Racists of the racist democrat party can't always contain their racism...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,977
52,255
2,290
Here we have two racists in the democrat racist party showing their true, racist colors.....

The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Loretta Sanchez implies racial bias after being snubbed by Obama in California Senate race

President Obama’s decision to snub Democrat Rep. Loretta Sanchez in the one-party California Senate race has triggered a testy intraparty feud that threatens to split the Democratic coalition along racial lines.

Ms. Sanchez unloaded on the president last week after he endorsed her opponent, Democrat Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, then followed up by suggesting in a Spanish-language interview that race may have been a factor.

“I think they have, what he said they have, is a friendship of many years. She is African-American, as is he. They know each other through meetings,” Ms. Sanchezsaid in the Friday interview on Univision 19 as translated by the Los Angeles Times.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.


they want power......that is the thing they want most in the world.........power gives them the ability to attack their race enemies, and to enrich their own race allies........that is why all of the racists are in the democrat party...it is the only party that puts acquisition of power over all other concerns.......

Can you tell me that the following core groups of the democrat party are no openly, and proudly racist?

la raza

black lies murder

the naacp

the congressional black caucus

the black panthers

the nation of islam

or that these leaders are not openly racist, or sympathetic to racists....

bill clinton....good friend and political mentor j. william fulbright, hard core segregationist.

barak obama......sat in openly and proudly racist church for 20 years...good freinds with openly and proudly racist pastor jeremiah wright....who married obama and michelle and baptized their children...

al sharpton.......racist, anti semite, anti cop....has been to the White House close to 80 times?

jesse jackson.....racist.....



Tell me those groups and people listed above are not racists.......
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.

Do you have a link where Trump "calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers." You win! Over 300 million US citizens are committing more murders than 11 million illegals.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.


Hey.....I'm not the only one saying he is a racist.........Senator Sanchez is saying it........you know...the hispanic, democrat racist...


Ms. Sanchez unloaded on the president last week after he endorsed her opponent, Democrat Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, then followed up by suggesting in a Spanish-language interview that race may have been a factor.
 
Democrats bad, Republicans good. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz...............

Partisanshitheadedness is how we got where we are and how we're kept where we are. So you must like this.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.


FDR is dead, you dont' have defend the democrats any more....they are corrupt, socialist, and still racist.....in fact they promote affirmative action...the most overtly racist program in US history.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.


Hey.....I'm not the only one saying he is a racist.........Senator Sanchez is saying it........you know...the hispanic, democrat racist...


Ms. Sanchez unloaded on the president last week after he endorsed her opponent, Democrat Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, then followed up by suggesting in a Spanish-language interview that race may have been a factor.

I am on your side, but Ms Sanchez is a Representative running for the Senate seat in California.
 
So, the president didn't endorse one specific Latino, so that shows all Democrats are racists?

It's not the dumbest or the whiniest thread out there, but it is quite stupid and whiny.

We all know that if Obama had endorsed the Latino, 2aguy would be screaming about affirmative action, like Buckeye did. They need to get together and keep their race-baiting talking points consistent.
 
They can almost never contain their racism.

These people find "all lives matter", just about the most racist and offensive thing out there.
 
So, the president didn't endorse one specific Latino, so that shows all Democrats are racists?

It's not the dumbest or the whiniest thread out there, but it is quite stupid and whiny.

We all know that if Obama had endorsed the Latino, 2aguy would be screaming about affirmative action, like Buckeye did. They need to get together and keep their race-baiting talking points consistent.

Well the candidate herself said that....and it's because the democrats always go their first...never talk about issues....just call people names...and we laugh at you guys everytime one says stuff like that......boooohoooooo...
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Funny thing about history -- once you examine it a ton of bullshit myths just disintegrate.

Take the above jumble of inchoate rambling. Please. Back in the mid-19th century when the Republican Party started up, and the Democratic Party was already established (which is why I will never use the term "GOP"), the new upstart party was the Liberals, taking up the Abolitionist flag and well to the left of the establishment Democrats. The Whig Party at the same time was disintegrating because it was fatally divided over the nagging question of slavery. The new Republicans thus took on the abolitionist element of those Whigs, who brought with them the philosophy of Big Government. The Democratic Party meanwhile was the repository of smaller, decentralized government, articulated as "states' rights". This was most extreme in the South of course, where secession on that basis had been advocated since before the DP existed.

So at least at the time of its inception the Republican Party seems to have cared very much about race, or at least about the institution of slavery. That was originally the whole point. And at the same time they were the party of doing big things with government, the first of which was Reconstruction. In other words "a huge central government was deemed necessary for races to cease and desist inflicting their will on members of other races".

So you're 180 degrees wrong there, chief.

