Pulling Back the Curtain on the Ugly GOP

actually "divide and conquer" perfectly describes the screwing the Jackass Party has given to Black Americans. if Dems get their amnesty and it IS amnesty; it wont be White people suffering the most; it will be one of the most loyal Democrat voting blocks. Black unemployment is already much higher than Hispanic unemployment and about TWICE White unemployment. Are these the people left-wingers are referring to when they say those good ol Hispanic workers are only doing the jobs "Americans wont do"??? libs; are losers and hypocrites
 
Elections would have been in November of 2008 ..................

Palin held office till, July 3, 2009 when she resigned ...............

You would like to advocate she was slow, so if the causation is as you suggest then the reaction was delayed by about 8 months .................

I know, I know, those fucking little pesky details will make you look like a dumb bitch every time.

You never did say, did you thank the forum mates for helping with home work??

She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.
 
Obama resigned his senate seat after he was elected to higher office, whereas, Palin resigned as governor after losing the election.

Which election did she loose??

I mean she was acting governor and resigned for money related issues as has been already pointed out in previous post in this thread.

You seem to have comprehension problems, how is an aspiring law clerk that is getting the forum to do her homework ever gonna graduate if she can't even understand what others post??

What election did she "loose", you ask? If you were following along, then you would know McCain & she "loosed" when Obama & Biden won. But you knew that ...

You can attribute any reason you want for her resignation ... she couldn't stand the heat ... she didn't want to spend money to defend herself against complaints ... she thought of herself first and the people who elected her last ... whatever ...

But we all know that she did in fact quit her state office and cashed in on her "celebrity".

You don't have much in your arsenal except foul language and silly personal attacks.

Your ignorant ass lost the conversation when you Ebonics stated "LOOSED" instead of "lost"

Past tense of loose .................

oh dear ...

I thought I was being a little disrespectful making fun of your typo ... or what I thought was your typo ...

But the way you dish out insults, my little dig was mild in comparison ...

Now I know it wasn't a typo ...

so you really think "lost" is the past tense of the word "loose"?

Oh dear ...

so you're ONE of those. oh you'll be on ignore real soon, little one
carry on little miss snob

Stephanie, where is your sense of humor? how about irony? do you appreciate irony? doesn't it make you roll on the floor laughing that DrGloomy was calling me the "ignorant ass" when he should have been looking in his own mirror?

What do you think of his dark and petulant displays of foul language? does that warrant the dreaded "ignore"? if so, please warn him because I'm sure he would be devastated just like I am.

But maybe you could laugh a little rather than take all of this too seriously. :)
 
Elections would have been in November of 2008 ..................

Palin held office till, July 3, 2009 when she resigned ...............

You would like to advocate she was slow, so if the causation is as you suggest then the reaction was delayed by about 8 months .................

I know, I know, those fucking little pesky details will make you look like a dumb bitch every time.

You never did say, did you thank the forum mates for helping with home work??

She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?
 
actually "divide and conquer" perfectly describes the screwing the Jackass Party has given to Black Americans. if Dems get their amnesty and it IS amnesty; it wont be White people suffering the most; it will be one of the most loyal Democrat voting blocks. Black unemployment is already much higher than Hispanic unemployment and about TWICE White unemployment. Are these the people left-wingers are referring to when they say those good ol Hispanic workers are only doing the jobs "Americans wont do"??? libs; are losers and hypocrites

Hey ... that's what George W. Bush said years ago ... I didn't know he was a lib. :)
 
Which election did she loose??

I mean she was acting governor and resigned for money related issues as has been already pointed out in previous post in this thread.

You seem to have comprehension problems, how is an aspiring law clerk that is getting the forum to do her homework ever gonna graduate if she can't even understand what others post??

What election did she "loose", you ask? If you were following along, then you would know McCain & she "loosed" when Obama & Biden won. But you knew that ...

You can attribute any reason you want for her resignation ... she couldn't stand the heat ... she didn't want to spend money to defend herself against complaints ... she thought of herself first and the people who elected her last ... whatever ...

But we all know that she did in fact quit her state office and cashed in on her "celebrity".

