Purpose Of Tea Party Is Clear But Obama Is Not Listening

[007]

Like I said, it's all fluff and no substance without studies or analysis' with cause and effect. The "majority of the American" people, and likely all of this board, don't have those analysis.'

I know that's a tough pill to swallow regarding the debt. and all, but before you go ranting at Congress every time they spend a dime, you should first determine through study and research if said spending you're ranting about saves in the long-run. If it does, you're ranting baselessly. If it doesn't, you've got a point...............but the fact of the matter is that most of the people hooting and hollaring are doing so based on shear ignorance........................and pointing that out doesn't make one an elitist, it makes them a realist. Realists are what this Country needs, not ranting Partisans across both lines.

It's not a pill, and the only thing that's hard to swallow is OWEbama and his out of touch, out of control spending, period. Not a hard thing to grasp GT. Most have, you're making far too hard on yourself.

No, most have spoken in vagueries that they don't really know shit about at all. Like your comment "you can't spend your way out of debt."

Ignorant shit like that indicates that you haven't done much by way of studying what the hell you're talking about, so why talk at all? To act like "your side's better" in the Political football game? It's childish.

Be a man and face facts.

You can spend your way out of debt. It's called "investment." Look into it.

Aside from that, your own graph shows surplus via Clinton, ass-raping last Bush budget, and OPbama budgets taking the debt back down. Where does that make your point, exactly again? (mind you, that's YOUR graph).

Well, sorry the debate had to end this way, but I can't go on talking to an ignorant sons a bitch who's going to lie, distort the facts and go with some lame ass line as though OWEbama has actual done a mother fucking thing to help this country, when the truth is he's done more damage in his first year and spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. Investment my ass. That's the lamest crock of shit you've spread so far.

I'm going to book mark this thread, so when the conservatives take control in November, and they CUT SPENDING, and the ECONOMY TURNS AROUND, I can shove this back in your ignorant face.

Even OWEbama knows he's fucked up. The porkulous didn't work, and he knows he's spent too much money. I guess you're the only one left in the country that still thinks the nation being trillions of dollars in debt, thanks to OWEbama, is a GOOD thing. Sheeezuz GT, I thought you were smarter than that, but I guess you're just another ass licking obamabot that's full of his kool aide.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38890

 

[Dick Tuck]

The '09 budget is a Republican President's Budget (I mention the President b/c apparently you're citing Obama for our messes).....and after that what happend on your graph during Obama years?

Nope. Not true GT. The '09 spending on that graph is AAAALLLLLL OWEbama and the dems, who controlled the purse strings for the last two years of the Bush presidency. It doesn't have one damn thing to do with a single republican.

So let's put OWEbama in perspective on the spending scale...

FOXNews.com - Obama Shatters Spending Record for First-Year Presidents

Obama Spent More Than Every President COMBINED!

There's just no way to defend that shit. Not with excuses about analysis, studies or barking at the moon. You don't have to be a genius to know that enough is enough.

You don't even have a clue on Bush requesting and signing TARP.

 

[masquerade]

You're all just simple minded idiot fucks who act like you have some in depth understanding of how a very complex fucking Government works when it's Miles-high over your loo-loo heads.

Exactly how I view Obama. Way WAY over his head!

 

[CountofTuscany]

Last week all but two Republican Senators voted against a bill that cut taxes on small businesses.

What else was in the bill? You know, that habit our illustrious leaders have of tacking crap onto the back of a good bill can sometimes require decent Senators (that is assuming we have any decent Senators) to vote against something they would like to support. Perhaps, we should stop the offensive hiding of other bills behind decent ones? Just an idea.

Line item veto is essential to cleaning up the clutter in Washington. Every initiative should stand on it's own merit.

 

[007]

The '09 budget is a Republican President's Budget (I mention the President b/c apparently you're citing Obama for our messes).....and after that what happend on your graph during Obama years?

Nope. Not true GT. The '09 spending on that graph is AAAALLLLLL OWEbama and the dems, who controlled the purse strings for the last two years of the Bush presidency. It doesn't have one damn thing to do with a single republican.

So let's put OWEbama in perspective on the spending scale...

FOXNews.com - Obama Shatters Spending Record for First-Year Presidents

Obama Spent More Than Every President COMBINED!

