Rand Paul's below the belt ad hominem against Bill

[uscitizen]

Rand loves Medicare, he just hates those who Receive it.
He thinks Medicare should pay DR's more.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Another big lie. Republicans are always fiscally conservative, and Democrats tax and spend.

FACT: When the Congress was under the control of the GOP, and GWB was president, the foundation was set leading to the greatest economic crisis since the great depression.
If the R's has established reasonable regulations and oversight, the crash of 2008 might not have happened, or even if a correcton occured, it most likely would not have been so devistating.
Blaiming President Clinton and President Obama is wonderful fantasy, and many of the RW Fringe actually believe such delusions.

 

[Si modo]

Another big lie. Republicans are always fiscally conservative, and Democrats tax and spend.

FACT: When the Congress was under the control of the GOP, and GWB was president, the foundation was set leading to the greatest economic crisis since the great depression.
If the R's has established reasonable regulations and oversight, the crash of 2008 might not have happened, or even if a correcton occured, it most likely would not have been so devistating.
Blaiming President Clinton and President Obama is wonderful fantasy, and many of the RW Fringe actually believe such delusions.

So few lines, so many fallacies, so typical.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The silly argument that it was the Republican Congress that balanced the budget in the nineties quickly disintegrates when you simply note that that same Congress was in power from 2001 through 2006.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Acorn meet tree.

"Originally, when I began reporting on the Neo-Nazis and conspiracy theory driven right wing extremists and their associations with Ron Paul, I assumed they were a fringe group who jumped on to the Ron Paul bandwagon. Then after doing extensive research, I realized that not only did the Neo-Nazis and the John Birch/Timothy McVeigh based conspiracy theorists support Ron Paul, but Ron Paul supports the views of the Neo-Nazis and the conspiracy theorists.

There are several pieces of evidence tying Paul to both white supremacists and right wing conspiracy theorists. One connection that ties Paul to both Neo-Nazis and conspiracy theorists, is his close connection to the John Birch society. The John Birch Society is a group that has been called, paranoid, radical, racist, and extremist, and believes in a Jewish/Freemason conspiracy to transform the world into a communist “New World Order.”" Ron Paul Is A White Supremacist - Jack & Jill Politics


PS William Jefferson Clinton raised TAXES, and we had the best economy since Reagan started the destruction of the working class and the middle class.

Okay TWO PIECES OF STUPIDTY.

A) It's obvious I schooled liberals on trying to attack Rand Paul via, HOW DARE HE INSULT BILL CLINTON FOR BEING A SERIAL LIAR AND ADULTERER. JUST BECAUSE WE KNOW IT'S TRUE AND WE WOULDN'T LET A REPUBLICAN OFF THE HOOK LIKE THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T DEMAND IT OF PAUL!!!!!

So, given that completely failed, all they have left is attack the father? Really? That's all you got! ATOMIC FAIL LIBERALS.

If it's "below the belt" to bring up Bill Clinton's past, it's NOT "below the belt to bring up Rand Paul's FATHER'S PAST?????????

ROFL WHAT A PACK OF HYPOCRITES!!!!

Thank you for proving me right once again, what a pack of utter hypocrites you are.

B) William Jefferson had the best economy?

You want to check unemployment figures for Bubba again?

Because that great economy you talk about, didn't happen until Republicans took Congress in 1994, and FORCED Clinton to cut capital gains and reform Welfare (and that's just two things they forced Clinton to do). How did they force him? Clinton didn't want to be embarrassed by an overrride vote, so he sign them, after he had vetoed them before.

Go ahead and look when unemployment numbers start to fall. It's AFTER 1994. Oh and that means your raise taxes meme doesn't count for much, because cutting capital gains, was a TAX CUT. Oops!

The United States Unemployment Rate By Year

Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.

I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.

It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.

For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.

 

[bodecea]

poor insane tea loon

Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.

AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boo fweaking hoo!

Melting down again, I see.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Another big lie. Republicans are always fiscally conservative, and Democrats tax and spend.