You don't have much in your arsenal except foul language and silly personal attacks.

Your ignorant ass lost the conversation when you Ebonics stated "LOOSED" instead of "lost"

Past tense of loose .................

oh dear ...

I thought I was being a little disrespectful making fun of your typo ... or what I thought was your typo ...

But the way you dish out insults, my little dig was mild in comparison ...

Now I know it wasn't a typo ...

so you really think "lost" is the past tense of the word "loose"?

Oh dear ...

so you're ONE of those. oh you'll be on ignore real soon, little one
carry on little miss snob

Stephanie, where is your sense of humor? how about irony? do you appreciate irony? doesn't it make you roll on the floor laughing that DrGloomy was calling me the "ignorant ass" when he should have been looking in his own mirror?

What do you think of his dark and petulant displays of foul language? does that warrant the dreaded "ignore"? if so, please warn him because I'm sure he would be devastated just like I am.

But maybe you could laugh a little rather than take all of this too seriously. :)


Oh, I see you met Staph Infection.

:rofl:
 
Elections would have been in November of 2008 ..................

Palin held office till, July 3, 2009 when she resigned ...............

You would like to advocate she was slow, so if the causation is as you suggest then the reaction was delayed by about 8 months .................

I know, I know, those fucking little pesky details will make you look like a dumb bitch every time.

You never did say, did you thank the forum mates for helping with home work??

She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.
 
Thought for the day: On pulling the curtain back on the the GOP, we now have 16 clowns to pick from and not a single one of them should ever get his or her fingers anywhere near the nuclear codes.

Here, just to help us all keep track:

CKeD1EwUEAAEyEC.png_large.png


2016 madness, here we come!!!
 
Thought for the day: On pulling the curtain back on the the GOP, we now have 16 clowns to pick from and not a single one of them should ever get his or her fingers anywhere near the nuclear codes.

Here, just to help us all keep track:

CKeD1EwUEAAEyEC.png_large.png


2016 madness, here we come!!!

It's amazing Obama has lowered the bar to such depths that most of these asshats are an improvement.

Look, the reason Trump is surging is because every since the Snow bitch sold us down the river, life long pubs have been firing the party in droves. Trump has the balls to say what needs said. Enough with Americas diversity experiment.

If Trump is successful in getting whites to the poll, this could get interesting

-Geaux
 
Donald Trump: Why he scares the heck out of liberals and RINO's

The dictionary describes fear as an unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous, likely to cause pain, or a threat. That illustrates exactly the effect Donald Trump is having in the political arena. Fear also makes strange bedfellows for not only does the left hate him but so does a segment of the GOP-more affectionately known as RINO's (Republicans In Name Only). Why, you ask, would his own party wish a bolt of lightening would strike him? Good question.

Donald Trump Why he scares the heck out of liberals and RINO s - San Diego Politics Examiner.com
 
John McCain will go down in the history books as one of the better US Senators of his time, a war hero, and an effective legislator. Donald Trump will likely be rich until the day he passes from this earth into whatever oblivion in the afterlife awaits him and those that bother to remember him will remember his failed presidential bid and what an ass he made of himself for a brief time in the Summer of 2015. Neither man will suffer any long term effects of Mr. Trump's moronic statements. The true damage of what Donald Trump said about war hero John McCain was to further reveal the true thoughts of the GOP rank and file.

This doesn't fade so easily. If John McCain were not such a distinguished Republican, one may easily chalk it up to his being "yesterday's news" and that failed candidates in the Genral usually enjoy no second act (see Mitt Romney and Al Gore for reference). The hard-right doesn't like McCain being a member of that "gang of eight" who sought to rise above politics and negotiate an immigration bill.

