Republican Admits To Paying Male Prostitute But Says “I’m Not Gay”, LMAO!

This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?
 
Last edited:
The left sure has a sick OBSESSION with homosexuals. yet they like to tell us they CARE more about them.

We are not the ones who like to talk about gay sex and "shoving it down our throats" around here, Stephanie. :eusa_whistle:

You all are the ones who always start these types of stupid threads. You will use a homosexual as a weapon against others. You don't give a shit about the PERSON who is a homosexual..
 
Liberal/Democrats do seem to be obsessed with the gay thing. What's up with that? Just an observation anyway. I also think this OP is just projecting. Still in the closet i guess.

Yea, because liberals are the ones who want to make gay marriage a felony and vote on gay rights.:cuckoo:
 
The left sure has a sick OBSESSION with homosexuals. yet they like to tell us they CARE more about them.

We are not the ones who like to talk about gay sex and "shoving it down our throats" around here, Stephanie. :eusa_whistle:

You all are the ones who always start these types of stupid threads. You will use a homosexual as a weapon against others. You don't give a shit about the PERSON who is a homosexual..

But Republicans and conservatives do? Hilarious!

Oh that's right, they want to "save" them.
 
This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

These ass-clown Board liberals (which is to say the loud mouth braying jackasses; not all Board liberals qualify) wouldn't comment on President Obama's homosexuality if he turned up in a gay porn video with his tongue stuck down Barney Frank's throat.

The difference? He's a Democratic!
 
This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.
 
This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

These ass-clown Board liberals (which is to say the loud mouth braying jackasses; not all Board liberals qualify) wouldn't comment on President Obama's homosexuality if he turned up in a gay porn video with his tongue stuck down Barney Frank's throat.

The difference? He's a Democratic!

If Obama championed for the Defense of Marriage Act, a staunch homophobic who argued about slippery slopes towards bestiality, polygamy and pedophilia, sure it would be hilarious.
 
He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

These ass-clown Board liberals (which is to say the loud mouth braying jackasses; not all Board liberals qualify) wouldn't comment on President Obama's homosexuality if he turned up in a gay porn video with his tongue stuck down Barney Frank's throat.

The difference? He's a Democratic!

If Obama championed for the Defense of Marriage Act, a staunch homophobic who argued about slippery slopes towards bestiality, polygamy and pedophilia, sure it would be hilarious.

If Obama championed DOMA, gay marriage would be pushed through Congress by the GOP tomorrow.
 
He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.


Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.
 
He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.


Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

The first one is called church.
 
Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.


Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

The first one is called church.

That's the only reason a liberal would object. Otherwise, it's not considered newsworthy.
 
Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

The first one is called church.

That's the only reason a liberal would object. Otherwise, it's not considered newsworthy.

I'm pretty sure murder, rape and pedophilia is a big no-no for everyone. I don't think anyone gets a pass due to their sexuality.
 
He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.


Yes, we know. That's the whole point.

On the other hand, if a gay couple adopted a child and then sodomized him for several years, you wouldn't say a thing. If some homosexuals murdered an adolescent in some sick homo orgy, you also wouldn't say a thing. Both of these events have occurred more than once.

What the fuck's the matter with you?
 
The first one is called church.

That's the only reason a liberal would object. Otherwise, it's not considered newsworthy.

I'm pretty sure murder, rape and pedophilia is a big no-no for everyone. I don't think anyone gets a pass due to their sexuality.

You're wrong about that.

Two rednecks beat a homo to death: front page news for months and even years

Two homo perverts rape, torture and murder an adolescent: It's on page 64 of Section D.
 
This same Hinkle guy voted against gay marriage but solicited a homosexual for a "good time," smart, very smart of him.

He's nothing more than a state representative in Indiana. When the local assistant dog catcher turns out to be gay and Republican, are all you liberal turds going to make a federal case out of that as well?

Only if they're married and parrot the "family values" slogans.

So what? haven't homosexuals been MARRIED and lived a family values life, then left their family because they REALIZED they would rather be a full fledged homosexual. you people and your, they parrot "family values" is just a real joke. You USE HOMSEXUALS as a weapon, that is why many people have a low opinion of them. BECAUSE OF YOU ALL
 
That's the only reason a liberal would object. Otherwise, it's not considered newsworthy.

I'm pretty sure murder, rape and pedophilia is a big no-no for everyone. I don't think anyone gets a pass due to their sexuality.

You're wrong about that.

Two rednecks beat a homo to death: front page news for months and even years

Two homo perverts rape, torture and murder an adolescent: It's on page 64 of Section D.

If they're both in the paper, they both were prosecuted presumably. No one's still advocating people being able to get away with things based on their sexuality.

I know your hobby is building strawmen, but I have to point out to you, they are very easy to knock down.
 

Forum List

Back
Top