Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
Why not ask when did they stop beating their wives, as well
I know of no liberal/progressive who believes in redistribution of any kind.
We have the number one economy on the planet as a result of both the public and private sectors working together: government regulation and oversight protects business from its darker side as well as providing the foundational infrastructure needed to allow businesses to succeed and flourish; tax dollars and sound public policy are as much contributors to a given businesss success as the hard work and dedication of that business owner.
Thats the essence of progressivism a pragmatic approach rejecting blind dogma from both the left and right, having nothing to do with redistribution.
well SOMEONE is hitting his favorite cut-and-paste links.The idea that we got here with out creating debt is hilarious. We haven't had a balanced budget in 60 years. The debt was at 5 trillion before the wars. We increased our debt with 2 wars and unregulated Government social programs. It did not happen over night, or did it happen just under Bush or Obama.
By the way Obama is running up the debt twice as fast as Bush did.
Obama inheirited an annual interest payment of about $450 billion because of the money Reagan and the Bushes borrowed. Three years of that comes to about $1.2 trillion. Kindly subtract that from Obama's debt and add it to the Reagan-Bushes.
Trillions of that borrowed money ended up in the pockets of those in this country who least needed it:
Total U S Debt
Snipped for bullshit
Other than highlighting the stupidity of Cammpbell, they are meaningless. Context - always kind of puts the numbers into... well.... context. 
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
And yet again, this troll bozo neglects to continue the numbers for when Obamalama took over, spending at record rates...
Filthy progressive scum
I told you....he started off having to pay $450 billion a year of interest on the Republican's debt. Three years of that is more than a trillion dollars.
In case you don't reali e how much $450 billion is we spend about $100 billion on education and less than that on the infrastructure. I don't blame you...I'd be desperate for a way to hide the reckless spending and borrowing of Reagan and the Bush family myself.
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
The problem is... due to "trickle down" we don't have a "Free market". we have a rigged market that panders to big business and kills labor and most recently.. small business.
Thanks for the deregulation depression and for gutting the nonrich and our infrastructure. Time for intelligent gov't again....Your party is batshytte crazy....
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
Why not ask when did they stop beating their wives, as well
I know of no liberal/progressive who believes in redistribution of any kind.
We have the number one economy on the planet as a result of both the public and private sectors working together: government regulation and oversight protects business from its darker side as well as providing the foundational infrastructure needed to allow businesses to succeed and flourish; tax dollars and sound public policy are as much contributors to a given businesss success as the hard work and dedication of that business owner.
Thats the essence of progressivism a pragmatic approach rejecting blind dogma from both the left and right, having nothing to do with redistribution.
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
oh gawd.
When was this period of "adhering to free markets" that got us to the "number 1 economy on the planet"?
We have the number 1 economy on the planet and got here in a relatively short time by adhering to free markets.
My question: Why do you think Redistribution is a better deal?
oh gawd.
When was this period of "adhering to free markets" that got us to the "number 1 economy on the planet"?
The industrial revolution - when our money was backed by gold.
oh gawd.
When was this period of "adhering to free markets" that got us to the "number 1 economy on the planet"?
The industrial revolution - when our money was backed by gold.
oh, you mean when workers were little more than slaves? Gotcha...
Frank does not understand that capitalism, regulated or not, is a system of redistribution of wealth.
I think the issue for him is that the government plays a role in our capitalistic system.
Frank does not understand that capitalism, regulated or not, is a system of redistribution of wealth.
I think the issue for him is that the government plays a role in our capitalistic system.
That is only one of its functions.
