Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #41
Link?
You gotta lotta balls asking for Links with 99% of the unfounded/undocuments bullshit you post
jesus you turned into a complete liar in no time on this site huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link?
You gotta lotta balls asking for Links with 99% of the unfounded/undocuments bullshit you post
Link?
You gotta lotta balls asking for Links with 99% of the unfounded/undocuments bullshit you post
jesus you turned into a complete liar in no time on this site huh?
'Left-wing television commentators must be made to respect ... the law'
Rachel Maddow, MSNBC sued for defamation
Oh well, maybe it'll help her ratings, which are currently in the tank.
'Left-wing television commentators must be made to respect ... the law'
Rachel Maddow, MSNBC sued for defamation
Oh well, maybe it'll help her ratings, which are currently in the tank.
WND? Dude, I thought you were better than this. seriously, I did. Damn.
Well, sponge bob's ratings are through the roof, i'm sure.
'Left-wing television commentators must be made to respect ... the law'
Rachel Maddow, MSNBC sued for defamation
Oh well, maybe it'll help her ratings, which are currently in the tank.
You gotta lotta balls asking for Links with 99% of the unfounded/undocuments bullshit you post
jesus you turned into a complete liar in no time on this site huh?
Where have I ever lied ? Link ?
If you ask me the same of you, I'll just post your posting history.
You're not only the biggest liar on here - you're the dumbest poster on the Internet.
She shoved the healthcare bill down our throats. Then she voted
* NO on the Border Security Bill
* NO on making the Republican tax cuts permanent
* NO on eliminating the marriage penalty
* NO on eliminating the death tax
* NO on creating Health Savings Accounts
* NO on the Defense of Marriage Act
* NO on the 1996 Welfare Reform Law (and NO on its reauthorization)
* NO on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance
* NO on banning partial-birth abortion
* NO on requiring a photo I.D. to ensure only legal voters vote
* NO on the Patriot Act
* NO on authorizing domestic tracking of terrorists
* NO on military tribunals and new interrogation rules for terrorist detainees
But this isn't about her shitty leadership, it's about Boehner - so, carry on.
When the speaker votes they are representing their constintuencies, and I can assure you Congresswoman Pelosi represented hers to perfection. You may not agree with those votes, but they are not performance indicators.
The Speaker of the House votes as a representative of HER consitituents?
So the Speaker of the House (Pelosi, or whomever), voted with the best interests of San Franciscans at heart, while seated in Washington, D.C. ?
Are you freaking high on meth?
The Speaker of the House votes as a representative of HER consitituents?
So the Speaker of the House (Pelosi, or whomever), voted with the best interests of San Franciscans at heart, while seated in Washington, D.C. ?
Are you freaking high on meth?
Why would you attack me personally? I realize that turbo infueled vitriol is the Rep producer on USMB, but I refuse to play.
Yes, the Speaker still represents his/her district. The Speaker need not be an elected member of Congress, but all have been.
Well, you must be on something to post a blatant lie as you did
The Speaker of the House, in that role, represents the House of Representatives, and the interests of the American people. Pelosi's voting record - as I pointed out - does not represent the overwhelming majority of the American people. She voted, according to lobby checks received. The jist of this thread was to discredit Boehner - who in no way, has performed as miserably as his predecessor.
Need more clairification?
Let us know when he wins, he's always good for a laugh at press conferences.World "NUT"Daily only has a reporter on staff that has been nominated for two Pulitzers and the same gentleman holds the second most seniority on the W.H. Press Corps, that site is pretty lame let me tell you.
and? that means it's not a rightwingnut rag?
which writer, btw? and where was he working when nominated?
btw, i have a friend who won a pulitzer... doesn't make any newspaper she works for a quality paper.
Les Kinsolving was nominated twice for Pulitzers while at WND .
He once made a statement on the radio criticizing his fellow Christians for not taking a stronger stand about the "gay" rights lobby promoting homosexuality in schools. According to the ministry announcement, he made a strong reference to Muslims taking the issue more seriously than Christians, referring to Islamic law, but did not condone their practices. It was Bradlee's intent to focus attention on the issue, not to advocate harm to anyone, the statement said.
