GMCGeneral
Diamond Member
So, you favor eliminating all opposition to your Communist agenda, traitorous scum?Face it T-Rump is fucked. Plain and simple. Deal with ti!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, you favor eliminating all opposition to your Communist agenda, traitorous scum?Face it T-Rump is fucked. Plain and simple. Deal with ti!
From what I understand....those people that plead guilty were moles. They got kicked of the Trump team shortly after they started making ridiculous claims they couldn't prove.
Doesn't it seem a little weird that none of them will serve a day in prison, you pathetic asshole???
But, But, But Hillary.
Hunter Biden is a fairly recent target. You finally give up on finding any credible evidence against any of your older targets?
Do you think Hunter and Joe didn't profit from the vice presidential position?Hunter Biden is a fairly recent target. You finally give up on finding any credible evidence against any of your older targets?
Do you think you will ever come up with credible proof that they did?Do you think Hunter and Joe didn't profit from the vice presidential position?
What puts the lie to everything you believe in is the fact that the very people who repeat "Nobody is above the law" seem to be Above The Law despite all of the crap they've pulled the last several years.No true Scotsman - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Answer my question firstDo you think you will ever come up with credible proof that they did?
Conspiracy theories, and your imagination don't really count as much as you wish they did. Quit making shit up.What puts the lie to everything you believe in is the fact that the very people who repeat "Nobody is above the law" seem to be Above The Law despite all of the crap they've pulled the last several years.
That includes OBama murdering his chef....Biden selling us out to the Chinese and Iran....and Hillary getting away with pushing Russian Collusion down our throats.
No doubt they did, but no more than any other prominant citizen's children benefit from being the child of a prominant citizen. Do you think Ivanka would have gotten all those trademarks if not for her daddy? Billy Carter, who knew nothing about brewing was able to sell Billy Beer. Do you think legacy admissions at major colleges are illegal?Answer my question first
Okay yeah, Biden is President so he'll probably get away with this and so on with his son. Sounds like you are guilty of a false equivalent though, just because these other people did these things makes it okay for Biden's traitorous activities. You are a selloutNo doubt they did, but no more than any other prominant citizen's children benefit from being the child of a prominant citizen. Do you think Ivanka would have gotten all those trademarks if not for her daddy? Billy Carter, who knew nothing about brewing was able to sell Billy Beer. Do you think legacy admissions at major colleges are illegal?
Don't be so silly. If you want to discuss profiting from family connections, you might want to look at Ivanka's trademarks, or Jared's 2 billion dollar deal with the Saudi'sOkay yeah, Biden is President so he'll probably get away with this and so on with his son. Sounds like you are guilty of a false equivalent though, just because these other people did these things makes it okay for Biden's traitorous activities. You are a sellout
Don't be so silly. If you want to discuss profiting from family connections, you might want to look at Ivanka's trademarks, or Jared's 2 billion dollar deal with the Saudi's
Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts (Published 2022)
Before committing $2 billion to Mr. Kushner’s fledgling firm, officials at a fund led by the Saudi crown prince questioned taking such a big risk.www.nytimes.com
Sorry, bitch, but I'm not making anything up. You simply refuse to admit the truth because you think that Obama, Biden, and Hillary are above the law.Conspiracy theories, and your imagination don't really count as much as you wish they did. Quit making shit up.
Conspiracy theories, and your imagination don't really count as much as you wish they did. Quit making shit up.
/----/ And he's not BELOW the law either. We're still waiting for the pro Palestinian protestors who invaded Congress to be arrested. Are they above the law?I've been trying to compile a list of links that I believe, lay out the realities facing the people on the inside. People on the inside who have been, and are continuing to be investigated for, indicted on, and charged with alleged crimes related to the 2020 election, and the events of Jan 6. There are people who were in the Trump administration, people who were advising the administration, and still others who seem to have coordinated with people on the inside (as well as with elected officials in the legislative branch of government), who are now facing some serious consequences for their own actions.
