to sign a treaty with Russia, WHICH THEY WILL NEVER OBEY, but it's PEACE IN OUR TIME if it's signed.
But if it isn't, we are all heading for war. Boooooooooooo!
Never changes. You libs always think the answer is the next stupid treaty.
Did Neville Chamberlain never teach you liberals anything?????
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO725Hbzfls[/ame]
This post above is total revisionist bullshit. Yep, I'm calling you on it. The Gipper wasn't some badass who was better than his legislature. Sometimes you talk things out...sometimes you dont. Even Congressional liberals have done that. To inflate Ronnie to some demi-god status makes you sound imbecilic.
What you're failing to grasp is that the irony that what Reagan fought for is being trampled simply because it's got Obama's name attached to it. Conservatives tried to stonewall healthcare and make it Obama's Waterloo. Now you're trying to stonewall everything else that is even close to being tied to him. Even when YOUR OWN party member says it's important.
Stop playing politics and do what's right for the country.
With all due respect, this statement was misleading and disingenuous. Ronald Reagans long-term vision of a world without nuclear weapons presupposed a robust missile defensethe Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)that would render offensive nuclear weapons directed at the U.S. obsolete. Reagans world view was buttressed by confidence in Americas leading role in the world. As such, Reagan always dealt with the Soviet Union from a position of strength. This included a robust nuclear modernization program, including the B-1 and B-2 bombers, filling out the Trident submarine fleet and its Submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBMs) and the MX or Peacekeeper missile.
The Obama Administration, in contrast, has taken a different approach. Amidst a constant barrage of Russian demands, it canceled the Bush-era European missile defense and has sought to reduce total missile defense funding by $1.62 billion in its FY 2010 Budget Request. In December 2009, the Administration acquiesced to the reduction in missile defense spendingnearly a 15 percent decline from the FY 2009 appropriation of $10.92 billion.)
After the cancellation of the Bush-era missile defense system, both President Dmitri Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin pocketed the concessions, smiled, and demanded new ones. Russian president Dmitri Medvedev praised the decision saying, We appreciate this responsible move by the U.S. president toward realizing our agreement I am prepared to continue the dialogue. Prime Minister Putin said that other US concessions should ensue: I expect that after this correct and brave decision, others will follow
More than 25 years ago, President Ronald Reagan challenged the U.S. scientific community to develop antiballistic missile technologies that would improve our national security and reduce our reliance on nuclear weapons. Today, the Missile Defense Agency, or MDA, is answering that challenge.
You didnt kick my ass. You repeated your own bullshit. There's a difference. The fact that you quote sources that state facts is great. I like facts. It's your SPIN on the facts that is stupid as fuck.
You make sweeping generalizations about liberals and stupid comments about the treaty itself. None of which are backed up by the stupid shit you copy and paste.
BTW...I'm not liberal. I'm a centrist. Might try reading.
What a joke!