FACT: When the Congress was under the control of the GOP, and GWB was president, the foundation was set leading to the greatest economic crisis since the great depression.
If the R's has established reasonable regulations and oversight, the crash of 2008 might not have happened, or even if a correcton occured, it most likely would not have been so devistating.
Blaiming President Clinton and President Obama is wonderful fantasy, and many of the RW Fringe actually believe such delusions.

So few lines, so many fallacies, so typical.

Thanks for sharing (it is always nice to hear from the idiot fringe)

 

[teapartysamurai]

New reputation!
Hi, you have received -39 reputation points from blu.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
idiot

Regards,
blu

Aw! The poor wittle babies. They can't argue the fact I schooled them on their own hypocrisy regarding Paul, so all the can do is neg rep and run away.

Let's give the liberals a pity party. 1, 2, 3, . . . .AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let's give them a bigger one on November 3.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Okay TWO PIECES OF STUPIDTY.

A) It's obvious I schooled liberals on trying to attack Rand Paul via, HOW DARE HE INSULT BILL CLINTON FOR BEING A SERIAL LIAR AND ADULTERER. JUST BECAUSE WE KNOW IT'S TRUE AND WE WOULDN'T LET A REPUBLICAN OFF THE HOOK LIKE THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN'T DEMAND IT OF PAUL!!!!!

So, given that completely failed, all they have left is attack the father? Really? That's all you got! ATOMIC FAIL LIBERALS.

If it's "below the belt" to bring up Bill Clinton's past, it's NOT "below the belt to bring up Rand Paul's FATHER'S PAST?????????

ROFL WHAT A PACK OF HYPOCRITES!!!!

Thank you for proving me right once again, what a pack of utter hypocrites you are.

B) William Jefferson had the best economy?

You want to check unemployment figures for Bubba again?

Because that great economy you talk about, didn't happen until Republicans took Congress in 1994, and FORCED Clinton to cut capital gains and reform Welfare (and that's just two things they forced Clinton to do). How did they force him? Clinton didn't want to be embarrassed by an overrride vote, so he sign them, after he had vetoed them before.

Go ahead and look when unemployment numbers start to fall. It's AFTER 1994. Oh and that means your raise taxes meme doesn't count for much, because cutting capital gains, was a TAX CUT. Oops!

The United States Unemployment Rate By Year

Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.

I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.

It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.

For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.

Don't you get it TPS (of course not, being stupid implies 'notgettingit'). Your posts are nothing more than a bowl movement of RW bull shit. Have you no independent ideas (of course not, being stupid).

 

[teapartysamurai]

poor insane tea loon

Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.

AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boo fweaking hoo!

Melting down again, I see.

I think we see who melted down in this thread. None of you libs have been able to get back on the "how dare Rand Paul criticize our sacred Bill" express, since I schooled libs in this thread on their hypocrisy.

 

[Si modo]

Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.

I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.

It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.

For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.

Don't you get it TPS (of course not, being stupid implies 'notgettingit'). Your posts are nothing more than a bowl movement of RW bull shit. Have you no independent ideas (of course not, being stupid).

Someone who types 'bowl movement' and makes so many fallacies in so few lines - ie. a high fallacy index - has little room to criticize much of anything, with any cred, that is.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Rand Paul Lobs Lewinsky Attack At Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton talks about the economy and this shithead brings up Lewinsky. Despite Clinton's marriage indiscretions, he left the White House with a budget surplus and not with a trillion dollar deficit, but since the shithead wants to use ad hominems, why should any voter trust a politician who accepts and refuses to return donations from white supremacists?

Bill got to ride the dot.com bubble created by Reagans deregulation.
Bill created the houseing bubble that fucked us all
Bill fucked women that were not his wife, many times.
Bill fucked the military using illegal means.

And you get all pissy when that turd wants to talk economics and another person brings light to the fact he's a pathetic worm that doesn't deserve the shit he digs through?

 

[bodecea]

Which is Jillian's way of saying I owned her and she can't do anything back but spew pathetic little insults.

AW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boo fweaking hoo!

Melting down again, I see.

I think we see who melted down in this thread. None of you libs have been able to get back on the "how dare Rand Paul criticize our sacred Bill" express, since I schooled libs in this thread on their hypocrisy.

You schooled libs? I wasn't aware that "to school" meant to "flood with smilies".