(note: will the Judicial branch get dragged in because of family and outside connections to various Justices?)
Two of the former President's Lawyers guilty of illegally conspiring to overturn Trump’s 2020 election loss in Georgia
One was sentenced to six years of probation for six counts of conspiracy to commit intentional interference with performance of election duties.
Let me start with a group outside of the administration:
Trump's duly elected and qualified electors falsely stating they were the state’s - (Note: the 'duly elected' and 'qualified electors' use of phrases. The phrasing seems to mimic talking points from political caucuses and media allies. As if to imply in a subtle yet effective way that the elections of some elected officials are bogus.)
Michigan Republican charged in false elector plot agrees to cooperation deal
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A Michigan Republican accused of participating in a fake elector plot had all criminal charges dropped Thursday after he and the state Attorney General's office reached a cooperation deal.
James Renner was one of 16 Republicans who acted as false electors for then-President Donald Trump in 2020, according to charges announced in July by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. President Joe Biden won Michigan by nearly 155,000 votes, a result confirmed by a GOP-led state Senate investigation in 2021.
All 16 defendants pleaded not guilty to eight criminal charges, including multiple counts of forgery, after investigators say the group met following the 2020 presidential election and signed a document falsely stating they were the state’s “duly elected and qualified electors.”
But on Thursday, the attorney general's office announced during a court hearing in Ingham County that it would drop its case against Renner, 77, based on “an agreement between the parties.”
then...
Mark Meadows’s Testimony in Georgia Case May Have Done Him No Favors
Mark Meadows, a former top Trump aide, took the witness stand in hopes of having his election interference case moved to federal court. So far, the strategy has not paid off.
At issue was whether his actions — as described in the indictment of Mr. Trump, Mr. Meadows and 17 others in Fulton County, Ga., last month — could be considered within the scope of his duties as White House chief of staff. Mr. Meadows made the case for that under questioning by his lawyer, but he hit a snag when a prosecutor asked whether he had “any role” in coordinating the bogus electors who were used in a last-ditch effort to keep Mr. Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election.
“No, I did not,” he replied.
The prosecutor then introduced into the record a December 2020 email that Mr. Meadows wrote to a Trump campaign staff member. In it, Mr. Meadows wrote, “We just need to have someone coordinating the electors for the states.”
Mark Meadows’s Testimony in Georgia Case May Have Done Him No Favors
Mark Meadows, a former top Trump aide, took the witness stand in hopes of having his election interference case moved to federal court. So far, the strategy has not paid off.www.nytimes.com
Trump won’t try to move Georgia case to federal court after judge rejected similar bid by Meadows
Trump won't try to move Georgia case to federal court after judge rejected similar bid by Meadows
The revelation in a court filing Thursday comes three weeks after a judge rejected a similar attempt by Trump's White House chief of staff.www.pbs.org
“The evidence before the Court overwhelmingly suggests that Meadows was not acting in his scope of executive branch duties during most of the Overt Acts alleged,” wrote Jones.
Judge rejects Mark Meadows’ bid to move Georgia election interference case to federal court
CNN —
A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ bid to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for former President Donald Trump.
US District Judge Steve Jones found that the allegations against Meadows contained in the Fulton County district attorney’s indictment on election subversion charges were largely “related to political activities” and not to Meadows’ role as White House chief of staff.
“The evidence before the Court overwhelmingly suggests that Meadows was not acting in his scope of executive branch duties during most of the Overt Acts alleged,” wrote Jones, a Barack Obama appointee.
Mark Meadows drops bid for emergency stay in Georgia RICO case
The people in question faced time in prison, ergo the time waved for a plea.From what I understand....those people that plead guilty were moles. They got kicked of the Trump team shortly after they started making ridiculous claims they couldn't prove.
Doesn't it seem a little weird that none of them will serve a day in prison, you pathetic asshole???
/----/ And he's not BELOW the law either. We're still waiting for the pro Palestinian protestors who invaded Congress to be arrested. Are they above the law?