Of course that's not where the respective parties lie today. That shift came about at the turn of the century when the RP abandoned its populism and got friendly with the interests of corporations and the wealthy, and the DP took on the Populist movement, bringing in the constituencies of working classes, immigrants, Jews and Catholics, all those elements the Klan rose up to oppose, and by the time that populism culminated with FDR, blacks as well, where they've been ever since.



FDR is dead, you dont' have defend the democrats any more....they are corrupt, socialist, and still racist.....in fact they promote affirmative action...the most overtly racist program in US history.

And in fact the first manifestation of affirmative action can be traced to the aforementioned Republican Reconstruction in the land grants to freed slaves, colloquially packaged as "forty acres and a mule". It wasn't called by that name of course; the modern wave of AA is generally marked with Richard Nixon's "Philadelphia Plan" (1969).


OK, history lesson's over, y'all can stop whimpering and come out from under the sofa now.
 
So, the president didn't endorse one specific Latino, so that shows all Democrats are racists?

It's not the dumbest or the whiniest thread out there, but it is quite stupid and whiny.

We all know that if Obama had endorsed the Latino, 2aguy would be screaming about affirmative action, like Buckeye did. They need to get together and keep their race-baiting talking points consistent.


The Latino claimed it was racism........I know it is racism.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Funny thing about history -- once you examine it a ton of bullshit myths just disintegrate.

Take the above jumble of inchoate rambling. Please. Back in the mid-19th century when the Republican Party started up, and the Democratic Party was already established (which is why I will never use the term "GOP"), the new upstart party was the Liberals, taking up the Abolitionist flag and well to the left of the establishment Democrats. The Whig Party at the same time was disintegrating because it was fatally divided over the nagging question of slavery. The new Republicans thus took on the abolitionist element of those Whigs, who brought with them the philosophy of Big Government. The Democratic Party meanwhile was the repository of smaller, decentralized government, articulated as "states' rights". This was most extreme in the South of course, where secession on that basis had been advocated since before the DP existed.

So at least at the time of its inception the Republican Party seems to have cared very much about race, or at least about the institution of slavery. That was originally the whole point. And at the same time they were the party of doing big things with government, the first of which was Reconstruction. In other words "a huge central government was deemed necessary for races to cease and desist inflicting their will on members of other races".

So you're 180 degrees wrong there, chief.

Of course that's not where the respective parties lie today. That shift came about at the turn of the century when the RP abandoned its populism and got friendly with the interests of corporations and the wealthy, and the DP took on the Populist movement, bringing in the constituencies of working classes, immigrants, Jews and Catholics, all those elements the Klan rose up to oppose, and by the time that populism culminated with FDR, blacks as well, where they've been ever since.



FDR is dead, you dont' have defend the democrats any more....they are corrupt, socialist, and still racist.....in fact they promote affirmative action...the most overtly racist program in US history.

And in fact the first manifestation of affirmative action can be traced to the aforementioned Republican Reconstruction in the land grants to freed slaves, colloquially packaged as "forty acres and a mule". It wasn't called by that name of course; the modern wave of AA is generally marked with Richard Nixon's "Philadelphia Plan" (1969).


OK, history lesson's over, y'all can stop whimpering and come out from under the sofa now.


No twit.....the government was doing the one thing it is supposed to do....protecting people....they were protecting the newly freed slaves from their former democrat masters....that isn't big government...that is government doing it's job......once the people are protected....the government needs to go back to being small....

moron.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Funny thing about history -- once you examine it a ton of bullshit myths just disintegrate.

Take the above jumble of inchoate rambling. Please. Back in the mid-19th century when the Republican Party started up, and the Democratic Party was already established (which is why I will never use the term "GOP"), the new upstart party was the Liberals, taking up the Abolitionist flag and well to the left of the establishment Democrats. The Whig Party at the same time was disintegrating because it was fatally divided over the nagging question of slavery. The new Republicans thus took on the abolitionist element of those Whigs, who brought with them the philosophy of Big Government. The Democratic Party meanwhile was the repository of smaller, decentralized government, articulated as "states' rights". This was most extreme in the South of course, where secession on that basis had been advocated since before the DP existed.

So at least at the time of its inception the Republican Party seems to have cared very much about race, or at least about the institution of slavery. That was originally the whole point. And at the same time they were the party of doing big things with government, the first of which was Reconstruction. In other words "a huge central government was deemed necessary for races to cease and desist inflicting their will on members of other races".

So you're 180 degrees wrong there, chief.

Of course that's not where the respective parties lie today. That shift came about at the turn of the century when the RP abandoned its populism and got friendly with the interests of corporations and the wealthy, and the DP took on the Populist movement, bringing in the constituencies of working classes, immigrants, Jews and Catholics, all those elements the Klan rose up to oppose, and by the time that populism culminated with FDR, blacks as well, where they've been ever since.



FDR is dead, you dont' have defend the democrats any more....they are corrupt, socialist, and still racist.....in fact they promote affirmative action...the most overtly racist program in US history.

