Republican-led attempt to block Iran deal fails in Senate

[rightwinger]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

 

[Kosh]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

Yep just like they lined up on the wrong side of History in 1964 Civil Rights Bill, right far left drone?

 

[Slyhunter]

No one is helping our enemies, except the far right's stupid and verbal hate.

The deal is better than no deal. It delays their getting the bomb to five to eight years instead of in time for Easter next year.

Seal their country, bomb them back to the 19th century and then we'll have a deal we can live with.

 

[Slyhunter]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

 

[rightwinger]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

The Democrats WERE in charge

 

[JakeStarkey]

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

Umm, they were and Hitler died.

 

[Slyhunter]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

The Democrats WERE in charge

The Democrats of today would've stayed out of the war and allowed all the Jews to die.

 

[paulitician]

Not much of an attempt. As usual, a half-hearted effort. Sums up Boehner and McConnell's 'leadership' perfectly.

 

[rightwinger]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

The Democrats WERE in charge

The Democrats of today would've stayed out of the war and allowed all the Jews to die.

Todays Democrats are bombing the shit out of terrorists using drones. Todays Democrats hunted down and killed bin Laden

 

[JakeStarkey]

All those clowns on the right know how to do is their FEAR MONGERING, they try to scare people into voting for them because they HAVE NOTING ELSE..

In Iraq it was:

Orange alert

We have to fight them over there so they don't come here

The Mushroom cloud is coming

Saddam has WMD's

Vote for the Repukes or they will all come over here and kill us..

This Iran deal is NO different!!

Once again, Republicans line up on the wrong side of history

All they can do is sit and pout

If the Democrats were in charge Hitler would've been victorious.

The Democrats WERE in charge

The Democrats of today would've stayed out of the war and allowed all the Jews to die.

That's false, but many of our libertarians and some of our atheist conservatives would surely allow the Jews to die.

 

[BIG YANK BAL 1976]

Another Obama win against those fucking clowns drunk Bohner, and McConnell, he's been pistol whipping the shit out of those cock suckers this year and I'm loving every minute of it, Same sex marriage, the ACA, now this..

Expect those assholes Repukes and Tea Maggots, to shut down the Government again, please do it!!

Ironic how those right wing clowns hate the Gubmint so much, but rely on it to fund their losing wars, Iraq, Afghanistan ring a bell?

That's a very odd take on the matter.

Let me guess... you are not American. Chineese, NK? ?

Another Obama win against those fucking clowns drunk Bohner, and McConnell, he's been pistol whipping the shit out of those cock suckers this year and I'm loving every minute of it, Same sex marriage, the ACA, now this..

Expect those assholes Repukes and Tea Maggots, to shut down the Government again, please do it!!

Ironic how those right wing clowns hate the Gubmint so much, but rely on it to fund their losing wars, Iraq, Afghanistan ring a bell?

That's a very odd take on the matter.

Let me guess... you are not American. Chineese, NK? ?

Nothing odd about it at all..

I was born in California in 1976, im just as American as you are..

Your not very good at GUESSING, dude..

 

[BIG YANK BAL 1976]

Another Obama win against those fucking clowns drunk Bohner, and McConnell, he's been pistol whipping the shit out of those cock suckers this year and I'm loving every minute of it, Same sex marriage, the ACA, now this..

Expect those assholes Repukes and Tea Maggots, to shut down the Government again, please do it!!

Ironic how those right wing clowns hate the Gubmint so much, but rely on it to fund their losing wars, Iraq, Afghanistan ring a bell?

That's a very odd take on the matter.

Let me guess... you are not American. Chineese, NK? ?

What's odd about ti??

I was born in California 1976, just as American as you are.

 

[Nicholas_1982]

What is important is the future The next generation of progressive Iranians. Those currently in power represent the hard line but they will not hold power forever. By lifting sanctions and working with Iran we are extending an olive branch that hopefully will generate more moderate relations with the next generation of leaders.

And whoever believes we do not negotiate with terrorist states you are factually mistake. We armed Iraq then had to defend Kuwait from the very people we armed. Same with Afghanistan, we armed them to fight the soviets then we had to come back and fight the very people we armed. U.S. foreign policy is based on money, selling guns to evil people to make money then coming back and declaring war on the evil people we sold guns to. its been happening for 40 years

Interesting spin on history. When did we arm Iraq? The Mujahidin weren't terrorists or enemies of the US, they were fighting the communists.

But you started out even more idiotic as hard as it is to believe. Making a deal with the people that have helped kill many of our soldiers and as late as two weeks ago sworn that no Israel will exist in the near future is not a smart move no matter how you try to spin it. No one with half a brain helps their enemy in the hopes that their replacement will look fondly on it.

