toxicmedia
Gold Member
I think ISIS feels more victimized by the half US half Iranian proxy Shiite leaders, that went after the Sunnis.Yes they did their leader's name is Baghdadi for chrissakes. Assad was not propped up by the US, he was anti US. So the idea of ISIS moving from Iraq to overthrow the anti American Assad doesn't fit your narrative that these people are just poor little victims of America.ISIS did not start in Iraq. And gee I wonder why people would rise up against a violent dictator propped up by foreigners...Last I checked. Assad didn't bomb Iraq. So why did ISIS move to attack him. Blowback does play a role, but you can't use it to explain everything.Yeah when people are constantly bombing and invading a country, the people there never get mad and take up arms...The quickest way to create a terrorist, is to invade his country for no reason and blow up his neighbors and family.
Yeah that summarizes the liberal point of view perfectly....and it's fucking retarded. We didn't create these Islamist fanatic terrorists, they were there long before invaded Iraq. That's who these people are. You don't grab a Koran and decide to start killing in the name of Allah because the US invaded your country. These people were always Islamic terrorists before Syria and part of Iraq fell, the only difference is the terrorists are in power now. Again America never created a single Muslim Terrorist, the shitty culture in the Middle East is what produces the Islamic terrorists.
Which is the core of that struggle.
Just let em put back the pre WWI borders, and I'd bet we'll find out who just wants trouble after that