Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So few lines, so many fallacies, so typical.Another big lie. Republicans are always fiscally conservative, and Democrats tax and spend.
FACT: When the Congress was under the control of the GOP, and GWB was president, the foundation was set leading to the greatest economic crisis since the great depression.
If the R's has established reasonable regulations and oversight, the crash of 2008 might not have happened, or even if a correcton occured, it most likely would not have been so devistating.
Blaiming President Clinton and President Obama is wonderful fantasy, and many of the RW Fringe actually believe such delusions.
Acorn meet tree.
"Originally, when I began reporting on the Neo-Nazis and conspiracy theory driven right wing extremists and their associations with Ron Paul, I assumed they were a fringe group who jumped on to the Ron Paul bandwagon. Then after doing extensive research, I realized that not only did the Neo-Nazis and the John Birch/Timothy McVeigh based conspiracy theorists support Ron Paul, but Ron Paul supports the views of the Neo-Nazis and the conspiracy theorists.
There are several pieces of evidence tying Paul to both white supremacists and right wing conspiracy theorists. One connection that ties Paul to both Neo-Nazis and conspiracy theorists, is his close connection to the John Birch society. The John Birch Society is a group that has been called, paranoid, radical, racist, and extremist, and believes in a Jewish/Freemason conspiracy to transform the world into a communist New World Order." Ron Paul Is A White Supremacist - Jack & Jill Politics
PS William Jefferson Clinton raised TAXES, and we had the best economy since Reagan started the destruction of the working class and the middle class.
Okay TWO PIECES OF STUPIDTY.
A) It's obvious I schooled liberals on trying to attack Rand Paul via, HOW DARE HE INSULT BILL CLINTON FOR BEING A SERIAL LIAR AND ADULTERER. JUST BECAUSE WE KNOW IT'S TRUE AND WE WOULDN'T LET A REPUBLICAN OFF THE HOOK LIKE THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T DEMAND IT OF PAUL!!!!!
So, given that completely failed, all they have left is attack the father? Really? That's all you got! ATOMIC FAIL LIBERALS.
If it's "below the belt" to bring up Bill Clinton's past, it's NOT "below the belt to bring up Rand Paul's FATHER'S PAST?????????
ROFL WHAT A PACK OF HYPOCRITES!!!!
Thank you for proving me right once again, what a pack of utter hypocrites you are.
B) William Jefferson had the best economy?
You want to check unemployment figures for Bubba again?
Because that great economy you talk about, didn't happen until Republicans took Congress in 1994, and FORCED Clinton to cut capital gains and reform Welfare (and that's just two things they forced Clinton to do). How did they force him? Clinton didn't want to be embarrassed by an overrride vote, so he sign them, after he had vetoed them before.
Go ahead and look when unemployment numbers start to fall. It's AFTER 1994. Oh and that means your raise taxes meme doesn't count for much, because cutting capital gains, was a TAX CUT. Oops!
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.
I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.
poor insane tea loon
Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.
AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boo fweaking hoo!
So few lines, so many fallacies, so typical.Another big lie. Republicans are always fiscally conservative, and Democrats tax and spend.
FACT: When the Congress was under the control of the GOP, and GWB was president, the foundation was set leading to the greatest economic crisis since the great depression.
If the R's has established reasonable regulations and oversight, the crash of 2008 might not have happened, or even if a correcton occured, it most likely would not have been so devistating.
Blaiming President Clinton and President Obama is wonderful fantasy, and many of the RW Fringe actually believe such delusions.
New reputation!
Hi, you have received -39 reputation points from blu.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
idiot
Regards,
blu
Okay TWO PIECES OF STUPIDTY.
A) It's obvious I schooled liberals on trying to attack Rand Paul via, HOW DARE HE INSULT BILL CLINTON FOR BEING A SERIAL LIAR AND ADULTERER. JUST BECAUSE WE KNOW IT'S TRUE AND WE WOULDN'T LET A REPUBLICAN OFF THE HOOK LIKE THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T DEMAND IT OF PAUL!!!!!
So, given that completely failed, all they have left is attack the father? Really? That's all you got! ATOMIC FAIL LIBERALS.
If it's "below the belt" to bring up Bill Clinton's past, it's NOT "below the belt to bring up Rand Paul's FATHER'S PAST?????????