There's just no way to defend that shit. Not with excuses about analysis, studies or barking at the moon. You don't have to be a genius to know that enough is enough.

You don't even have a clue on Bush requesting and signing TARP.

The clue here is I'm the only one that's posted a link to the facts. All I've gotten from you and your partner obamabot is hyperbole and ignorant bull shit.

 

[Full-Auto]

Tired, used up, worn out? Bush's last six quarters were a complete failure that put our economic system at the edge of the abyss. It took Obama 5 months to start the turn around. Yet the fool tea baggers claim that the man who essentially saved our financial system is a socialist. The fucked up shtick doesn't belong to me.

First of all, dick, you need to stop dreaming of having a big, sweaty ball sack full of testicles dropped in your mouth, homo.

Second, there is no turn around. There's only trillions of dollars of MORE DEBT, thanks to the MORON, community organizer in the White House. He's a total fucking walking, talking, disaster.

Take a look, it ain't pretty...

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Now look at this. It ain't pretty either, and it's AAAAALLLLLLLL thanks to OWEbama. He has FUCKED this country more than ALL THE OTHER PRESIDENTS PUT TOGETHER, and you need to get that through your pin shaped head.

The '09 budget was Bush's parting shot. You're own graph shows Obama digging us out of the hole that the neocons left him.

The 2009 budget that democrats refused to send to bush in its entirety because it did not cointain enough spending.

Try not being a clown all the time.

 

[CountofTuscany]

The '09 budget is a Republican President's Budget (I mention the President b/c apparently you're citing Obama for our messes).....and after that what happend on your graph during Obama years?

Nope. Not true GT. The '09 spending on that graph is AAAALLLLLL OWEbama and the dems, who controlled the purse strings for the last two years of the Bush presidency. It doesn't have one damn thing to do with a single republican.

So let's put OWEbama in perspective on the spending scale...

FOXNews.com - Obama Shatters Spending Record for First-Year Presidents

Obama Spent More Than Every President COMBINED!

There's just no way to defend that shit. Not with excuses about analysis, studies or barking at the moon. You don't have to be a genius to know that enough is enough.

Great point. It is congress, not the president who controls it.

 

[DiamondDave]

The real douche baggery of the tea baggers is their position on tax policy. These fucking idiots don't want to extend Obama's huge tax cuts to the middle class, instead insisting on extending the Bush hand outs to the top 2%.

The real ass-hattery of your progressives is your support for selective equal treatment by the government against the 'evil rich' you envy so much....

You see... a lot of 'tea partiers' and a lot of REPs and a lot of Conservatives support a flat tax system that brings back into the tax paying fold the ~50% that pay ZERO in income taxes... and is blind equal treatment across the board with zero exceptions

Oh... and BTW.. the 'Bush tax cuts' were not just to the top 2%.. .but nice try

 

[G.T.]

It's not a pill, and the only thing that's hard to swallow is OWEbama and his out of touch, out of control spending, period. Not a hard thing to grasp GT. Most have, you're making far too hard on yourself.

No, most have spoken in vagueries that they don't really know shit about at all. Like your comment "you can't spend your way out of debt."

Ignorant shit like that indicates that you haven't done much by way of studying what the hell you're talking about, so why talk at all? To act like "your side's better" in the Political football game? It's childish.

Be a man and face facts.

You can spend your way out of debt. It's called "investment." Look into it.

Aside from that, your own graph shows surplus via Clinton, ass-raping last Bush budget, and OPbama budgets taking the debt back down. Where does that make your point, exactly again? (mind you, that's YOUR graph).

Well, sorry the debate had to end this way, but I can't go on talking to an ignorant sons a bitch who's going to lie, distort the facts and go with some lame ass line as though OWEbama has actual done a mother fucking thing to help this country, when the truth is he's done more damage in his first year and spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. Investment my ass. That's the lamest crock of shit you've spread so far.

I'm going to book mark this thread, so when the conservatives take control in November, and they CUT SPENDING, and the ECONOMY TURNS AROUND, I can shove this back in your ignorant face.

Even OWEbama knows he's fucked up. The porkulous didn't work, and he knows he's spent too much money. I guess you're the only one left in the country that still thinks the nation being trillions of dollars in debt, thanks to OWEbama, is a GOOD thing. Sheeezuz GT, I thought you were smarter than that, but I guess you're just another ass licking obamabot that full of his kool aide.

