NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Paul thinks it is bad now.......wait until 2016
Rand Paul is positioning himself to be a professional presidential candidate, following in his father's footsteps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Paul thinks it is bad now.......wait until 2016
Give us an example of how private businesses are supported by public taxes. I'm not saying you're wrong, because there are plenty of examples. The bailouts come to mind, but those were specific cases. How are private businesses, in general, supported by public taxes?
One? I can give you multiple examples.
Take the lunch counter at Woolworth's where the civil rights movement essentially started. The street that the Woolworth's was located on was built and maintained by public taxes. The electrical and water delivery infrastructure was built by public taxes. The court that trademarked Woolworth's name and brand is maintained by public taxes. The police, fire department and sanitation department that provide services for Woolworth's is maintained by public taxes. The highways which trucks haul goods to Woolworth's was built and maintained by public taxes. The employees that populate Woolworths and have basic reading, writing and math skills, have them because they went to public schools, built and maintained by public taxes. I could go on...
It's your opinion that he picked the wrong forum. That the hearing was regarding blowback for U.S. involvement in one civil war seems as good a place as any to point out that doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results might not be the best policy.
It's more than my opinion..the Benghazi hearing was meant to find out what happened at a specific event, not engage in hypotheticals. Which is part of the problem with this sorts of hearings. They become fishing expeditions and forums to introduce issues that are outside the scope of the investigation.
In essence they become a farce.
Alright, so the very same thing can be said regarding my house. Should I be forced to open my house to anybody who wants to come in?
I would agree that these hearings are a farce.
Paul thinks it is bad now.......wait until 2016
Rand Paul is positioning himself to be a professional presidential candidate, following in his father's footsteps.
One? I can give you multiple examples.
Take the lunch counter at Woolworth's where the civil rights movement essentially started. The street that the Woolworth's was located on was built and maintained by public taxes. The electrical and water delivery infrastructure was built by public taxes. The court that trademarked Woolworth's name and brand is maintained by public taxes. The police, fire department and sanitation department that provide services for Woolworth's is maintained by public taxes. The highways which trucks haul goods to Woolworth's was built and maintained by public taxes. The employees that populate Woolworths and have basic reading, writing and math skills, have them because they went to public schools, built and maintained by public taxes. I could go on...
It's more than my opinion..the Benghazi hearing was meant to find out what happened at a specific event, not engage in hypotheticals. Which is part of the problem with this sorts of hearings. They become fishing expeditions and forums to introduce issues that are outside the scope of the investigation.
In essence they become a farce.
Alright, so the very same thing can be said regarding my house. Should I be forced to open my house to anybody who wants to come in?
I would agree that these hearings are a farce.
First? On your private dwelling. No. Again, we have a economic system where private entities are allowed to profit, privately, from the trade of goods and services. That's entirely different than your home. And if that is not equitable to all members of society, then it's either up to government, who regulates commerce, to address that by compelling private firms to service citizens regardless of what they look like or take over that function.
Good move by Rand. Remember Reagan's 11th Commandment
Mama Cass Christie looks more and more like he's Hillary's VP pick
I liked Mike Barnical's comment that Ayn Paul never watched HBO, and if he had, he'd know not to mess with guys from Jersey. (-:
I liked Mike Barnical's comment that Ayn Paul never watched HBO, and if he had, he'd know not to mess with guys from Jersey. (-:
Plus, can a very short guy win? Rand is 5'5". Rubio is 5'7" from what I understand. Can't you just see these guys behind a podium with Christie behind another one??
Alright, so the very same thing can be said regarding my house. Should I be forced to open my house to anybody who wants to come in?
I would agree that these hearings are a farce.
First? On your private dwelling. No. Again, we have a economic system where private entities are allowed to profit, privately, from the trade of goods and services. That's entirely different than your home. And if that is not equitable to all members of society, then it's either up to government, who regulates commerce, to address that by compelling private firms to service citizens regardless of what they look like or take over that function.
That's a distinction without a difference. I profit from being "allowed" to live in my home. My home is located on the corner of two publicly funded roads, and the fire hydrant that the publicly funded fire department in my city would use to put out any theoretical fire is located right in my front yard. Why do I have the right to discriminate in who may enter my home but businesses do not, when their situations are exactly the same as mine?
