LibertyKid
Platinum Member
- May 26, 2021
- 1,965
- 1,203
- 938
Seriously, were talking about Michael Brown? Michael Brown was physically assualting the officer and attempting to reach for his side arm.
No matter the color of your skin, you will get shot by the officer themself or by an assisting officer. Play dumb games, win dumb prizes.
Brown was shot by the officer attempting to grab his gun.
After being shot, Brown went out from the officer's patrol car, then turned around, and charged at the officer again. Michael Brown was considerably a much larger man than the officer, and after having to defend himself from a 300 pound plus man just moments earlier, the officer knew his life was in danger and stopped the threat.
The evidence, whether you like it or not, don't believe it, or think the DA was a crook, yadda yadda, pointed to those facts.
But at the end of the day, Michael Brown was in complete control of his decisions. What is terrible is that the young man didn't have to die that day. But the media, BLM, politicians want to ignore all the other facts around that young man, that led him to the lifestyle he was living and the nurturing events in his life that brought him to that moment.
Unfortunately Michael Brown chose poorly that day.
In all these cases, if compliance with officers would occur, these deaths don't happen.
Why do we ignore the personal choices that brought the criminal to that point where they had to interact with police? Then, the criminals, do everything but comply who escalate the situation themselves. But for some of you, you conveniently ignore those facts.
No matter the color of your skin, you will get shot by the officer themself or by an assisting officer. Play dumb games, win dumb prizes.
Brown was shot by the officer attempting to grab his gun.
After being shot, Brown went out from the officer's patrol car, then turned around, and charged at the officer again. Michael Brown was considerably a much larger man than the officer, and after having to defend himself from a 300 pound plus man just moments earlier, the officer knew his life was in danger and stopped the threat.
The evidence, whether you like it or not, don't believe it, or think the DA was a crook, yadda yadda, pointed to those facts.
But at the end of the day, Michael Brown was in complete control of his decisions. What is terrible is that the young man didn't have to die that day. But the media, BLM, politicians want to ignore all the other facts around that young man, that led him to the lifestyle he was living and the nurturing events in his life that brought him to that moment.
Unfortunately Michael Brown chose poorly that day.
In all these cases, if compliance with officers would occur, these deaths don't happen.
Why do we ignore the personal choices that brought the criminal to that point where they had to interact with police? Then, the criminals, do everything but comply who escalate the situation themselves. But for some of you, you conveniently ignore those facts.