Ptsd And Weapons Possession

In Feb of 2013 a former Marine named Eddie Ray Routh murdered former Navy Seal Chris Kyle and another Veteran Chad Littlefield at a gun range in Texas. The motive was unclear but the attorneys for Routh will base their defense on PTSD. Former Marine Sgt. (wrong way) Tahmooressi ended up in Mexico with a trunk full of weapons. His defense ....PTSD. Wouldn't it be prudent to prevent PTSD patients from possessing deadly weapons until they are cleared by government psychiatrists?
Wrong, one must have reasonable grounds for claiming someone lose their rights due to mental illness. If you suspect someone report them and let the authorities decide what to do. In the US one does not have to justify the use of their rights, one must justify taking rights away. Further Psychiatrists do not decide if one loses their rights a Court does that. A Judge must rule you incompetent.


Wrong gunny. The ATF form asks if the applicant is currently undergoing treatment for mental illness. Crazy people are (rightfully) denied permission to purchase a firearm. There is no further judicial review. Now, if the government decides to confiscate weapons it is another issue.
Incorrect.

The 4473 asks nothing about currently receiving mental health treatment:

“Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution? (See Instructions for Question 11.f.)”

Only after someone has been afforded due process can an issue of mental health be a factor in determining whether or not one may be allowed possession of a firearm.
In Feb of 2013 a former Marine named Eddie Ray Routh murdered former Navy Seal Chris Kyle and another Veteran Chad Littlefield at a gun range in Texas. The motive was unclear but the attorneys for Routh will base their defense on PTSD. Former Marine Sgt. (wrong way) Tahmooressi ended up in Mexico with a trunk full of weapons. His defense ....PTSD. Wouldn't it be prudent to prevent PTSD patients from possessing deadly weapons until they are cleared by government psychiatrists?
Wrong, one must have reasonable grounds for claiming someone lose their rights due to mental illness. If you suspect someone report them and let the authorities decide what to do. In the US one does not have to justify the use of their rights, one must justify taking rights away. Further Psychiatrists do not decide if one loses their rights a Court does that. A Judge must rule you incompetent.


Wrong gunny. The ATF form asks if the applicant is currently undergoing treatment for mental illness. Crazy people are (rightfully) denied permission to purchase a firearm. There is no further judicial review. Now, if the government decides to confiscate weapons it is another issue.
Incorrect.

The 4473 asks nothing about currently receiving mental health treatment:

“Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective (which includes a determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that you are a danger to yourself or to others or are incompetent to manage your own affairs) OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution? (See Instructions for Question 11.f.)”

Only after someone has been afforded due process can an issue of mental health be a factor in determining whether or not one may be allowed possession of a firearm.


The word "adjudicated" has been broadened in a federal statute signed by the president to include "persons who were ordered to receive outpatient mental health treatment". In the case of the maniac who murdered 32 people in Va. Tech in 2007 he was ordered by a local court to receive outpatient mental health treatment instead of having a criminal record for stalking coeds at the university.
 
Here's the deal, about PTSD. It's sometimes used a cop-out when a member of the Military gets drunk and is arrested in a domestic disturbance. The requirements are so broad that a member of the Military doesn't even have to have been in combat. Cite PTSD and everything goes away. The other PTSD arena has to do with good old Uncle awarding a pension to those Vets. who claim to be so mentally incapacitated and prone to incoherent violence because of their time in the Military that they require compensation from the government. The symptoms of PTSD include violent outbursts and antisocial behavior. The question for society is whether we should allow persons with PTSD to "legally" purchase firearms while federal statutes prevent civilians from obtaining firearms for exhibiting the same behavior.
 
Here's the deal, about PTSD. It's sometimes used a cop-out when a member of the Military gets drunk and is arrested in a domestic disturbance. The requirements are so broad that a member of the Military doesn't even have to have been in combat. Cite PTSD and everything goes away. The other PTSD arena has to do with good old Uncle awarding a pension to those Vets. who claim to be so mentally incapacitated and prone to incoherent violence because of their time in the Military that they require compensation from the government. The symptoms of PTSD include violent outbursts and antisocial behavior. The question for society is whether we should allow persons with PTSD to "legally" purchase firearms while federal statutes prevent civilians from obtaining firearms for exhibiting the same behavior.
You are a liar. PTSD does not always include violence nor mayhem. Further there are no civilian statutes that remove 2nd amendment rights without a court order. By the way dumb ass Federal statutes apply to retired military and to veterans as well as active duty military. A lot of cops have PTSD as well. You are such a fucking liar.
 
Here's the deal, about PTSD. It's sometimes used a cop-out when a member of the Military gets drunk and is arrested in a domestic disturbance. The requirements are so broad that a member of the Military doesn't even have to have been in combat. Cite PTSD and everything goes away. The other PTSD arena has to do with good old Uncle awarding a pension to those Vets. who claim to be so mentally incapacitated and prone to incoherent violence because of their time in the Military that they require compensation from the government. The symptoms of PTSD include violent outbursts and antisocial behavior. The question for society is whether we should allow persons with PTSD to "legally" purchase firearms while federal statutes prevent civilians from obtaining firearms for exhibiting the same behavior.
Be so kind as to point out where in this definition of PTSD it states any of the crap you just spewed?

NIMH Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD

PTSD can cause many symptoms. These symptoms can be grouped into three categories:

1. Re-experiencing symptoms

  • Flashbacks—reliving the trauma over and over, including physical symptoms like a racing heart or sweating
  • Bad dreams
  • Frightening thoughts.
Re-experiencing symptoms may cause problems in a person’s everyday routine. They can start from the person’s own thoughts and feelings. Words, objects, or situations that are reminders of the event can also trigger re-experiencing.

