Republicans Admit They Have No Fact Witnesses. Trump Did It

[bigrebnc1775]

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

Again, your party tried to depose a LEGITIMATELY elected president over a blow job, after Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

Trump is obviously guilty, the only question is, do the Republicans say it's okay for the President to break the law.

that president actually committed crimes

 

[JoeB131]

THEN BIDEN IS GUILTY OF BRIBERY

If there is nothing behind Burisma then dig away

There is nothing behind Burisma, but even if there was, Trump was still out of line.

 

[JoeB131]

that president actually committed crimes

So let me get this straight... Lying about a blow job is a crime, but shaking down a foreign leader for your personal gain isn't?

 

[mudwhistle]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

Obviously this is your opinion.
They have a shitload of evidence.....but Shifty-Schiff won't allow it to come out. He feels he has the right to say what evidence can be used in his fake impeachment. The President has a right to mount a defense....except in this fake impeachment.....which means it's not real.

 

[mudwhistle]

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

Again, your party tried to depose a LEGITIMATELY elected president over a blow job, after Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

Trump is obviously guilty, the only question is, do the Republicans say it's okay for the President to break the law.

that president actually committed crimes

You just can't name any.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

that president actually committed crimes

So let me get this straight... Lying about a blow job is a crime, but shaking down a foreign leader for your personal gain isn't?

Obstruction witness tampering are crimes bad enough he lost his law license

 

[bigrebnc1775]

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

Again, your party tried to depose a LEGITIMATELY elected president over a blow job, after Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

Trump is obviously guilty, the only question is, do the Republicans say it's okay for the President to break the law.

that president actually committed crimes

You just can't name any.

I named two of the six or was it 9 charges

 

[keepitreal]

THEN BIDEN IS GUILTY OF BRIBERY

If there is nothing behind Burisma then dig away

There is nothing behind Burisma, but even if there was, Trump was still out of line.

There IS plenty behind Burisma

No, Trump was not out of line

 

[Third Party]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

 

[joaquinmiller]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

The essential elements of extortion and bribery are quid pro quo's. Otherwise, what would be the point?

 

[Third Party]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

The essential elements of extortion and bribery are quid pro quo's. Otherwise, what would be the point?

You are correct-there is no point!

 

[joaquinmiller]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

The essential elements of extortion and bribery are quid pro quo's. Otherwise, what would be the point?

You are correct-there is no point!

I was correct, period, your nonsensical addition notwithstanding.

 

[Snouter]

Odd that the mods did not move this to "Conspiracy Theories."

 

[Third Party]

There was no crime. There was no quid pro quo. There was no impeachable offense. Ergo, there are NO witnesses. Get your head out of the "I hate Trump" zone. It ruins your judgement.

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

The essential elements of extortion and bribery are quid pro quo's. Otherwise, what would be the point?

You are correct-there is no point!

I was correct, period, your nonsensical addition notwithstanding.

You were correct, nothing plus nothing equals nothing-simple addition, not nonsensical.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Nope - No quid pro quo .. Just extortion and bribery. Get over it!

Russia changed from collusion to conspiracy. Now we go from qpq to ex and bri? The Dems keep rolling dice with words until something comes up they like. The American citizen is the one being cheated.

The essential elements of extortion and bribery are quid pro quo's. Otherwise, what would be the point?

You are correct-there is no point!

I was correct, period, your nonsensical addition notwithstanding.

You were correct, nothing plus nothing equals nothing-simple addition, not nonsensical.

Ah. I see you're going with a studied stupidity. Hi-ho.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It’s now referred to as bribery and extortion. Sounds worse. Still bullshit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[joaquinmiller]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It’s now referred to as bribery and extortion. Sounds worse. Still bullshit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What words would you use to describe releasing blocked funding in exchange for a public announcement of an investigation?

 

[mudwhistle]

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

Again, your party tried to depose a LEGITIMATELY elected president over a blow job, after Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties.

Trump is obviously guilty, the only question is, do the Republicans say it's okay for the President to break the law.

that president actually committed crimes

You just can't name any.

I named two of the six or was it 9 charges

Name em again so I can laugh at your dumb ass.

 

[BrokeLoser]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

Republicans Admit They Have No Fact Witnesses. Trump Did It
I’m sure it’s already been asked...why would Republicans need witnesses when they have a call transcript and an account from Ukraine’s prez...both completely exonerate Trump?

 

[mudwhistle]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

Republicans Admit They Have No Fact Witnesses. Trump Did It
I’m sure it’s already been asked...why would Republicans need witnesses when they have a call transcript and an account from Ukraine’s prez...both completely exonerate Trump?

The problem is Shifty-Schiff won't allow Republicans to call any witnesses.....so the lemmings on the left eqate this to not having any.