I am smarter than YOU, apparently.

-2009 was a Republican President's signed budget. Fact.(and most people know that Congress presents the budget, but it was first YOU blaming a President for it (Obama), while simultaneously dismissing a President's guilt of it (Bush) by citing Congress.
-Investments are a form of spending for future returns (profit). Fact.
-The 2010 Budget, per your own graph, begins to DECREASE. Fact. Dem Congress and Senate during this time. Fact.
-The Economy has come out of Recession, circa 2009 (June). Fact.
-Unemployment is a lagging indicator of the Economy. Fact.
-Obama professed over and over again that it would be hard and take a long time to recover from the recession. Fact.
-Since Obama took office, the jobs lost per month(already occuring) have dramatically decreased. Fact.
-I never said spending doesn't need to be cut, I said that most people parlaying "cut spending" platitudes don't know a fucking lick of what they're talking about. Fact.

Debunk any one of those, and you can call me whatever ranting name you want out of your angry assed "tired tired tired of gubbamint.....except my side's gubbamint" ole ass...................................let's just talk about facts and leave your feminine emotionalism and Obama knee-jerk name calling out of things. It's a cloud of judgement.

 

[Full-Auto]

No, most have spoken in vagueries that they don't really know shit about at all. Like your comment "you can't spend your way out of debt."

Ignorant shit like that indicates that you haven't done much by way of studying what the hell you're talking about, so why talk at all? To act like "your side's better" in the Political football game? It's childish.

Be a man and face facts.

You can spend your way out of debt. It's called "investment." Look into it.

Aside from that, your own graph shows surplus via Clinton, ass-raping last Bush budget, and OPbama budgets taking the debt back down. Where does that make your point, exactly again? (mind you, that's YOUR graph).

Well, sorry the debate had to end this way, but I can't go on talking to an ignorant sons a bitch who's going to lie, distort the facts and go with some lame ass line as though OWEbama has actual done a mother fucking thing to help this country, when the truth is he's done more damage in his first year and spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. Investment my ass. That's the lamest crock of shit you've spread so far.

I'm going to book mark this thread, so when the conservatives take control in November, and they CUT SPENDING, and the ECONOMY TURNS AROUND, I can shove this back in your ignorant face.

Even OWEbama knows he's fucked up. The porkulous didn't work, and he knows he's spent too much money. I guess you're the only one left in the country that still thinks the nation being trillions of dollars in debt, thanks to OWEbama, is a GOOD thing. Sheeezuz GT, I thought you were smarter than that, but I guess you're just another ass licking obamabot that full of his kool aide.

I am smarter than YOU, apparently.

-2009 was a Republican President's signed budget. Fact.
-Investments are a form of spending for future returns (profit). Fact.
-The 2010 Budget, per your own graph, begins to DECREASE. Fact.
-The Economy has come out of Recession, circa 2009 (June). Fact.
-Unemployment is a lagging indicator of the Economy. Fact.
-Obama professed over and over again that it would be hard and take a long time to recover from the recession. Fact.
-Since Obama took office, the jobs lost per month(already occuring) have dramatically decreased. Fact.
-I never said spending doesn't need to be cut, I said that most people parlaying "cut spending" platitudes don't know a fucking lick of what they're talking about. Fact.

Debunk any one of those, and you can call me whatever ranting name you want out of your angry assed "tired tired tired of gubbamint.....except my side's gubbamint" ole ass...................................let's just talk about facts and leave your feminine emotionalism and Obama knee-jerk name calling out of things. It's a cloud of judgement.

Explain why part of the budget went to Obama for signature before continuing with the fallacies.

 

[Trajan]

since its inception, the tea party movement has been about getting the radical right back in power.

can you please list some of of these radical ideas etc. ? Seriously......





I just don't see it myself....I see scared angry folks, and they have woken up to the fact that we, the country, have all hit the wall, there is no tomorrow at this point. What we do in the next year or 2 will have very long lasting effects on this country and no longer have anyone ion DC who really gives a crap. T

They ALL live in their bubble , I don't know recall what the article is called, I read it several weeks ago but basically it spoke to the point that more so than ever, DC has their own class now in effect, the 'political class',

don't care if the Representative is from San Fran of Cheyenne, Wyoming, theres something wrong, in that they don't appear to listen to us and are not providing prudent oversight for the collective, they are out for themselves.

