Zone1 Reparations are coming and there is nothing you can do to stop it

Status
Not open for further replies.
A little strong, but true.
If the Negroes pay us back for decades of welfare, decades of stealing stuff, the cost of their 2020 BLM Insurrection, all the race riots in the 1960s and promise to never vote for Democrats again then maybe, just maybe, we can discuss reparations.
 
Read em and weep. Reparations are coming and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

“No power on earth can stop an idea whose time has come.”
— Victor Hugo

View attachment 895892
Patriots

California introduces first-in-nation slavery reparations package​

California state lawmakers introduced a slate of reparations bills on Wednesday, including a proposal to restore property taken by “race-based” cases of eminent domain and a potentially unconstitutional measure to provide state funding for “specific groups.”

The package marks a first-in-the-nation effort to give restitution to Black Americans who have been harmed by centuries of racist policies and practices. California’s legislative push is the culmination of years of research and debate, including 111-pages of recommendations issued last year by a task force.

Not included is any type of financial compensation to descendants of Black slaves, a polarizing proposal that has received a cool response from many state Democrats, including Gov. Gavin Newsom.

“While many only associate direct cash payments with reparations, the true meaning of the word, to repair, involves much more,” Assemblymember Lori Wilson, chair of the caucus, said in a statement. “We need a comprehensive approach to dismantling the legacy of slavery and systemic racism.”

/——/ California never allowed slavery. No slaves were held there. So who was harmed?
 
If the Negroes pay us back for decades of welfare, decades of stealing stuff, the cost of their 2020 BLM Insurrection, all the race riots in the 1960s and promise to never vote for Democrats again then maybe, just maybe, we can discuss reparations.
Hey I am a Democrat! Nevertheless, the Democrat Party I really like is the one that existed from 1933 to 1963. The civil rights legislation and the War on Poverty were well intended mistakes. I agree with Republican stands on crime, race, and immigration.

Democrats did not need the black vote. When most Negroes were denied the right to vote, in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment, the Democrat Party dominated the United States.

The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment's were controversial at the time. Many whites who had voted for Abraham Lincoln and who supported the Union cause during the Civil War wanted Negroes to be deported or subjected to second class citizenship.
 
Last edited:
just one question: who gets them? how black must you be to be paid? Do the following people get them: Obama, Oprah, Clarence Thomas, Beyonce, Janet Jackson, A rod?
  • Race-based slavery began in the mid-1600s. By the 1660s, slavery was reserved for Africans only. With a series of laws passed from the 1660s to the 1680s, slavery became codified. With these laws, blacks became slaves for life.
We were a commodity.

I'm thinking a good way to do reparations is to do a
level one, level two, and level three for payments.

Level one those who were born from the 1600s-1975 would get 100% of the largest share of the larger amount of reparations as they suffered the most

Level two those born from 1976-1999 they get a smaller portion of reparations.

Level three those born from 2000-2010 get a fairly balanced amount and 2010 is the cut off birth year for reparations.

To answer your question yes, the super rich multi-millionaires and billionaires who qualify get reparations as well, they are most likely going to donate it to a favorite charity or two.
 
Last edited:
for reparations we would go back to the last 5 census that each person has filled out as well as their birth certificates to verify whose black and whose not.
 
If, as many anti racists claim, "Race is only a social construct," how can we tell who is entitled to reparations, and who is not?
 
If, as many anti racists claim, "Race is only a social construct," how can we tell who is entitled to reparations, and who is not?
Up to the last 5 census they have filled out and sent in, and their birth certificates, SS, school records, etc...
 
How does God see it?

Well, when the Children of Israel in the Holy Bible were forced to do free slave labor for many years at the hand of Pharaoh, when God was about to set them free God had the Egyptians give them gold, silver, clothing, food, etc.. on their way out of slavery for all those free years they were not paid.

Not only that, but even the children of the children of Israel were covered in gold and silver jewels. I'm guessing they reaped what the dead ancestors did not get.
I think you are applying modern sensibilities to the Bible. The Bible has no problem with slavery, in fact it spells out the rules for slavery pretty explicitly, including how to sell your own family members into it.

