Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, like this sounds so familiar..
Where did I hear this before??
Sen. Rand Paul once again put forward his desire for a truce with Gov. Chris Christie on Wednesday afternoon, inviting the New Jersey politician for a beer so that they could kiss and makeup and discuss ideas.
With Gov. Christie its gotten a little too personal, so were ready to kiss and makeup, the Kentucky Republican said to Foxs Neil Cavuto. I think its time to dial it down. I think weve got enough Democrats to attack and maybe Republicans can quit attacking Republicans.
Read more: Rand Paul calls for Chris Christie beer summit - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com
The more Rand Paul pokes a stick at democrats the more popular he becomes. Christie on the other hand is less palatable the more he kisses up to the demonrats.
Today's republican party has it's lowest % of supporters since before Reagan, and just over half of them want the party to be more conservative. Stick with it, it's working great for you. So great we had a landslide election for a guy named Hussein, with 2% growth and 8% unemployment, and requiring we all buy insurance from for profit corporations.
Just more whining and name calling.
Paul thinks it is bad now.......wait until 2016
Paul thinks it is bad now.......wait until 2016
Republicans will be eating each other alive, knowing they have no chance at winning. It should be a very funny thing to watch. Demographics are changing and the Republican Party refuses to change at all. What they don't get is that they don't have to change their core beliefs; they just need to be reasonable about them. They better learn to pick their fights down the road, because at this point, they are fighting a losing battle and are on the verge of becoming irrelevant on the national level.
First? On your private dwelling. No. Again, we have a economic system where private entities are allowed to profit, privately, from the trade of goods and services. That's entirely different than your home. And if that is not equitable to all members of society, then it's either up to government, who regulates commerce, to address that by compelling private firms to service citizens regardless of what they look like or take over that function.
That's a distinction without a difference. I profit from being "allowed" to live in my home. My home is located on the corner of two publicly funded roads, and the fire hydrant that the publicly funded fire department in my city would use to put out any theoretical fire is located right in my front yard. Why do I have the right to discriminate in who may enter my home but businesses do not, when their situations are exactly the same as mine?
Don't waste your breath on Shallow.
I agree with you. If a business doesn't want to serve someone or conduct business with them thats they're perogative. They can ask them to leave. No law of the land says a business has do business with someone they don't want to do business with.
Notice Shallow doesn't mention the taxes those businesses pay every year. Taxes that are used for roads, bridges, police, fire and anything else a Town or City is responsible for. Those businesses will be paying way more in taxes than any person will ever be paying.
That's a distinction without a difference. I profit from being "allowed" to live in my home. My home is located on the corner of two publicly funded roads, and the fire hydrant that the publicly funded fire department in my city would use to put out any theoretical fire is located right in my front yard. Why do I have the right to discriminate in who may enter my home but businesses do not, when their situations are exactly the same as mine?
There is a difference..and it's in the Constitution.
Section 8.
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It's a relatively clear distinction.
So a clause relating to free trade, and the Fourth Amendment which says people shall be secure in their own property. Kind of makes the opposite argument from what you're claiming they do.
Wow, like this sounds so familiar..
Where did I hear this before??
Sen. Rand Paul once again put forward his desire for a truce with Gov. Chris Christie on Wednesday afternoon, inviting the New Jersey politician for a beer so that they could kiss and makeup and discuss ideas.
With Gov. Christie its gotten a little too personal, so were ready to kiss and makeup, the Kentucky Republican said to Foxs Neil Cavuto. I think its time to dial it down. I think weve got enough Democrats to attack and maybe Republicans can quit attacking Republicans.
Read more: Rand Paul calls for Chris Christie beer summit - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com
Wait...this is supposed to be a bad or a stupid thing, right?
There is a difference..and it's in the Constitution.
It's a relatively clear distinction.
So a clause relating to free trade, and the Fourth Amendment which says people shall be secure in their own property. Kind of makes the opposite argument from what you're claiming they do.
Opposite? How so?
I heard a pundit mention the possibility of a Christie/Rand ticket. I don't know who would be in first position...
Cant imagine Christie on top
yeah, but you're quoting putin and pravda. LOL
Why doesn't Rand Paul come up to the Jersey Shore and have a beer?
He can see real time where all that "government pork" he voted against accomplished
Why doesn't Rand Paul come up to the Jersey Shore and have a beer?
He can see real time where all that "government pork" he voted against accomplished
Why would anyone in his right mind spend a vacation in that shit hole? Is Camden on the sightseeing tour?
Why doesn't Rand Paul come up to the Jersey Shore and have a beer?
He can see real time where all that "government pork" he voted against accomplished
Why would anyone in his right mind spend a vacation in that shit hole? Is Camden on the sightseeing tour?
Millions of people vacation on the Jersey Shore
Camden was not affected by Hurricane Sandy.....learn some geography
Why would anyone in his right mind spend a vacation in that shit hole? Is Camden on the sightseeing tour?
Millions of people vacation on the Jersey Shore
Camden was not affected by Hurricane Sandy.....learn some geography
Why would anyone in their right mind, aside from some New York dumb fucks, want to vacation in that shit hole? Perplexing. What a waste of money.
Why would anyone in his right mind spend a vacation in that shit hole? Is Camden on the sightseeing tour?
Millions of people vacation on the Jersey Shore
Camden was not affected by Hurricane Sandy.....learn some geography
Why would anyone in their right mind, aside from some New York dumb fucks, want to vacation in that shit hole? Perplexing. What a waste of money.