And in fact the first manifestation of affirmative action can be traced to the aforementioned Republican Reconstruction in the land grants to freed slaves, colloquially packaged as "forty acres and a mule". It wasn't called by that name of course; the modern wave of AA is generally marked with Richard Nixon's "Philadelphia Plan" (1969).


OK, history lesson's over, y'all can stop whimpering and come out from under the sofa now.


No twit.....the government was doing the one thing it is supposed to do....protecting people....they were protecting the newly freed slaves from their former democrat masters....that isn't big government...that is government doing it's job......once the people are protected....the government needs to go back to being small....

moron.

And it was doing it in big, far-reaching ways, which was what the Whigs (like Lincoln for one) were about. Which is the opposite of what you posted. Because your grasp of American history goes back to approximately last Thursday. Were it not, it would not be equally lost on you that the "government going back to being small" would coincide with the small-government philosophy of the Democratic Party of that time --- which is also the opposite of what you posted.

NEITHER of which have anything to do with racism, which is strike three.

Having it both ways: Moronic.
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.


they want power......that is the thing they want most in the world.........power gives them the ability to attack their race enemies, and to enrich their own race allies........that is why all of the racists are in the democrat party...it is the only party that puts acquisition of power over all other concerns.......

Can you tell me that the following core groups of the democrat party are no openly, and proudly racist?

la raza

black lies murder

the naacp

the congressional black caucus

the black panthers

the nation of islam

or that these leaders are not openly racist, or sympathetic to racists....

bill clinton....good friend and political mentor j. william fulbright, hard core segregationist.

barak obama......sat in openly and proudly racist church for 20 years...good freinds with openly and proudly racist pastor jeremiah wright....who married obama and michelle and baptized their children...

al sharpton.......racist, anti semite, anti cop....has been to the White House close to 80 times?

jesse jackson.....racist.....



Tell me those groups and people listed above are not racists.......
? Why would they be Republicans when the Repubs are endorsed by the KKK and other white supremacist groups?
 
The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....
Sure. That's why Clinton LISTENS to Black Lives Matter and why Trump warns he will be the "Law and Order Candidate" and stop all this divisiveness. That's why the Democrats want to find another way than deport 11 million illegals, while Trump calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers and brings up individual incidents of illegals murdering, when it is statistically proven that more US citizens are committing murders than illegals are.
Sure, the Democrats are racist. <eyeroll> You are so confused, Guy.

Do you have a link where Trump "calls them mostly rapists and drug dealers." You win! Over 300 million US citizens are committing more murders than 11 million illegals.
Pull the transcript of his speech announcing he was running for president. I believe my paraphrase is accurate. The statistics comparing two groups are always adjusted for size by using per 100,000 or whatever.
 
Here we have two racists in the democrat racist party showing their true, racist colors.....

The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Loretta Sanchez implies racial bias after being snubbed by Obama in California Senate race

President Obama’s decision to snub Democrat Rep. Loretta Sanchez in the one-party California Senate race has triggered a testy intraparty feud that threatens to split the Democratic coalition along racial lines.

Ms. Sanchez unloaded on the president last week after he endorsed her opponent, Democrat Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, then followed up by suggesting in a Spanish-language interview that race may have been a factor.

“I think they have, what he said they have, is a friendship of many years. She is African-American, as is he. They know each other through meetings,” Ms. Sanchezsaid in the Friday interview on Univision 19 as translated by the Los Angeles Times.

A bit like all you RWnuts who said Obama only won the presidency because he's black...

...lol. Yes, we told you so.
 
Here we have two racists in the democrat racist party showing their true, racist colors.....

The democrat party is the party of racism....racists of all colors flock to the party because it is the party that wants a huge central government....and a huge central government is necessary for racists to inflict their will on the members of other races....

They don't flock to the Republican party for 2 reasons....1) the Republican party doesn't care about race 2) increasing the government size is not the core concern of the republican party.....so two reasons why racists don't end up being republicans.....

Loretta Sanchez implies racial bias after being snubbed by Obama in California Senate race

President Obama’s decision to snub Democrat Rep. Loretta Sanchez in the one-party California Senate race has triggered a testy intraparty feud that threatens to split the Democratic coalition along racial lines.

Ms. Sanchez unloaded on the president last week after he endorsed her opponent, Democrat Attorney GeneralKamala Harris, then followed up by suggesting in a Spanish-language interview that race may have been a factor.

“I think they have, what he said they have, is a friendship of many years. She is African-American, as is he. They know each other through meetings,” Ms. Sanchezsaid in the Friday interview on Univision 19 as translated by the Los Angeles Times.

A bit like all you RWnuts who said Obama only won the presidency because he's black...

...lol. Yes, we told you so.

Everybody knows Obama got elected because of Joe Biden's endorsement.

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said
 

Forum List

Back
Top