The consumer credit throw away society is over-leveraged and running on fumes just when the first wave of retiring baby boomers is heading for the barn....

The safety net Ponzi scheme we created 60 years ago and which for many decades sounded great and was solvent, has been put on red alert, thyey are now as of this moment paying out mroe than they are taking in in withholding.

Now that may change as the economic improves but we hit a demographic wall in 10 years no matter what we do, because the Government could not even bank the surplus in the good years, we are in even greater trouble.

Health care?

Is anyone, right left Indy or sideways really confident in this plan?

We have allowed gov. to build fund and breed expectations that we cannot possibly meet.

Defense, AFDC and all of its cousins, Schip, whatever....its got to be chopped down and back.

Each parties representation is by and large in the hands of the usual....they are basically whores.

You may not like the side of the number line in that the center right and Indy's is making noise and tired of the same old same old ( they are not even discussing 'social' changes etc btw) ...its about the failure of government and our responsibility as we put them there.

If this were a religious right thing social thing and truly radical in that sense I would not even bother defending them......

 

[G.T.]

Well, sorry the debate had to end this way, but I can't go on talking to an ignorant sons a bitch who's going to lie, distort the facts and go with some lame ass line as though OWEbama has actual done a mother fucking thing to help this country, when the truth is he's done more damage in his first year and spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. Investment my ass. That's the lamest crock of shit you've spread so far.

I'm going to book mark this thread, so when the conservatives take control in November, and they CUT SPENDING, and the ECONOMY TURNS AROUND, I can shove this back in your ignorant face.

Even OWEbama knows he's fucked up. The porkulous didn't work, and he knows he's spent too much money. I guess you're the only one left in the country that still thinks the nation being trillions of dollars in debt, thanks to OWEbama, is a GOOD thing. Sheeezuz GT, I thought you were smarter than that, but I guess you're just another ass licking obamabot that full of his kool aide.

I am smarter than YOU, apparently.

-2009 was a Republican President's signed budget. Fact.
-Investments are a form of spending for future returns (profit). Fact.
-The 2010 Budget, per your own graph, begins to DECREASE. Fact.
-The Economy has come out of Recession, circa 2009 (June). Fact.
-Unemployment is a lagging indicator of the Economy. Fact.
-Obama professed over and over again that it would be hard and take a long time to recover from the recession. Fact.
-Since Obama took office, the jobs lost per month(already occuring) have dramatically decreased. Fact.
-I never said spending doesn't need to be cut, I said that most people parlaying "cut spending" platitudes don't know a fucking lick of what they're talking about. Fact.

Debunk any one of those, and you can call me whatever ranting name you want out of your angry assed "tired tired tired of gubbamint.....except my side's gubbamint" ole ass...................................let's just talk about facts and leave your feminine emotionalism and Obama knee-jerk name calling out of things. It's a cloud of judgement.

Explain why part of the budget went to Obama for signature before continuing with the fallacies.

0% of what I said was fallacy.


Also, food for thought:

The Obama Administration also made four significant accounting changes, to more accurately report the total spending by the Federal government. The four changes were: 1) account for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (”overseas military contingencies”) in the budget rather than through the use of “emergency” supplemental spending bills; 2) assume the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation; 3) account for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements; and 4) anticipate the inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. These changes would make the debt over ten years look $2.7 trillion larger, but that debt was always there. It was just hidden.[58][59]

 

[Full-Auto]

I am smarter than YOU, apparently.

-2009 was a Republican President's signed budget. Fact.
-Investments are a form of spending for future returns (profit). Fact.
-The 2010 Budget, per your own graph, begins to DECREASE. Fact.
-The Economy has come out of Recession, circa 2009 (June). Fact.
-Unemployment is a lagging indicator of the Economy. Fact.
-Obama professed over and over again that it would be hard and take a long time to recover from the recession. Fact.
-Since Obama took office, the jobs lost per month(already occuring) have dramatically decreased. Fact.
-I never said spending doesn't need to be cut, I said that most people parlaying "cut spending" platitudes don't know a fucking lick of what they're talking about. Fact.