We didn't train and fund Iraqis against Iran? Check your history mate. The Mujahidin were not terrorists? Osama bin Laden was one of the main figureheads of the Mujahidin in its fight against the Soviets. All that money and military hardware we pumped into the Mujahidin in the early 1980's then to have bin Laden split off in 1988 to form Al Qaeda taking many of the soldiers we trained and funded.

Iceweasel, open a history book or go to Wikipedia and look up the role of the U.S. in the Iran - Iraq conflict or how the Mujahidin morphed into Al Qaeda. The U.S. role in funding these enemies of ours is well documented. U.S. military policy has been to go to war with groups we prop up and fund. This isn't some conspiracy theory

 

[Iceweasel]

What is important is the future The next generation of progressive Iranians. Those currently in power represent the hard line but they will not hold power forever. By lifting sanctions and working with Iran we are extending an olive branch that hopefully will generate more moderate relations with the next generation of leaders.

And whoever believes we do not negotiate with terrorist states you are factually mistake. We armed Iraq then had to defend Kuwait from the very people we armed. Same with Afghanistan, we armed them to fight the soviets then we had to come back and fight the very people we armed. U.S. foreign policy is based on money, selling guns to evil people to make money then coming back and declaring war on the evil people we sold guns to. its been happening for 40 years

Interesting spin on history. When did we arm Iraq? The Mujahidin weren't terrorists or enemies of the US, they were fighting the communists.

But you started out even more idiotic as hard as it is to believe. Making a deal with the people that have helped kill many of our soldiers and as late as two weeks ago sworn that no Israel will exist in the near future is not a smart move no matter how you try to spin it. No one with half a brain helps their enemy in the hopes that their replacement will look fondly on it.

We didn't train and fund Iraqis against Iran? Check your history mate. The Mujahidin were not terrorists? Osama bin Laden was one of the main figureheads of the Mujahidin in its fight against the Soviets. All that money and military hardware we pumped into the Mujahidin in the early 1980's then to have bin Laden split off in 1988 to form Al Qaeda taking many of the soldiers we trained and funded.

Iceweasel, open a history book or go to Wikipedia and look up the role of the U.S. in the Iran - Iraq conflict or how the Mujahidin morphed into Al Qaeda. The U.S. role in funding these enemies of ours is well documented. U.S. military policy has been to go to war with groups we prop up and fund. This isn't some conspiracy theory

Check your history, go to Wikipedia, read a book, watch TV, blah blah blah. That's all you stupid assholes have. YOU back up your claims. You didn't because you can't.

 

[Slyhunter]

What is important is the future The next generation of progressive Iranians. Those currently in power represent the hard line but they will not hold power forever. By lifting sanctions and working with Iran we are extending an olive branch that hopefully will generate more moderate relations with the next generation of leaders.

And whoever believes we do not negotiate with terrorist states you are factually mistake. We armed Iraq then had to defend Kuwait from the very people we armed. Same with Afghanistan, we armed them to fight the soviets then we had to come back and fight the very people we armed. U.S. foreign policy is based on money, selling guns to evil people to make money then coming back and declaring war on the evil people we sold guns to. its been happening for 40 years

Interesting spin on history. When did we arm Iraq? The Mujahidin weren't terrorists or enemies of the US, they were fighting the communists.

But you started out even more idiotic as hard as it is to believe. Making a deal with the people that have helped kill many of our soldiers and as late as two weeks ago sworn that no Israel will exist in the near future is not a smart move no matter how you try to spin it. No one with half a brain helps their enemy in the hopes that their replacement will look fondly on it.

We didn't train and fund Iraqis against Iran? Check your history mate. The Mujahidin were not terrorists? Osama bin Laden was one of the main figureheads of the Mujahidin in its fight against the Soviets. All that money and military hardware we pumped into the Mujahidin in the early 1980's then to have bin Laden split off in 1988 to form Al Qaeda taking many of the soldiers we trained and funded.

Iceweasel, open a history book or go to Wikipedia and look up the role of the U.S. in the Iran - Iraq conflict or how the Mujahidin morphed into Al Qaeda. The U.S. role in funding these enemies of ours is well documented. U.S. military policy has been to go to war with groups we prop up and fund. This isn't some conspiracy theory

Check your history, go to Wikipedia, read a book, watch TV, blah blah blah. That's all you stupid assholes have. YOU back up your claims. You didn't because you can't.

backup yours.

