Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,101
- 245
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzGTaEQebfE]ABC 27 covers the story of the zombie Mohammed court case - YouTube[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's pretty funny, they are both dumbasses.
Held accountable for how he FELT about Muslims?
I mean seriously...
That's pretty funny, they are both dumbasses.
Who? The religious nut and the judge? I agree. I don't see anything funny other than the clown suits that they were wearing.
That's pretty funny, they are both dumbasses.
Who? The religious nut and the judge? I agree. I don't see anything funny other than the clown suits that they were wearing.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
That's pretty funny, they are both dumbasses.
Who? The religious nut and the judge? I agree. I don't see anything funny other than the clown suits that they were wearing.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
That's pretty funny, they are both dumbasses.
Who? The religious nut and the judge? I agree. I don't see anything funny other than the clown suits that they were wearing.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Who? The religious nut and the judge? I agree. I don't see anything funny other than the clown suits that they were wearing.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
Held accountable for how he FELT about Muslims?
I mean seriously...
Do you think Judge Mark Martin has read the US Constitution?
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
I love the right of protest better than most around here but everyone knows by now how touchy Muslims can be about blasphemy, while he has the certain right to protest in any way he wants, what he did was pretty much incitement. Also the people who are trying make atheism a quasi-religious thing and be evangelists about it are just generally dumbasses.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
Responsible protest?? In America we have the right to protest any way we want to, without violence. Violence was visited on the protester in violation of his rights. The nutjob Islamist should be in jail for assault, and the judge should be chasing stray cats.
Not at all. Sensitivity has nothing to with this. This is freedom of speech and this allows bashing any religion. If the attacker can't live by our constitution then he should move back to where sharia is loved. It really is as simple as that.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity and everything to do with responsible protest, the responsibility to not incite violence. The judge could have charged both or neither and made the right choice to just toss it.
Responsible protest?? In America we have the right to protest any way we want to, without violence. Violence was visited on the protester in violation of his rights. The nutjob Islamist should be in jail for assault, and the judge should be chasing stray cats.