Despite the clear statement by Dean on his ministry's website and elsewhere that he was not calling for the execution of homosexuals, according to the announcement, "MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and others seized on and accused Dean on her show of supporting the killing of homosexuals, as is the practice in some radical Islamic countries. This seriously has harmed Dean and the ministry, who pride themselves on respect and love for all people."
Republican Sen. Paul Gazelka was a guest on Bradlee Deans Saturday evening radio program to talk about the amendment to put a ban on same-sex marriage into the Minnesota Constitution. Over the course of the program, which is part of Deans controversial ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide, Gazelka spoke about activist judges and concerns that Republicans might be labeled homophobes or bigots. Dean and sidekick Jake McMillian said that homosexuals are criminals and America will be destroyed if homosexuality isnt criminalized.
We want you to cover this topic of the marriage amendment, McMillian said to Gazelka. The immoral crowd, a lot of folks dont want to see this happen.
Sen. Gazelka to Bradlee Dean: Gay marriage ban supporters aren’t bigots | Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media.
On his blog, controversial minister Bradlee Dean of You Can Run But You Cannot Hide ministries took credit for the passage of a bill that put a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on the ballot in 2012. Dean said that hes been attacked by the media who are pushing an illegal agenda and claims incorrectly that sodomy is against the law in the United States. I believe that I have done my duty, he wrote. The people of the great state of Minnesota now have the power to vote. It is now up to you to decide for your posterity what kind of future that you want to have for them. The power is in your hands.
Dean complained about the treatment he has received by the media. When doing high schools across the country we noticed that when the media began to push an illegal agenda called the gay agenda (sodomy is illegal in this country) we started getting attacked from the media, he wrote.
Sodomy laws, which were often used to imprison gays and lesbians as recently as the 1980s, were declared unconstitutional in Minnesota in 2001 and nationwide in 2003.
Dean has frequently spoken of the need to enforce sodomy laws against gays and lesbians who he views as criminals.
Bradlee Dean takes credit for passing anti-gay marriage amendment | Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media.
Well, he's honest about it.Anybody know the MSNBC president's name as well as you know FOX? Well now you do, it's Phil Griffin and according to the article Griffin admits that MSNBC caters to the progressive left.
'Left-wing television commentators must be made to respect ... the law'
Rachel Maddow, MSNBC sued for defamation
Oh well, maybe it'll help her ratings, which are currently in the tank.
WND? Dude, I thought you were better than this. seriously, I did. Damn.
Better than what? I was merely posting a report of a pending lawsuit. You may draw your own decisions/discuss. I never ONCE said anything disrespectful regarding Ms. Maddow in this entire thread. I post - you discuss. Message/discussion board, correct?
WND? Dude, I thought you were better than this. seriously, I did. Damn.
Better than what? I was merely posting a report of a pending lawsuit. You may draw your own decisions/discuss. I never ONCE said anything disrespectful regarding Ms. Maddow in this entire thread. I post - you discuss. Message/discussion board, correct?
Is your next link going to come from Foxnews.com?
Better than what? I was merely posting a report of a pending lawsuit. You may draw your own decisions/discuss. I never ONCE said anything disrespectful regarding Ms. Maddow in this entire thread. I post - you discuss. Message/discussion board, correct?
Is your next link going to come from Foxnews.com?
The other networks are DNC lapdogs. The coverage of the gun running by democrats proves that.
Anybody know the MSNBC president's name as well as you know FOX? Well now you do, it's Phil Griffin and according to the article Griffin admits that MSNBC caters to the progressive left.
Anybody know the MSNBC president's name as well as you know FOX? Well now you do, it's Phil Griffin and according to the article Griffin admits that MSNBC caters to the progressive left.
Ironically the Right's defense of the bias of guys like Hannity, Limbaugh, and many others has for ages been that they don't pretend otherwise.
I guess if MSNBC, from the top down, isn't pretending otherwise, they merit comparable praise and defense from the Right.
Certainly the Right wouldn't want to be two-faced about something like this now would it?
WND? Dude, I thought you were better than this. seriously, I did. Damn.
Better than what? I was merely posting a report of a pending lawsuit. You may draw your own decisions/discuss. I never ONCE said anything disrespectful regarding Ms. Maddow in this entire thread. I post - you discuss. Message/discussion board, correct?
Is your next link going to come from Foxnews.com?