For a clue of why it is more than that, you can look at that bill and see one of it's other authors, Marco Rubio, suffers little in the way of hard right angst. So what is it about this episode that does so much damage? For the answer, consider Rubio. Rubio is a candidate for President whereas McCain is not this time around. Rubio still has the chance to thwart a presidential bid by Hillary Clinton so he cannot be cast asunder so quickly as McCain has been. And there inlies the problem. It isn't that what Trump says has any basis in reality. Any grown-up knows this is the case. Anyone who saw combat has taken heroic stances for their nation. Captured combat soldiers hold a special place of reverence for Americans of all political stripes. What Mr. Trump did was say something to get more TV cameras pointed in his direction. Ordinarily, such a brazen publicity grab would be greeted with cynnacism and ridicule. However, Trump still has the ability to cause the President some discomfort and peril for Clinton--the presumptive Democratic nominee. So, for the same reasons as Rubio, the rank and file suspend the counsel of the better angels of their nature and decide to applaud Trump because he can do some damage to the other side; maybe.

Republicans cannot pretend to just be "letting the process" play out when Donald Trump is topping polls. Nor can they deny they feel this way about McCain and Mexicans ("Likewise, tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border. The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world.").

Hillary Clinton has a likability problem that she has worked hard to correct. She is not running a campaign based on enevitability or a presumption of such. She has learned from her mistakes. Still, she will need the votes of independents to become the next President. Independents are looking and they are seeing a Party that seems more interested in stoking the fires of bigotry, anger and hatred than steering the ship of State to any greater future. Trump could care less. The cameras are pointed at him and that is all he is interested in.

Trump is going to be short-lived as a presidential candidate and his television career is over. I think you are right he will fade to obscurity now.

What he said about McCain is so over the top disgusting it strikes all Americans as such, as you also noted. Rather bizarre and very telling that John Kerry immediately came to McCain's defense but when Kerry was getting swiftboated McCain was silent.

Character reveals itself in the most trying moment. And lack thereof as well.

In fairness Mc Cain called the attack on Kerry as “dishonest and dishonorable” and told the White house to do the same.

McCain deplores anti-Kerry ad - politics NBC News

The thing is Jeb is trying to criticise Trump when his own brother did it twice first to McCain and then to Kerry.

It tells you how two faced the GOP when they say support the troops, but hey they will cut veteran budgets all day.
 
Elections would have been in November of 2008 ..................

Palin held office till, July 3, 2009 when she resigned ...............

You would like to advocate she was slow, so if the causation is as you suggest then the reaction was delayed by about 8 months .................

I know, I know, those fucking little pesky details will make you look like a dumb bitch every time.

You never did say, did you thank the forum mates for helping with home work??

She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.


only the "Alaska news" lost interest??

OR maybe they had nothing and you're a silly but typical left-wing idiot who thinks just making an accusation makes something true, engaging in laughable Palinphobia?
 
John McCain will go down in the history books as one of the better US Senators of his time, a war hero, and an effective legislator. Donald Trump will likely be rich until the day he passes from this earth into whatever oblivion in the afterlife awaits him and those that bother to remember him will remember his failed presidential bid and what an ass he made of himself for a brief time in the Summer of 2015. Neither man will suffer any long term effects of Mr. Trump's moronic statements. The true damage of what Donald Trump said about war hero John McCain was to further reveal the true thoughts of the GOP rank and file.

This doesn't fade so easily. If John McCain were not such a distinguished Republican, one may easily chalk it up to his being "yesterday's news" and that failed candidates in the Genral usually enjoy no second act (see Mitt Romney and Al Gore for reference). The hard-right doesn't like McCain being a member of that "gang of eight" who sought to rise above politics and negotiate an immigration bill.

For a clue of why it is more than that, you can look at that bill and see one of it's other authors, Marco Rubio, suffers little in the way of hard right angst. So what is it about this episode that does so much damage? For the answer, consider Rubio. Rubio is a candidate for President whereas McCain is not this time around. Rubio still has the chance to thwart a presidential bid by Hillary Clinton so he cannot be cast asunder so quickly as McCain has been. And there inlies the problem. It isn't that what Trump says has any basis in reality. Any grown-up knows this is the case. Anyone who saw combat has taken heroic stances for their nation. Captured combat soldiers hold a special place of reverence for Americans of all political stripes. What Mr. Trump did was say something to get more TV cameras pointed in his direction. Ordinarily, such a brazen publicity grab would be greeted with cynnacism and ridicule. However, Trump still has the ability to cause the President some discomfort and peril for Clinton--the presumptive Democratic nominee. So, for the same reasons as Rubio, the rank and file suspend the counsel of the better angels of their nature and decide to applaud Trump because he can do some damage to the other side; maybe.