I've been trying to compile a list of links that I believe, lay out the realities facing the people on the inside. People on the inside who have been, and are continuing to be investigated for, indicted on, and charged with alleged crimes related to the 2020 election, and the events of Jan 6. There are people who were in the Trump administration, people who were advising the administration, and still others who seem to have coordinated with people on the inside (as well as with elected officials in the legislative branch of government), who are now facing some serious consequences for their own actions.
(note: will the Judicial branch get dragged in because of family and outside connections to various Justices?)
Two of the former President's Lawyers guilty of illegally conspiring to overturn Trump’s 2020 election loss in Georgia
One was sentenced to six years of probation for six counts of conspiracy to commit intentional interference with performance of election duties.
Let me start with a group outside of the administration:
Trump's duly elected and qualified electors falsely stating they were the state’s - (Note: the 'duly elected' and 'qualified electors' use of phrases. The phrasing seems to mimic talking points from political caucuses and media allies. As if to imply in a subtle yet effective way that the elections of some elected officials are bogus.)
Michigan Republican charged in false elector plot agrees to cooperation deal
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A Michigan Republican accused of participating in a fake elector plot had all criminal charges dropped Thursday after he and the state Attorney General's office reached a cooperation deal.
James Renner was one of 16 Republicans who acted as false electors for then-President Donald Trump in 2020, according to charges announced in July by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. President Joe Biden won Michigan by nearly 155,000 votes, a result confirmed by a GOP-led state Senate investigation in 2021.
All 16 defendants pleaded not guilty to eight criminal charges, including multiple counts of forgery, after investigators say the group met following the 2020 presidential election and signed a document falsely stating they were the state’s “duly elected and qualified electors.”
But on Thursday, the attorney general's office announced during a court hearing in Ingham County that it would drop its case against Renner, 77, based on “an agreement between the parties.”
then...
Mark Meadows’s Testimony in Georgia Case May Have Done Him No Favors
Mark Meadows, a former top Trump aide, took the witness stand in hopes of having his election interference case moved to federal court. So far, the strategy has not paid off.
At issue was whether his actions — as described in the indictment of Mr. Trump, Mr. Meadows and 17 others in Fulton County, Ga., last month — could be considered within the scope of his duties as White House chief of staff. Mr. Meadows made the case for that under questioning by his lawyer, but he hit a snag when a prosecutor asked whether he had “any role” in coordinating the bogus electors who were used in a last-ditch effort to keep Mr. Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election.
“No, I did not,” he replied.
The prosecutor then introduced into the record a December 2020 email that Mr. Meadows wrote to a Trump campaign staff member. In it, Mr. Meadows wrote, “We just need to have someone coordinating the electors for the states.”
Mark Meadows’s Testimony in Georgia Case May Have Done Him No Favors
Mark Meadows, a former top Trump aide, took the witness stand in hopes of having his election interference case moved to federal court. So far, the strategy has not paid off.www.nytimes.com
Trump won’t try to move Georgia case to federal court after judge rejected similar bid by Meadows
Trump won't try to move Georgia case to federal court after judge rejected similar bid by Meadows
The revelation in a court filing Thursday comes three weeks after a judge rejected a similar attempt by Trump's White House chief of staff.www.pbs.org
“The evidence before the Court overwhelmingly suggests that Meadows was not acting in his scope of executive branch duties during most of the Overt Acts alleged,” wrote Jones.
Judge rejects Mark Meadows’ bid to move Georgia election interference case to federal court
CNN —
A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows’ bid to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court, a significant setback for Meadows and a troubling sign for former President Donald Trump.
US District Judge Steve Jones found that the allegations against Meadows contained in the Fulton County district attorney’s indictment on election subversion charges were largely “related to political activities” and not to Meadows’ role as White House chief of staff.
“The evidence before the Court overwhelmingly suggests that Meadows was not acting in his scope of executive branch duties during most of the Overt Acts alleged,” wrote Jones, a Barack Obama appointee.
Mark Meadows drops bid for emergency stay in Georgia RICO case