whitehall
Diamond Member
First you gotta repeal the 1st Amendment freedom of speech to make it easier to repeal the 2nd Amendment and you can bet your ass that democrats are working on it..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are a liar. Again.I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.
The right wing usually doesn't understand the issue.But the question still needs to be asked: Why does the left detest other people's Second Amendment rights, while at the same time holding their own First Amendment rights in such high regard?
Has any despotic regime in history ever been deposed by a bunch of unwashed people blowing plastic horns, waving signs, and wearing pink pussy hats on their heads?
You are a liar. Again.I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.
Opinion | Repeal the Second Amendment
Inevitability or pipe dream?: Meet the Second Amendment repealists
Michael Moore Calls for Repeal of 'Ancient & Outdated' 2nd Amendment
Why It's Time to Repeal the Second Amendment
Katy Tur Suggests Repealing 2nd Amendment Should Be Democrats' End Goal
We don't need the 2nd Amendment — we need a real debate about guns
Daily Kos: Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA)
Leave things as they are, no new frivolous laws needed. Progressives are bat shit crazy stupid on the subject.I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.
Yeah, i know you do. But you aren't exactly a sane thinker. As the Gator said. Zealots like yourself can't be taken seriously whether they are on the Left or the Right.Anything you guys come up with is not right, when it comes to so called gun reform. When I hear you say gun reform i hear firearm confiscation/firearm registration... nice try thoughUh some do, sure, they are called wingnuts, they think just like you but on the opposite side... See, you are trying to generalize and put everybody who supports gun reform in that basket and that just isn't reality... nice try though.Progressives can not be trusted, They have no tolerance of those they disagree with. FactYeah right. what you just said is the real dog whistle. Don't listen to anything that has to do with reform because it secretly means repeal. What a joke.Every time anyone calls for so called “universal background checks”... its a dog whistle.Can you post a link to someone calling for the repeal of the 2nd amendment?
The drumbeat is in your head asshole. See a neurologist.It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol
STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.
STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
- Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
- Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
- Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
- Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.
So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol
STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.
STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
- Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
- Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
- Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
- Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.
There is no loopholeLeave things as they are, no new frivolous laws needed. Progressives are bat shit crazy stupid on the subject.I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.
It is not frivolous to close a loophole in a law.
Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol
STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.
STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
- Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
- Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
- Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
- Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.
Oh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..lRight Obama did that. Oh wait...Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation
Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagreeLeave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol
STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.
STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
- Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
- Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
- Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
- Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.
Loads of Executive ordersOh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..lRight Obama did that. Oh wait...Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation
So in other words he didn’t? Got it.Loads of Executive ordersOh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..lRight Obama did that. Oh wait...Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation
Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagreeLeave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol
STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.
STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
- Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
- Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
- Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
- Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.
Do you have trouble walking and chewing gum?Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagreeLeave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.
2017 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Shit happens, more fucked up laws will increase violenceDo you have trouble walking and chewing gum?Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagreeLeave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.So now you think you’re a psychic too.Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.
2017 Real Time Death Statistics in America
An all out firearm confiscation would result in millions dead on both sides, Our military/law enforcement is overwhelmingly pro second amendment.Let me make it very clear I am vehemently opposed to repealing the Second Amenment. I am of the "cold dead fingers" variety.
However, it cannot be denied that a nationwide ban on guns would result in a reduction in homicides. The tards will try to deny this, but it is a fact.
By denying this fact, the tards are being self-defeating. Denying the truth may result in short term gains, but inevitably the truth catches up and a lot more ground is lost.
So we should acknowledge some truths if we are to win in the long run. And it is a truth that a nationwide gun ban would save lives
Now...
If this is a fact, then would someone please outline a way we could accomplish the same goal WITHOUT repealing the Second Amendment.
If you want to win in the long run, you have to present the superior idea to reach the same goal.
Otherwise, our country is going to lose in the long run. We will lose our guns. It's just a matter of time.