Republicans cannot pretend to just be "letting the process" play out when Donald Trump is topping polls. Nor can they deny they feel this way about McCain and Mexicans ("Likewise, tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border. The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world.").

Hillary Clinton has a likability problem that she has worked hard to correct. She is not running a campaign based on enevitability or a presumption of such. She has learned from her mistakes. Still, she will need the votes of independents to become the next President. Independents are looking and they are seeing a Party that seems more interested in stoking the fires of bigotry, anger and hatred than steering the ship of State to any greater future. Trump could care less. The cameras are pointed at him and that is all he is interested in.

Trump is going to be short-lived as a presidential candidate and his television career is over. I think you are right he will fade to obscurity now.

What he said about McCain is so over the top disgusting it strikes all Americans as such, as you also noted. Rather bizarre and very telling that John Kerry immediately came to McCain's defense but when Kerry was getting swiftboated McCain was silent.

Character reveals itself in the most trying moment. And lack thereof as well.

In fairness Mc Cain called the attack on Kerry as “dishonest and dishonorable” and told the White house to do the same.

McCain deplores anti-Kerry ad - politics NBC News

The thing is Jeb is trying to criticise Trump when his own brother did it twice first to McCain and then to Kerry.

It tells you how two faced the GOP when they say support the troops, but hey they will cut veteran budgets all day.


except that they didnt cut the veteran's budget.
 
....................but obama DID cut troop's budget; troops that are actually serving. yea Dems care for the troops/ libs are losers who lie to themselves
 
Elections would have been in November of 2008 ..................

Palin held office till, July 3, 2009 when she resigned ...............

You would like to advocate she was slow, so if the causation is as you suggest then the reaction was delayed by about 8 months .................

I know, I know, those fucking little pesky details will make you look like a dumb bitch every time.

You never did say, did you thank the forum mates for helping with home work??

She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.


only the "Alaska news" lost interest??

OR maybe they had nothing and you're a silly but typical left-wing idiot who thinks just making an accusation makes something true, engaging in laughable Palinphobia?

Palin (aka Sarah-cuda) who once said that the difference between Hockey Moms (like her) and pit bulls was lipstick resigned in disgrace because they had nothing on her.

Listen...you believe what you want to believe but at some point, you've got to stop lying to yourself. It's what grown ups do.

I, for one, would welcome her back with open arms to any GOP function she wishes to attend. Every second of exposure from her is a net positive for the Democrats and the center-left.

She is a moron.
 
She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.


only the "Alaska news" lost interest??

OR maybe they had nothing and you're a silly but typical left-wing idiot who thinks just making an accusation makes something true, engaging in laughable Palinphobia?

Palin (aka Sarah-cuda) who once said that the difference between Hockey Moms (like her) and pit bulls was lipstick resigned in disgrace because they had nothing on her.

Listen...you believe what you want to believe but at some point, you've got to stop lying to yourself. It's what grown ups do.

I, for one, would welcome her back with open arms to any GOP function she wishes to attend. Every second of exposure from her is a net positive for the Democrats and the center-left.

She is a moron.


she doesnt know you exist; doesnt care what you say about her even if she saw it
you're obsessed with her; she couldnt care less what you think.

but she is richer than you, more well-known, and you're whining about her on a message board
 
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.


only the "Alaska news" lost interest??

OR maybe they had nothing and you're a silly but typical left-wing idiot who thinks just making an accusation makes something true, engaging in laughable Palinphobia?

Palin (aka Sarah-cuda) who once said that the difference between Hockey Moms (like her) and pit bulls was lipstick resigned in disgrace because they had nothing on her.

Listen...you believe what you want to believe but at some point, you've got to stop lying to yourself. It's what grown ups do.

I, for one, would welcome her back with open arms to any GOP function she wishes to attend. Every second of exposure from her is a net positive for the Democrats and the center-left.