ROFL WHAT A PACK OF HYPOCRITES!!!!
Thank you for proving me right once again, what a pack of utter hypocrites you are.
B) William Jefferson had the best economy?
You want to check unemployment figures for Bubba again?
Because that great economy you talk about, didn't happen until Republicans took Congress in 1994, and FORCED Clinton to cut capital gains and reform Welfare (and that's just two things they forced Clinton to do). How did they force him? Clinton didn't want to be embarrassed by an overrride vote, so he sign them, after he had vetoed them before.
Go ahead and look when unemployment numbers start to fall. It's AFTER 1994. Oh and that means your raise taxes meme doesn't count for much, because cutting capital gains, was a TAX CUT. Oops!
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.
I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.
It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.
For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.
poor insane tea loon
Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.
AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boo fweaking hoo!
Melting down again, I see.
Someone who types 'bowl movement' and makes so many fallacies in so few lines - ie. a high fallacy index - has little room to criticize much of anything, with any cred, that is.Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.
I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.
It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.
For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.
Don't you get it TPS (of course not, being stupid implies 'notgettingit'). Your posts are nothing more than a bowl movement of RW bull shit. Have you no independent ideas (of course not, being stupid).
Rand Paul Lobs Lewinsky Attack At Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton talks about the economy and this shithead brings up Lewinsky. Despite Clinton's marriage indiscretions, he left the White House with a budget surplus and not with a trillion dollar deficit, but since the shithead wants to use ad hominems, why should any voter trust a politician who accepts and refuses to return donations from white supremacists?
You schooled libs? I wasn't aware that "to school" meant to "flood with smilies".Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.
AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boo fweaking hoo!
Melting down again, I see.
I think we see who melted down in this thread. None of you libs have been able to get back on the "how dare Rand Paul criticize our sacred Bill" express, since I schooled libs in this thread on their hypocrisy.
Good thread by Flaylo and yes, what Rand Paul said was typical of idiots who have nothing to say when pressed to focus on the issues at hand. If I needed a qualified plumber to fix my toilet and he's a habitual cheater on his wife should I disqualify him in favor of someone who can't fix a toilet?
The first major Clinton scandal involved the White House travel office and came to be popularly known as "Travelgate." In May 1993, seven long-time employees in the office were abruptly fired and replaced with friends of the Clintons from Arkansas. The FBI then investigated the fired employees, leading to allegations the investigation was being conducted under pressure from the White House solely to justify the firings.
Next, in July, a personal tragedy for the Clintons occurred as Vince Foster, Deputy White House Counsel, and life-long friend of the President, was found shot dead in a park just outside Washington from an apparent suicide.
Huge controversy erupted five months later when it was revealed that federal investigators had been denied access to Foster's White House office, but that Clinton aides had entered the office within hours of Foster's death. Speculation arose in the media that documents related to the Whitewater Development Corporation might have been removed. A month before his death, Foster had filed three years of delinquent Whitewater corporate tax returns.
The Whitewater controversy would eventually spark a federal investigation of President Clinton and the First Lady, that through a strange and remarkable series of political maneuverings and personal failings, would ultimately lead to the first-ever impeachment of an elected President.
Rand Paul Lobs Lewinsky Attack At Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton talks about the economy and this shithead brings up Lewinsky. Despite Clinton's marriage indiscretions, he left the White House with a budget surplus and not with a trillion dollar deficit, but since the shithead wants to use ad hominems, why should any voter trust a politician who accepts and refuses to return donations from white supremacists?
Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.
I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.
It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.
For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.
Don't you get it TPS (of course not, being stupid implies 'notgettingit'). Your posts are nothing more than a bowl movement of RW bull shit. Have you no independent ideas (of course not, being stupid).
You schooled libs? I wasn't aware that "to school" meant to "flood with smilies".Melting down again, I see.
I think we see who melted down in this thread. None of you libs have been able to get back on the "how dare Rand Paul criticize our sacred Bill" express, since I schooled libs in this thread on their hypocrisy.
Good thread by Flaylo and yes, what Rand Paul said was typical of idiots who have nothing to say when pressed to focus on the issues at hand. If I needed a qualified plumber to fix my toilet and he's a habitual cheater on his wife should I disqualify him in favor of someone who can't fix a toilet?