In response to copied post in attached image:
1. I believe under the current system, the problem was the Conservative voters, mostly Republican Libertarian and Independents, believe in Notarized absentee ballots and do not consider the mailin ballots valid without legal proof they were not faulty or were not illegal or ineligible people abusing balloting that was changed under rules not voted on by elected state reps.
2. I believe under future reforms we will move toward more direct democracy and Proportional Representation by Party to separate choice of social policies and taxes. So that will reduce demand on voter fraud when people and parties have to fund what they vote for and not force this on dissenting voters.
3. For this Pandemic Election, both 1 and 2 caused fraud by misrepresenting the Election as valid despite the unlawful problems above that violate the equal beliefs, protections and representation of over half the public who reserves the right to reject the election and demand corrections that represent consent of taxpayers affected. We are not required to accept a faith based election unless we agree to it. And half the voters do not.
So by the First Amendment we can unite in arguing against the abuse of govt elections to establish a faith based policy not proven by notarized ballots, which discriminates by creed against people of Libertarian beliefs in individual liberty and in limited govt based on consent, and denies public accommodations to half the voting population excluded from representation whose beliefs are violated by Statist mandates.
1. I believe under the current system, the problem was the Conservative voters, mostly Republican Libertarian and Independents, believe in Notarized absentee ballots and do not consider the mailin ballots valid without legal proof they were not faulty or were not illegal or ineligible people abusing balloting that was changed under rules not voted on by elected state reps.
2. I believe under future reforms we will move toward more direct democracy and Proportional Representation by Party to separate choice of social policies and taxes. So that will reduce demand on voter fraud when people and parties have to fund what they vote for and not force this on dissenting voters.
3. For this Pandemic Election, both 1 and 2 caused fraud by misrepresenting the Election as valid despite the unlawful problems above that violate the equal beliefs, protections and representation of over half the public who reserves the right to reject the election and demand corrections that represent consent of taxpayers affected. We are not required to accept a faith based election unless we agree to it. And half the voters do not.
So by the First Amendment we can unite in arguing against the abuse of govt elections to establish a faith based policy not proven by notarized ballots, which discriminates by creed against people of Libertarian beliefs in individual liberty and in limited govt based on consent, and denies public accommodations to half the voting population excluded from representation whose beliefs are violated by Statist mandates.