Section 8.
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Good move by Rand. Remember Reagan's 11th Commandment
Mama Cass Christie looks more and more like he's Hillary's VP pick
I heard a pundit mention the possibility of a Christie/Rand ticket. I don't know who would be in first position...
Alright, so the very same thing can be said regarding my house. Should I be forced to open my house to anybody who wants to come in?
I would agree that these hearings are a farce.
First? On your private dwelling. No. Again, we have a economic system where private entities are allowed to profit, privately, from the trade of goods and services. That's entirely different than your home. And if that is not equitable to all members of society, then it's either up to government, who regulates commerce, to address that by compelling private firms to service citizens regardless of what they look like or take over that function.
That's a distinction without a difference. I profit from being "allowed" to live in my home. My home is located on the corner of two publicly funded roads, and the fire hydrant that the publicly funded fire department in my city would use to put out any theoretical fire is located right in my front yard. Why do I have the right to discriminate in who may enter my home but businesses do not, when their situations are exactly the same as mine?
Good move by Rand. Remember Reagan's 11th Commandment
Mama Cass Christie looks more and more like he's Hillary's VP pick
I heard a pundit mention the possibility of a Christie/Rand ticket. I don't know who would be in first position...
Cant imagine Christie on top
First? On your private dwelling. No. Again, we have a economic system where private entities are allowed to profit, privately, from the trade of goods and services. That's entirely different than your home. And if that is not equitable to all members of society, then it's either up to government, who regulates commerce, to address that by compelling private firms to service citizens regardless of what they look like or take over that function.
That's a distinction without a difference. I profit from being "allowed" to live in my home. My home is located on the corner of two publicly funded roads, and the fire hydrant that the publicly funded fire department in my city would use to put out any theoretical fire is located right in my front yard. Why do I have the right to discriminate in who may enter my home but businesses do not, when their situations are exactly the same as mine?
There is a difference..and it's in the Constitution.
Section 8.
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It's a relatively clear distinction.
Rand Paul, and his followers and supporters are nothing but a big JOKE. Let's see how long he lasts. I don't predict much longer.Wow, like this sounds so familiar..
Where did I hear this before??
Sen. Rand Paul once again put forward his desire for a truce with Gov. Chris Christie on Wednesday afternoon, inviting the New Jersey politician for a beer so that they could kiss and makeup and discuss ideas.
With Gov. Christie its gotten a little too personal, so were ready to kiss and makeup, the Kentucky Republican said to Foxs Neil Cavuto. I think its time to dial it down. I think weve got enough Democrats to attack and maybe Republicans can quit attacking Republicans.
Read more: Rand Paul calls for Chris Christie beer summit - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com
Wow, like this sounds so familiar..
Where did I hear this before??
Sen. Rand Paul once again put forward his desire for a truce with Gov. Chris Christie on Wednesday afternoon, inviting the New Jersey politician for a beer so that they could kiss and makeup and discuss ideas.
With Gov. Christie its gotten a little too personal, so were ready to kiss and makeup, the Kentucky Republican said to Foxs Neil Cavuto. I think its time to dial it down. I think weve got enough Democrats to attack and maybe Republicans can quit attacking Republicans.
Read more: Rand Paul calls for Chris Christie beer summit - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com
I liked Mike Barnical's comment that Ayn Paul never watched HBO, and if he had, he'd know not to mess with guys from Jersey. (-:
Plus, can a very short guy win? Rand is 5'5". Rubio is 5'7" from what I understand. Can't you just see these guys behind a podium with Christie behind another one??
Speaking at the White House on Friday, President Obama addressed the verdict in the George Zimmerman trial for the killing of Trayvon Martin for the first time since 2012, when he declared that if he had a son, he’d look like Martin. This time, Obama said, “Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago.”
Obama: 'I Have the Potential of Bringing People Together'
The more Rand Paul pokes a stick at democrats the more popular he becomes. Christie on the other hand is less palatable the more he kisses up to the demonrats.