Discussion in 'Congress' started by rayboyusmc, Nov 18, 2008.
like you'd understand it
And Joy Behar,Bill Mahr,Rosie O'donnell....
You mean like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd...nope,that would be you lefties that keep defending and re-electing the miscreants that caused this debacle.
Sure, and you guys routinely state that WW2 was what brought us out of the Depression. Yet in WW2 the government spent massive amounts of money, and raised the top tax to nearly 100%. You pile two contridictory arguements into one paragraph. Both my grandparents lost everything in the First Great Republican Depression, and my parent grew up in it. All thought that Roosevelt was the man that led the country out of it. You revisionists are simply viewing history through ideological glasses, and ignoring reality.
FDR was and always will be a hero to the majority of Americans. And your ideological rants will be consigned to the compost heap, where they belong.
And you are still rewriting history. Remember the lies concerning Iraq developing unpiloted planes capable of reaching mainland USA from ship launches? And the truth was that there experiments in that direction were not even at the level of a meet of model plane amatuers on a weekend at the county level here in the US.
Like back your assertations, or just be considered a lying ass.
Phil 'Enron' Gramm.
Yes they spent millions of dollars on actual products and goods.(tanks,planes. Trucks, Jeeps,ammo,uniforms. etc) Which served as a direct massive stimulus to the economy.
Not millions of dollars on cooperate bail outs, and tax credits to people who do not even pay fed income tax, and other pork ladened social spending programs.
FDR's new deal policies came well before the war, and were a hamper on recovering from the Depression. Only time, and yes a world war actually got us out of the depression.
No I don't. I remeber leftist bloggers claiming he said that but Bush himself never did.
It is another of those urban legends like the one where in it is claimed Bush said that Saddam had a part in 9/11 when in fact in a NY-Times piece he clearly said exactly the opposite.
Did he state that intelligence had suggested that The Iraqis might have access to some small RPV's that could be used to deliver chemical munitions? Did he claim that they would be used to deliver such munitions to the US proper? NO.
You really believe that, don't you?
Separate names with a comma.