Debunk any one of those, and you can call me whatever ranting name you want out of your angry assed "tired tired tired of gubbamint.....except my side's gubbamint" ole ass...................................let's just talk about facts and leave your feminine emotionalism and Obama knee-jerk name calling out of things. It's a cloud of judgement.

Explain why part of the budget went to Obama for signature before continuing with the fallacies.

0% of what I said was fallacy.


Also, food for thought:

The Obama Administration also made four significant accounting changes, to more accurately report the total spending by the Federal government. The four changes were: 1) account for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (”overseas military contingencies”) in the budget rather than through the use of “emergency” supplemental spending bills; 2) assume the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation; 3) account for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements; and 4) anticipate the inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. These changes would make the debt over ten years look $2.7 trillion larger, but that debt was always there. It was just hidden.[58][59]

You made a proclamation you are smarter then us. Yet can not answer a simple question.

The answer is, it did not contain enough spending. So run along junior, it was an obvious attempt to mislead.

 

[G.T.]

Explain why part of the budget went to Obama for signature before continuing with the fallacies.

0% of what I said was fallacy.


Also, food for thought:

The Obama Administration also made four significant accounting changes, to more accurately report the total spending by the Federal government. The four changes were: 1) account for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (”overseas military contingencies”) in the budget rather than through the use of “emergency” supplemental spending bills; 2) assume the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation; 3) account for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements; and 4) anticipate the inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. These changes would make the debt over ten years look $2.7 trillion larger, but that debt was always there. It was just hidden.[58][59]

You made a proclamation you are smarter then us. Yet can not answer a simple question.

The answer is, it did not contain enough spending. So run along junior, it was an obvious attempt to mislead.

More platitudes, no substance.

I didn't say I was smarter than any "Us," I said it to one Gentleman who apparently couldn't keep his cool about him.

 

[Full-Auto]

0% of what I said was fallacy.


Also, food for thought:

The Obama Administration also made four significant accounting changes, to more accurately report the total spending by the Federal government. The four changes were: 1) account for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (”overseas military contingencies”) in the budget rather than through the use of “emergency” supplemental spending bills; 2) assume the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation; 3) account for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements; and 4) anticipate the inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. These changes would make the debt over ten years look $2.7 trillion larger, but that debt was always there. It was just hidden.[58][59]

You made a proclamation you are smarter then us. Yet can not answer a simple question.

The answer is, it did not contain enough spending. So run along junior, it was an obvious attempt to mislead.

More platitudes, no substance.

I didn't say I was smarter than any "Us," I said it to one Gentleman who apparently couldn't keep his cool about him.

LOL STILL CAN NOT ADDRESS THE POINT. I would have read the rest of your rant, However I have no interest in fantasies.

 

[uscitizen]

Why should Obama listen to TP? None of them voted for Obama.

 

[G.T.]

There's no point to address. 100% of what I said was true and you can't offer proof to the contrary. The Emergency spending bills were both Presidents' concerted efforts, the budget for 2009 signed in October '08 was before Obama was elected.

If you want to talk about merits, discuss why 2010 to 2012, per Pale's own chart and AFTER having ADDED traditionally "hidden" spending TO THEIR BUDGET, the Fed. Budgets decrease?

 

[007]

0% of what I said was fallacy.


Also, food for thought:

The Obama Administration also made four significant accounting changes, to more accurately report the total spending by the Federal government. The four changes were: 1) account for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (”overseas military contingencies”) in the budget rather than through the use of “emergency” supplemental spending bills; 2) assume the Alternative Minimum Tax will be indexed for inflation; 3) account for the full costs of Medicare reimbursements; and 4) anticipate the inevitable expenditures for natural disaster relief. These changes would make the debt over ten years look $2.7 trillion larger, but that debt was always there. It was just hidden.[58][59]

You made a proclamation you are smarter then us. Yet can not answer a simple question.

The answer is, it did not contain enough spending. So run along junior, it was an obvious attempt to mislead.

More platitudes, no substance.

I didn't say I was smarter than any "Us," I said it to one Gentleman who apparently couldn't keep his cool about him.

You posted not one link to what you claim as fact GT. Get with program and post links to back up your claims.

