Repealing the second amendment...

[whitehall]

First you gotta repeal the 1st Amendment freedom of speech to make it easier to repeal the 2nd Amendment and you can bet your ass that democrats are working on it..

 

[miketx]

I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.

You are a liar. Again.



Opinion | Repeal the Second Amendment

Inevitability or pipe dream?: Meet the Second Amendment repealists

Michael Moore Calls for Repeal of 'Ancient & Outdated' 2nd Amendment

Why It's Time to Repeal the Second Amendment

Katy Tur Suggests Repealing 2nd Amendment Should Be Democrats' End Goal

We don't need the 2nd Amendment — we need a real debate about guns

Daily Kos: Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA)

 

[danielpalos]

But the question still needs to be asked: Why does the left detest other people's Second Amendment rights, while at the same time holding their own First Amendment rights in such high regard?

Has any despotic regime in history ever been deposed by a bunch of unwashed people blowing plastic horns, waving signs, and wearing pink pussy hats on their heads?

The right wing usually doesn't understand the issue.

Well regulated militia of the People have literal recourse to our Second Amendment; Only the unorganized militia complains about it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.

You are a liar. Again.



Opinion | Repeal the Second Amendment

Inevitability or pipe dream?: Meet the Second Amendment repealists

Michael Moore Calls for Repeal of 'Ancient & Outdated' 2nd Amendment

Why It's Time to Repeal the Second Amendment

Katy Tur Suggests Repealing 2nd Amendment Should Be Democrats' End Goal

We don't need the 2nd Amendment — we need a real debate about guns

Daily Kos: Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA)

There is NO WAY to get enough votes to repeal the 2nd Amendment.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.

Leave things as they are, no new frivolous laws needed. Progressives are bat shit crazy stupid on the subject.

It is not frivolous to close a loophole in a law.

 

[Slade3200]

Can you post a link to someone calling for the repeal of the 2nd amendment?

Every time anyone calls for so called “universal background checks”... its a dog whistle.

Yeah right. what you just said is the real dog whistle. Don't listen to anything that has to do with reform because it secretly means repeal. What a joke.

Progressives can not be trusted, They have no tolerance of those they disagree with. Fact

Uh some do, sure, they are called wingnuts, they think just like you but on the opposite side... See, you are trying to generalize and put everybody who supports gun reform in that basket and that just isn't reality... nice try though.

Anything you guys come up with is not right, when it comes to so called gun reform. When I hear you say gun reform i hear firearm confiscation/firearm registration... nice try though

Yeah, i know you do. But you aren't exactly a sane thinker. As the Gator said. Zealots like yourself can't be taken seriously whether they are on the Left or the Right.

 

[Reasonable]

It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol

STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.

• Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
• Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.

STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.

• Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or

• Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.

The drumbeat is in your head asshole. See a neurologist.

 

[Reasonable]

It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol

STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.

• Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
• Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.

STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.

• Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or

• Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.

Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

 

[Rustic]

I don't think the OP realizes that his thread is an excellent argument as to why the people who fearmonger about the 2nd Amendment being repealed do not have a leg to stand on.

Leave things as they are, no new frivolous laws needed. Progressives are bat shit crazy stupid on the subject.

It is not frivolous to close a loophole in a law.

There is no loophole

 

[Rustic]

It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol

STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.

• Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
• Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.

STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.

• Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or

• Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.

Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.

 

[Billy000]

Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation

Right Obama did that. Oh wait...

He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..l

Oh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.

 

[Slade3200]

It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol

STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.

• Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
• Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.

STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.

• Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or

• Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.

Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.

Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagree

 

[Rustic]

Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation

Right Obama did that. Oh wait...

He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..l

Oh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.

Loads of Executive orders

 

[Billy000]

Universal background checks/firearm registration is dog Whistle for firearm confiscation

Right Obama did that. Oh wait...

He wanted too, thanks to organizations like the NRA(although they need to be more hard line) stopped the cowardly motherfuckers in their tracks..l

Oh yeah? When did he propose such a thing? Give me a real quote.

Loads of Executive orders

So in other words he didn’t? Got it.

 

[Rustic]

It seems the drumbeat is on again... well good luck. Lol

STEP 1: PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
Either Congress or the states can propose an amendment to the Constitution.

• Both houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
• Two-thirds of the state legislatures must call on Congress to hold a constitutional convention.

STEP 2. RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.

• Three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or

• Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition with the 21st Amendment.

Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.

Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagree

Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.
2017 Real Time Death Statistics in America

 

[Slade3200]

Why do you people have this delusion that the left wants to repeal the 2nd amendment?

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.

Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagree

Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.
2017 Real Time Death Statistics in America

Do you have trouble walking and chewing gum?

 

[Rustic]

Every time They bring up universal background checks that’s what that means…

So now you think you’re a psychic too.
You don’t have one valid point. Not one.
Go take a nap.

Leave things the way they are, we don’t need anymore frivolous laws.

Well that’s the debate isn’t it? Many agree with you and many disagree

Firearm violence is a non-issue in this country… we have much bigger fish to fry.
2017 Real Time Death Statistics in America

Do you have trouble walking and chewing gum?

Shit happens, more fucked up laws will increase violence

 

[g5000]

Let me make it very clear I am vehemently opposed to repealing the Second Amenment. I am of the "cold dead fingers" variety.

However, it cannot be denied that a nationwide ban on guns would result in a reduction in homicides. The tards will try to deny this, but it is a fact.

By denying this fact, the tards are being self-defeating. Denying the truth may result in short term gains, but inevitably the truth catches up and a lot more ground is lost.

So we should acknowledge some truths if we are to win in the long run. And it is a truth that a nationwide gun ban would save lives

Now...

If this is a fact, then would someone please outline a way we could accomplish the same goal WITHOUT repealing the Second Amendment.

If you want to win in the long run, you have to present the superior idea to reach the same goal.

Otherwise, our country is going to lose in the long run. We will lose our guns. It's just a matter of time.

 

[danielpalos]

Better aqueducts, better roads, and more well regulated militia. It is always a solution.

 

[Rustic]

Let me make it very clear I am vehemently opposed to repealing the Second Amenment. I am of the "cold dead fingers" variety.

However, it cannot be denied that a nationwide ban on guns would result in a reduction in homicides. The tards will try to deny this, but it is a fact.

By denying this fact, the tards are being self-defeating. Denying the truth may result in short term gains, but inevitably the truth catches up and a lot more ground is lost.

So we should acknowledge some truths if we are to win in the long run. And it is a truth that a nationwide gun ban would save lives

Now...

If this is a fact, then would someone please outline a way we could accomplish the same goal WITHOUT repealing the Second Amendment.

If you want to win in the long run, you have to present the superior idea to reach the same goal.

Otherwise, our country is going to lose in the long run. We will lose our guns. It's just a matter of time.

An all out firearm confiscation would result in millions dead on both sides, Our military/law enforcement is overwhelmingly pro second amendment.