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Good thread by Flaylo and yes, what Rand Paul said was typical of idiots who have nothing to say when pressed to focus on the issues at hand. If I needed a qualified plumber to fix my toilet and he's a habitual cheater on his wife should I disqualify him in favor of someone who can't fix a toilet?

 

[Samson]

Good thread by Flaylo and yes, what Rand Paul said was typical of idiots who have nothing to say when pressed to focus on the issues at hand. If I needed a qualified plumber to fix my toilet and he's a habitual cheater on his wife should I disqualify him in favor of someone who can't fix a toilet?

There's plenty more:

Travelgate.....
Vince Foster....
Whitewater....

The first major Clinton scandal involved the White House travel office and came to be popularly known as "Travelgate." In May 1993, seven long-time employees in the office were abruptly fired and replaced with friends of the Clintons from Arkansas. The FBI then investigated the fired employees, leading to allegations the investigation was being conducted under pressure from the White House solely to justify the firings.

Next, in July, a personal tragedy for the Clintons occurred as Vince Foster, Deputy White House Counsel, and life-long friend of the President, was found shot dead in a park just outside Washington from an apparent suicide.

Huge controversy erupted five months later when it was revealed that federal investigators had been denied access to Foster's White House office, but that Clinton aides had entered the office within hours of Foster's death. Speculation arose in the media that documents related to the Whitewater Development Corporation might have been removed. A month before his death, Foster had filed three years of delinquent Whitewater corporate tax returns.

The Whitewater controversy would eventually spark a federal investigation of President Clinton and the First Lady, that through a strange and remarkable series of political maneuverings and personal failings, would ultimately lead to the first-ever impeachment of an elected President.

The History Place - Impeachment: Bill Clinton

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Rand Paul Lobs Lewinsky Attack At Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton talks about the economy and this shithead brings up Lewinsky. Despite Clinton's marriage indiscretions, he left the White House with a budget surplus and not with a trillion dollar deficit, but since the shithead wants to use ad hominems, why should any voter trust a politician who accepts and refuses to return donations from white supremacists?

Right, Bill didn't say anything negative about Rand at all. And we know Jack Conway would never say anything below the belt about Rand, because he's strictly focused on the issues. He has to be, because he takes so many positions on every issue it'd be hard to keep that all straight.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Thing is, TPS, Rand Paul is not criticizing Clinton for being an adulterer. He's criticizing him for his use of his position of power for sexual favors from subordinates.

I agree with that criticism, be it one who does it in government, as a physician, as a professor, as a boss, etc.

It's irrelevant what Paul is criticizing Clinton for, because there are so many things you CAN criticize Clinton for.

For liberals to get in a phony self righteous snit because Paul DARES bring up Clinton's past, like liberals would never do a thing like that is ludicrous.

Don't you get it TPS (of course not, being stupid implies 'notgettingit'). Your posts are nothing more than a bowl movement of RW bull shit. Have you no independent ideas (of course not, being stupid).

Apparently, "independent" in Wry Catcher's world is whatever his liberal/soicialist maters give him to think.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Melting down again, I see.

I think we see who melted down in this thread. None of you libs have been able to get back on the "how dare Rand Paul criticize our sacred Bill" express, since I schooled libs in this thread on their hypocrisy.

You schooled libs? I wasn't aware that "to school" meant to "flood with smilies".

Man, liberals are so full of rage, they just CAN'T STAND the the fact that there are those of us out there with good cheer. After all, Obama's policies were supposed to make us all soooooo miserable, we would be BEGGING Democrats to stay in power and solve all our problems.

But if you think you're man enough, prove me wrong. Show me where I'm wrong on liberal hypocrisy on this issue. I can't WAIT for you to try.

 

[uscitizen]

The more I hear and see of Rand Paul...
Well I am thinking the boy is not all that bright.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Good thread by Flaylo and yes, what Rand Paul said was typical of idiots who have nothing to say when pressed to focus on the issues at hand. If I needed a qualified plumber to fix my toilet and he's a habitual cheater on his wife should I disqualify him in favor of someone who can't fix a toilet?

Or if she dabbled in witchcraft in high school?????????????????

Hypocrites!