She is a moron.


she doesnt know you exist; doesnt care what you say about her even if she saw it
you're obsessed with her; she couldnt care less what you think.

but she is richer than you, more well-known, and you're whining about her on a message board

Wow...that was pathetic but I'm sure you have a lot of shortcomings. Its just one of many.
 
John McCain will go down in the history books as one of the better US Senators of his time, a war hero, and an effective legislator. Donald Trump will likely be rich until the day he passes from this earth into whatever oblivion in the afterlife awaits him and those that bother to remember him will remember his failed presidential bid and what an ass he made of himself for a brief time in the Summer of 2015. Neither man will suffer any long term effects of Mr. Trump's moronic statements. The true damage of what Donald Trump said about war hero John McCain was to further reveal the true thoughts of the GOP rank and file.

This doesn't fade so easily. If John McCain were not such a distinguished Republican, one may easily chalk it up to his being "yesterday's news" and that failed candidates in the Genral usually enjoy no second act (see Mitt Romney and Al Gore for reference). The hard-right doesn't like McCain being a member of that "gang of eight" who sought to rise above politics and negotiate an immigration bill.

For a clue of why it is more than that, you can look at that bill and see one of it's other authors, Marco Rubio, suffers little in the way of hard right angst. So what is it about this episode that does so much damage? For the answer, consider Rubio. Rubio is a candidate for President whereas McCain is not this time around. Rubio still has the chance to thwart a presidential bid by Hillary Clinton so he cannot be cast asunder so quickly as McCain has been. And there inlies the problem. It isn't that what Trump says has any basis in reality. Any grown-up knows this is the case. Anyone who saw combat has taken heroic stances for their nation. Captured combat soldiers hold a special place of reverence for Americans of all political stripes. What Mr. Trump did was say something to get more TV cameras pointed in his direction. Ordinarily, such a brazen publicity grab would be greeted with cynnacism and ridicule. However, Trump still has the ability to cause the President some discomfort and peril for Clinton--the presumptive Democratic nominee. So, for the same reasons as Rubio, the rank and file suspend the counsel of the better angels of their nature and decide to applaud Trump because he can do some damage to the other side; maybe.

Republicans cannot pretend to just be "letting the process" play out when Donald Trump is topping polls. Nor can they deny they feel this way about McCain and Mexicans ("Likewise, tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border. The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world.").

Hillary Clinton has a likability problem that she has worked hard to correct. She is not running a campaign based on enevitability or a presumption of such. She has learned from her mistakes. Still, she will need the votes of independents to become the next President. Independents are looking and they are seeing a Party that seems more interested in stoking the fires of bigotry, anger and hatred than steering the ship of State to any greater future. Trump could care less. The cameras are pointed at him and that is all he is interested in.

Trump is going to be short-lived as a presidential candidate and his television career is over. I think you are right he will fade to obscurity now.

What he said about McCain is so over the top disgusting it strikes all Americans as such, as you also noted. Rather bizarre and very telling that John Kerry immediately came to McCain's defense but when Kerry was getting swiftboated McCain was silent.

Character reveals itself in the most trying moment. And lack thereof as well.

In fairness Mc Cain called the attack on Kerry as “dishonest and dishonorable” and told the White house to do the same.

McCain deplores anti-Kerry ad - politics NBC News

The thing is Jeb is trying to criticise Trump when his own brother did it twice first to McCain and then to Kerry.

It tells you how two faced the GOP when they say support the troops, but hey they will cut veteran budgets all day.


except that they didnt cut the veteran's budget.

Just close your eyes and pretend it didn't happen
U.S. Senate Republicans block veterans health bill on budget worry Reuters
 
John McCain will go down in the history books as one of the better US Senators of his time, a war hero, and an effective legislator. Donald Trump will likely be rich until the day he passes from this earth into whatever oblivion in the afterlife awaits him and those that bother to remember him will remember his failed presidential bid and what an ass he made of himself for a brief time in the Summer of 2015. Neither man will suffer any long term effects of Mr. Trump's moronic statements. The true damage of what Donald Trump said about war hero John McCain was to further reveal the true thoughts of the GOP rank and file.