Also, the Hebrews were not slaves in Egypt. (They actually were NEVER in Egypt at all.) According to the Bible, Pharoah just refused to let them worship their own god or let them leave.
 
If the Negroes pay us back for decades of welfare, decades of stealing stuff, the cost of their 2020 BLM Insurrection, all the race riots in the 1960s and promise to never vote for Democrats again then maybe, just maybe, we can discuss reparations.
If the whites pay us back for 500 years of living on our land that they stole then maybe we might listen to anything you have to say.
 
Hey I am a Democrat! Nevertheless, the Democrat Party I really like is the one that existed from 1933 to 1963. The civil rights legislation and the War on Poverty were well intended mistakes. I agree with Republican stands on crime, race, and immigration.

Of course you do. The rich count on your racism to get Republicans elected.

The War on Poverty worked just fine. The black poverty rate dropped from 55% in 1959 to 17% today.

Democrats did not need the black vote. When most Negroes were denied the right to vote, in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment, the Democrat Party dominated the United States.

Actually, that's not true, either. From 1860 to 1932, Democrats only held the White House for 16 years. Grover Cleveland's two non-consecutive terms (where he barely scraped by in the Popular vote) and Woodrow Wilson's (because the GOP has split into progressive and conservative wings). What supercharged the Democratic vote between 1932 and 1963 was that they openly appealed to black voters, because Republicans hadn't done much for them since emancipation.

The worst thing you can say about FDR, HST and JFK is that they spent too much time placating the inbreds in the south instead of moving forward more quickly.

The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment's were controversial at the time. Many whites who had voted for Abraham Lincoln and who supported the Union cause during the Civil War wanted Negroes to be deported or subjected to second class citizenship.

Yes, good thing no one listened to those assholes.
 
Of course you do. The rich count on your racism to get Republicans elected.

The War on Poverty worked just fine. The black poverty rate dropped from 55% in 1959 to 17% today.
Black poverty was not reduced in ways that would have been politically sustainable. It was achieved by more and bigger welfare checks and affirmative action programs that forced bosses to hire unqualified Negroes.
 
Actually, that's not true, either. From 1860 to 1932, Democrats only held the White House for 16 years. Grover Cleveland's two non-consecutive terms (where he barely scraped by in the Popular vote) and Woodrow Wilson's (because the GOP has split into progressive and conservative wings). What supercharged the Democratic vote between 1932 and 1963 was that they openly appealed to black voters, because Republicans hadn't done much for them since emancipation.

The worst thing you can say about FDR, HST and JFK is that they spent too much time placating the inbreds in the south instead of moving forward more quickly.
The Democrats dominated the United States from 1933 to 1966, when the black ghetto riots began to cause more whites to vote Republican.
 
IM2, what are your thoughts on Killer Mike and his opinion here? I think he makes entirely sensible arguments, the question still is what would be an appropriate response. Of course many people say "I had nothing to do with slavery, why should I have to pay?" but there are reparations the government can take that don't involve cash payments, but ways to unburden certain communities of color, as well as families everywhere, of some financial burdens with student loans, taxes, etc.. A connection to depressed and poor neighborhoods can be made to the legacy of slavery, on this there should be little argument.

It really is a question most are not even comfortable discussing, much less finding agreement on any possible future action.

 
If the whites pay us back for 500 years of living on our land that they stole then maybe we might listen to anything you have to say.
It ain't your land, Injin. We kicked your ass and took it away from you because you didn't have a stringent immigration policy.
 
Black poverty was not reduced in ways that would have been politically sustainable. It was achieved by more and bigger welfare checks and affirmative action programs that forced bosses to hire unqualified Negroes.
More welfare went to white people than blacks.
More white women benefited from AA than black people.

The Democrats dominated the United States from 1933 to 1966, when the black ghetto riots began to cause more whites to vote Republican.
AFTER THEY LET BLACKS JOIN THEIR COALITION. Before that, the Democrats were largely a regional party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top