Antiderivative
Rookie
- Apr 17, 2011
- 1,616
- 103
- 0
- Banned
- #21
Still don't see it. Sorry.
I know you don't. There is a persistent delusion among tea baggers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still don't see it. Sorry.
I remember when teabaggers hijacked a valid libertarian movement in order to superficially rebrand the GOP.
They are charlatans.
no political belief is more "valid" than another
Taxation is the Constitutionally mandated way the government keeps itself liquid..
Don't like it?
Move.
Ace.
And where does it contain the CHARITY aspect of it?
Don't look for it. It doesn't EXIST. And don't even try 'General Welfare Clause'...because it doesn't mean what YOU and the welfare takers think it does.
Got it ACE?
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
Taxation is the Constitutionally mandated way the government keeps itself liquid..
Don't like it?
Move.
Ace.
And where does it contain the CHARITY aspect of it?
Don't look for it. It doesn't EXIST. And don't even try 'General Welfare Clause'...because it doesn't mean what YOU and the welfare takers think it does.
Got it ACE?
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
Good. Since you seem to mean it?
WE the people are dog-tired of having charity corerced from us via TAXATION for Government control...
Get it ACE?
Good. Since you seem to mean it?
WE the people are dog-tired of having charity corerced from us via TAXATION for Government control...
Get it ACE?
I do hope your state get hit hard .
ace .
but if you ass's in texas knew a damn thing , y fuck I'm reasoning with a texan ? now that a trick .
don't need you fucking charity here boy .
but your still bitching about new orleans .
texas drought continue I hope .
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
And where does it contain the CHARITY aspect of it?
Don't look for it. It doesn't EXIST. And don't even try 'General Welfare Clause'...because it doesn't mean what YOU and the welfare takers think it does.
Got it ACE?
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
I had no idea WalMart greeter paid so much.
Or are you pretending to be a CEO this week?
Whatever. I know when people start boasting like high schoolers then the empty drum sounds loudest.
The general welfare clause cannot be stretched to cover every eventuality. That would defeat the purpose of limited government, which was the object of the Framers.
That is probably way above your level of understanding however.
The federal government certainly expanded its social welfare legislation considerably in the twentieth century, but the roots of current federal social welfare reach back into the earliest years of the nation.
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
I had no idea WalMart greeter paid so much.
Or are you pretending to be a CEO this week?
Whatever. I know when people start boasting like high schoolers then the empty drum sounds loudest.
The general welfare clause cannot be stretched to cover every eventuality. That would defeat the purpose of limited government, which was the object of the Framers.
That is probably way above your level of understanding however.
Uh-huh.
The federal government certainly expanded its social welfare legislation considerably in the twentieth century, but the roots of current federal social welfare reach back into the earliest years of the nation.
https://litigation-essentials.lexis...cid=3B15&key=aa72da5400c8e9d611836adcc06ffca0
.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
Actually, the GWC didn't mean this in the original context. In the original context it meant that the government provided a legal system that protects your labor. Protecting peoples labor from theft is utmost importance to society and is considered "the general welfare".
.
I remember when teabaggers hijacked a valid libertarian movement in order to superficially rebrand the GOP.
They are charlatans.
no political belief is more "valid" than another
WTF are you talking about?
First, I never presented this argument.
Second, I strongly disagree with you.
Perhaps you want to try this again.
on Obama's comment on we are all responsible for each other , then theses last storms that came through Mo. , I can see your whining now about Obama might give us government aid ,
I look for no help from you selfish bastards . just complaints
When people say "teabaggers" they mean average Americans.
I remember when teabaggers hijacked a valid libertarian movement in order to superficially rebrand the GOP.
They are charlatans.
And there it is.................
And there's WHAT?
*NOTHING*
And in typical fashion, on Page ONE of the thread even, the left is again incapable of focusing on and discussing the issue but we're already to BLAME BUSH. (Of course the Tea Party didn't exist under President Bush but that doesn't bother them.)
Do you suppose we'll get to corporate welfare and racism by Page Two?
"If theres anything that Warren Buffett has prized more than his billions, its his companys reputation. Which is why there was a collective gasp of betrayal when Buffetts onetime heir apparent, David Sokol, resigned in the aftermath of pocketing $3 million from trading in the stock of a chemical company Berkshire was acquiring. Buffett furiously spun the departure, insisting nothing unlawful transpired. In a Reuters survey of 23 top bankers, 21 said Sokols trades looked ethically wrong to them, yet only one in five expected any insider-trading charges to be brought. The incident has raised the question, yet again, about what it takes to succeed in finance. Do bankers think of the law as something to be scoffed at and ethics are only for suckers? Increasingly, even veteran investors say the answer is an outraged yes.
What youre seeing on Wall Street is disgusting, says Vanguard Group founder John Bogle. Not so many years ago there were some things one simply didnt do. Period. And thats evolved into moral relativism, into When everybody else is doing it, I can do it too. Ive only been in this business 60 years, adds Bogle, and it is absolutely worse now than before. He believes that we have a societal problem, not just a Wall Street problem.
Will anything chasten Wall Street? Oliver Budde, a former Lehman Brothers lawyer, says many bankers really feel awful about what they do, but theres this other dynamic of Look, if we dont do it, then someone else will do it.? As he puts it: Morals, ethicsthats not their job. The view on the Street is that thats Congresss job. Washington, are you listening?"
Good. Since you seem to mean it?
WE the people are dog-tired of having charity corerced from us via TAXATION for Government control...
Get it ACE?
Taxation is the Constitutionally mandated way the government keeps itself liquid..
Good. Since you seem to mean it?
WE the people are dog-tired of having charity corerced from us via TAXATION for Government control...
Get it ACE?
Taxation is the Constitutionally mandated way the government keeps itself liquid..
Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Amendment 16 - Status of Income Tax Clarified. Ratified 2/3/1913. Note History
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Don't like it?
Move.
Ace.
And where does it contain the CHARITY aspect of it?
Don't look for it. It doesn't EXIST. And don't even try 'General Welfare Clause'...because it doesn't mean what YOU and the welfare takers think it does.
Got it ACE?
And where does it contain the CHARITY aspect of it?
Don't look for it. It doesn't EXIST. And don't even try 'General Welfare Clause'...because it doesn't mean what YOU and the welfare takers think it does.
Got it ACE?
Drunkie..I lose more pocket change then you make in an entire year.
And yeah..the General Welfare clause basically covers it. If the government doesn't do anything to take care of the people...then there is no reason for government.
Got it..Ace?
Do you really believe that the intended function of the federal government is to take care of the people? Do you honestly believe that those that endured the long winter and other extreme hardships in a bloody revolution did that so that some monarch or dictator or totalitarian government would take care of them?
Or did they do that so that they would at last be free with the hard won liberty to take care of themselves rather than be under a government that would decide what they could and could not have?