This doesn't fade so easily. If John McCain were not such a distinguished Republican, one may easily chalk it up to his being "yesterday's news" and that failed candidates in the Genral usually enjoy no second act (see Mitt Romney and Al Gore for reference). The hard-right doesn't like McCain being a member of that "gang of eight" who sought to rise above politics and negotiate an immigration bill.

For a clue of why it is more than that, you can look at that bill and see one of it's other authors, Marco Rubio, suffers little in the way of hard right angst. So what is it about this episode that does so much damage? For the answer, consider Rubio. Rubio is a candidate for President whereas McCain is not this time around. Rubio still has the chance to thwart a presidential bid by Hillary Clinton so he cannot be cast asunder so quickly as McCain has been. And there inlies the problem. It isn't that what Trump says has any basis in reality. Any grown-up knows this is the case. Anyone who saw combat has taken heroic stances for their nation. Captured combat soldiers hold a special place of reverence for Americans of all political stripes. What Mr. Trump did was say something to get more TV cameras pointed in his direction. Ordinarily, such a brazen publicity grab would be greeted with cynnacism and ridicule. However, Trump still has the ability to cause the President some discomfort and peril for Clinton--the presumptive Democratic nominee. So, for the same reasons as Rubio, the rank and file suspend the counsel of the better angels of their nature and decide to applaud Trump because he can do some damage to the other side; maybe.

Republicans cannot pretend to just be "letting the process" play out when Donald Trump is topping polls. Nor can they deny they feel this way about McCain and Mexicans ("Likewise, tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border. The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world.").

Hillary Clinton has a likability problem that she has worked hard to correct. She is not running a campaign based on enevitability or a presumption of such. She has learned from her mistakes. Still, she will need the votes of independents to become the next President. Independents are looking and they are seeing a Party that seems more interested in stoking the fires of bigotry, anger and hatred than steering the ship of State to any greater future. Trump could care less. The cameras are pointed at him and that is all he is interested in.

Trump is going to be short-lived as a presidential candidate and his television career is over. I think you are right he will fade to obscurity now.

What he said about McCain is so over the top disgusting it strikes all Americans as such, as you also noted. Rather bizarre and very telling that John Kerry immediately came to McCain's defense but when Kerry was getting swiftboated McCain was silent.

Character reveals itself in the most trying moment. And lack thereof as well.

In fairness Mc Cain called the attack on Kerry as “dishonest and dishonorable” and told the White house to do the same.

McCain deplores anti-Kerry ad - politics NBC News

The thing is Jeb is trying to criticise Trump when his own brother did it twice first to McCain and then to Kerry.

It tells you how two faced the GOP when they say support the troops, but hey they will cut veteran budgets all day.


except that they didnt cut the veteran's budget.

Just close your eyes and pretend it didn't happen
U.S. Senate Republicans block veterans health bill on budget worry Reuters

pretend you know what you're talking about idiot
dems put poison pills in bills
and it was NOT "paid for" like Dems insisted it was

try again
 
She quit instead of being indicted....very Republican of her.
Indicted for what? Specifically.


EXACTLY!!!

libs are such idiots. so is this left-wing idiot saying (admitting?) the whole "indictment" was to get her to resign? Because if she had committed such a grievous offense(s) meriting criminal charges, then why wasn't she indicted whether she resigned or not?

The Alaska news papers no longer pursued it and the Republican AG shockingly lost interest when the press did.


only the "Alaska news" lost interest??

OR maybe they had nothing and you're a silly but typical left-wing idiot who thinks just making an accusation makes something true, engaging in laughable Palinphobia?

Palin (aka Sarah-cuda) who once said that the difference between Hockey Moms (like her) and pit bulls was lipstick resigned in disgrace because they had nothing on her.

Listen...you believe what you want to believe but at some point, you've got to stop lying to yourself. It's what grown ups do.

I, for one, would welcome her back with open arms to any GOP function she wishes to attend. Every second of exposure from her is a net positive for the Democrats and the center-left.

She is a moron.
Yes, but she made for respectable Eye Candy while she lasted...
wink_smile.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top