 

[Iceweasel]

What is important is the future The next generation of progressive Iranians. Those currently in power represent the hard line but they will not hold power forever. By lifting sanctions and working with Iran we are extending an olive branch that hopefully will generate more moderate relations with the next generation of leaders.

And whoever believes we do not negotiate with terrorist states you are factually mistake. We armed Iraq then had to defend Kuwait from the very people we armed. Same with Afghanistan, we armed them to fight the soviets then we had to come back and fight the very people we armed. U.S. foreign policy is based on money, selling guns to evil people to make money then coming back and declaring war on the evil people we sold guns to. its been happening for 40 years

Interesting spin on history. When did we arm Iraq? The Mujahidin weren't terrorists or enemies of the US, they were fighting the communists.

But you started out even more idiotic as hard as it is to believe. Making a deal with the people that have helped kill many of our soldiers and as late as two weeks ago sworn that no Israel will exist in the near future is not a smart move no matter how you try to spin it. No one with half a brain helps their enemy in the hopes that their replacement will look fondly on it.

We didn't train and fund Iraqis against Iran? Check your history mate. The Mujahidin were not terrorists? Osama bin Laden was one of the main figureheads of the Mujahidin in its fight against the Soviets. All that money and military hardware we pumped into the Mujahidin in the early 1980's then to have bin Laden split off in 1988 to form Al Qaeda taking many of the soldiers we trained and funded.

Iceweasel, open a history book or go to Wikipedia and look up the role of the U.S. in the Iran - Iraq conflict or how the Mujahidin morphed into Al Qaeda. The U.S. role in funding these enemies of ours is well documented. U.S. military policy has been to go to war with groups we prop up and fund. This isn't some conspiracy theory

Check your history, go to Wikipedia, read a book, watch TV, blah blah blah. That's all you stupid assholes have. YOU back up your claims. You didn't because you can't.

backup yours.

You said we armed Iraq and Afghan terrorists, you couldn't back it up.

 

[Slyhunter]

What is important is the future The next generation of progressive Iranians. Those currently in power represent the hard line but they will not hold power forever. By lifting sanctions and working with Iran we are extending an olive branch that hopefully will generate more moderate relations with the next generation of leaders.

And whoever believes we do not negotiate with terrorist states you are factually mistake. We armed Iraq then had to defend Kuwait from the very people we armed. Same with Afghanistan, we armed them to fight the soviets then we had to come back and fight the very people we armed. U.S. foreign policy is based on money, selling guns to evil people to make money then coming back and declaring war on the evil people we sold guns to. its been happening for 40 years

Interesting spin on history. When did we arm Iraq? The Mujahidin weren't terrorists or enemies of the US, they were fighting the communists.

But you started out even more idiotic as hard as it is to believe. Making a deal with the people that have helped kill many of our soldiers and as late as two weeks ago sworn that no Israel will exist in the near future is not a smart move no matter how you try to spin it. No one with half a brain helps their enemy in the hopes that their replacement will look fondly on it.

We didn't train and fund Iraqis against Iran? Check your history mate. The Mujahidin were not terrorists? Osama bin Laden was one of the main figureheads of the Mujahidin in its fight against the Soviets. All that money and military hardware we pumped into the Mujahidin in the early 1980's then to have bin Laden split off in 1988 to form Al Qaeda taking many of the soldiers we trained and funded.

Iceweasel, open a history book or go to Wikipedia and look up the role of the U.S. in the Iran - Iraq conflict or how the Mujahidin morphed into Al Qaeda. The U.S. role in funding these enemies of ours is well documented. U.S. military policy has been to go to war with groups we prop up and fund. This isn't some conspiracy theory

Check your history, go to Wikipedia, read a book, watch TV, blah blah blah. That's all you stupid assholes have. YOU back up your claims. You didn't because you can't.

backup yours.

You said we armed Iraq and Afghan terrorists, you couldn't back it up.

I misspoke. Thought you said something else.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

The most important thing here is that Obama wins. But what does that mean? A victory over the natural democratic process that exist in democracy? I think that this is closer to the truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Check your history, go to Wikipedia, read a book, watch TV, blah blah blah. That's all you stupid assholes have. YOU back up your claims. You didn't because you can't.

No one has to refute your claims, weaseldick, until you offer some solid evidence.

You haven't so far, so you lose.

And: go read some real history.

 

[rightwinger]

The most important thing here is that Obama wins. But what does that mean? A victory over the natural democratic process that exist in democracy? I think that this is closer to the truth.

The natural democratic process elected Obama President and gave him executive powers

The natural democratic process in congress didn't have the votes to overrule him