The fact of the matter is, you have completely ignored the links that I DID post, to the FACTS that obama has spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. He is a virtual spending machine, along with Pelosi and Reid, they have spent the next THREE GENERATIONS OF AMERICANS into certain OBLIVION. Your attempts to sugar coat and ignore that fact is nothing short of dishonest and alarming. At some point you're going to have to wake up.

 

[Trajan]

No, most have spoken in vagueries that they don't really know shit about at all. Like your comment "you can't spend your way out of debt."

Ignorant shit like that indicates that you haven't done much by way of studying what the hell you're talking about, so why talk at all? To act like "your side's better" in the Political football game? It's childish.

Be a man and face facts.

You can spend your way out of debt. It's called "investment." Look into it.

Aside from that, your own graph shows surplus via Clinton, ass-raping last Bush budget, and OPbama budgets taking the debt back down. Where does that make your point, exactly again? (mind you, that's YOUR graph).

Well, sorry the debate had to end this way, but I can't go on talking to an ignorant sons a bitch who's going to lie, distort the facts and go with some lame ass line as though OWEbama has actual done a mother fucking thing to help this country, when the truth is he's done more damage in his first year and spent more money than all the other Presidents put together. Investment my ass. That's the lamest crock of shit you've spread so far.

I'm going to book mark this thread, so when the conservatives take control in November, and they CUT SPENDING, and the ECONOMY TURNS AROUND, I can shove this back in your ignorant face.

Even OWEbama knows he's fucked up. The porkulous didn't work, and he knows he's spent too much money. I guess you're the only one left in the country that still thinks the nation being trillions of dollars in debt, thanks to OWEbama, is a GOOD thing. Sheeezuz GT, I thought you were smarter than that, but I guess you're just another ass licking obamabot that full of his kool aide.

I am smarter than YOU, apparently.

-2009 was a Republican President's signed budget. Fact.(and most people know that Congress presents the budget, but it was first YOU blaming a President for it (Obama), while simultaneously dismissing a President's guilt of it (Bush) by citing Congress.
-Investments are a form of spending for future returns (profit). Fact.
-The 2010 Budget, per your own graph, begins to DECREASE. Fact. Dem Congress and Senate during this time. Fact.
-The Economy has come out of Recession, circa 2009 (June). Fact.
-Unemployment is a lagging indicator of the Economy. Fact.
-Obama professed over and over again that it would be hard and take a long time to recover from the recession. Fact.
-Since Obama took office, the jobs lost per month(already occuring) have dramatically decreased. Fact.
-I never said spending doesn't need to be cut, I said that most people parlaying "cut spending" platitudes don't know a fucking lick of what they're talking about. Fact.

Debunk any one of those, and you can call me whatever ranting name you want out of your angry assed "tired tired tired of gubbamint.....except my side's gubbamint" ole ass...................................let's just talk about facts and leave your feminine emotionalism and Obama knee-jerk name calling out of things. It's a cloud of judgement.

a few things if I may GT.

Yes, agreed, jobs are a lagging indicator, yet the previous economies in recession(s) (data i.e. samples/examples that provide proof for this trend ) didn't have the advantage of the trillion + dollar boost this economy was injected with right out of the gate and over time.

Ergo, its over, the time for the lagging to stop and yield Solid gains, ala gdp etc. has passed. Obama own advisers have said this is so.

The jobs lost per month blurb, well, you do realize (again if you look at the past samples and examples) you'll see that this is perfectly normal...there are just so many jobs to be shed while keeping the doors of a business open, its all in a matter of how fast co's businesses large and small want to get lean/leaner........everyone large and small basically started to cut from the onset of the housing bubble bursting which began to become very obvious in mid 08.......of course there isn't a half million or three quarter of a millions jobs being lost every month, even job losses run out of steam.

And what of the budget for 2011?

 

[Full-Auto]

There's no point to address. 100% of what I said was true and you can't offer proof to the contrary. The Emergency spending bills were both Presidents' concerted efforts, the budget for 2009 signed in October '08 was before Obama was elected.

If you want to talk about merits, discuss why 2012 to 2012, per Pale's own chart and AFTER having ADDED traditionally "hidden" spending TO THEIR BUDGET, the Fed. Budgets decrease?

Intentionally misleading on the signed budget is disingenuous.

I did think the BUT BUT BUT defense was cute though.