2. Avoidance symptoms

  • Staying away from places, events, or objects that are reminders of the experience
  • Feeling emotionally numb
  • Feeling strong guilt, depression, or worry
  • Losing interest in activities that were enjoyable in the past
  • Having trouble remembering the dangerous event.
Things that remind a person of the traumatic event can trigger avoidance symptoms. These symptoms may cause a person to change his or her personal routine. For example, after a bad car accident, a person who usually drives may avoid driving or riding in a car.

3. Hyperarousal symptoms

  • Being easily startled
  • Feeling tense or “on edge”
  • Having difficulty sleeping, and/or having angry outbursts.
Hyperarousal symptoms are usually constant, instead of being triggered by things that remind one of the traumatic event. They can make the person feel stressed and angry. These symptoms may make it hard to do daily tasks, such as sleeping, eating, or concentrating.

It’s natural to have some of these symptoms after a dangerous event. Sometimes people have very serious symptoms that go away after a few weeks. This is called acute stress disorder, or ASD. When the symptoms last more than a few weeks and become an ongoing problem, they might be PTSD. Some people with PTSD don’t show any symptoms for weeks or months.
 
Almost every freaking person in the Country has experienced traumatic stress at some time in their lives and they don't whine about bad dreams and fast heartbeats. The good people who work in emergency rooms in big cities see more trauma in a month than the average post WW2 Soldier ever did. Modern kids see more realistic trauma courtesy of Hollywood than WW2 Soldiers ever dreamed of. Cops see it close up and in their faces during their careers but if they get drunk and beat up their wives they don't get to cite PTSD, they just lose their jobs and and if they are convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse they lose their 2nd Amendment right to purchase a gun in most states.
 
Almost every freaking person in the Country has experienced traumatic stress at some time in their lives and they don't whine about bad dreams and fast heartbeats. The good people who work in emergency rooms in big cities see more trauma in a month than the average post WW2 Soldier ever did. Modern kids see more realistic trauma courtesy of Hollywood than WW2 Soldiers ever dreamed of. Cops see it close up and in their faces during their careers but if they get drunk and beat up their wives they don't get to cite PTSD, they just lose their jobs and and if they are convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse they lose their 2nd Amendment right to purchase a gun in most states.
Actually a hell of a lot of cops have PTSD. Shall we disarm them too?

And to repeat for the slow and amazingly stupid.... It takes a Judge to remove your rights not a doctor.
 
I guess before I worry about something that is not broken. How many people, cops, military, Bosnians, whoever with PTSD get in trouble with firearms? Seems like it would be more than the general population but I honestly do not know. If it is not a higher percentage then we are doing ok.
 
I guess before I worry about something that is not broken. How many people, cops, military, Bosnians, whoever with PTSD get in trouble with firearms? Seems like it would be more than the general population but I honestly do not know. If it is not a higher percentage then we are doing ok.
There are few cases of PTSD related shootings. This is one nuts crusade that has no facts to back it up.
 
I guess before I worry about something that is not broken. How many people, cops, military, Bosnians, whoever with PTSD get in trouble with firearms? Seems like it would be more than the general population but I honestly do not know. If it is not a higher percentage then we are doing ok.
There are few cases of PTSD related shootings. This is one nuts crusade that has no facts to back it up.


Few cases? How many cases does it take to at least consider that PTSD patients should be on the same state name check list as civilian court ordered psychiatric counseling?
 
In Feb of 2013 a former Marine named Eddie Ray Routh murdered former Navy Seal Chris Kyle and another Veteran Chad Littlefield at a gun range in Texas. The motive was unclear but the attorneys for Routh will base their defense on PTSD. Former Marine Sgt. (wrong way) Tahmooressi ended up in Mexico with a trunk full of weapons. His defense ....PTSD. Wouldn't it be prudent to prevent PTSD patients from possessing deadly weapons until they are cleared by government psychiatrists?

No, it wouldn't be prudent. It would be a ridiculous over reaction.
 
Help me out.

Suffering from PTSD officially rightfully gets you some disability, correct?
And your point?

Well at some point if you are suffering PTSD you have said you have mental problems. I am sure there are tons of forms to get the disability from it and a few tests.

Can we just say anyone who is determined to be disabled due to PTSD is ineligible to own a gun? Heck, I'll give PTSD disability victims $1,000 more a year in exchange if that keeps whoever their lobbying group is happy. Lord knows the poor bastards deserve more.
Nope doesn't work that way. Once again for the slow and stupid, a JUDGE must rule you incompetent. Just because something disables you does not make you incompetent. I have delusional paranoia and recurring major depression am rated at 70 percent by VA and paid at the 100 percent rate. I can still own possess and carry firearms. And my shrink does not disagree. Nor my therapist.

We are talking about two different things. You can be arrested for lying about your mental condition on an ATF form. Surely everyone cares about crazy people buying firearms. The maniac who was responsible for the worst school shooting in history wasn't a Vet but he slipped through the system and was able to purchase firearms even though he was insane because privacy issues about mental illness trumped the safety of citizens. The loophole has been corrected in Virginia and court ordered psychiatric counseling shows up in the instant name check. You can prevent criminals and mental patients from purchasing firearms by the instant name check but it does take a court order to confiscate firearms.

PTSD does not equate to crazy.
 
Help me out.

Suffering from PTSD officially rightfully gets you some disability, correct?
And your point?

Well at some point if you are suffering PTSD you have said you have mental problems. I am sure there are tons of forms to get the disability from it and a few tests.

Can we just say anyone who is determined to be disabled due to PTSD is ineligible to own a gun? Heck, I'll give PTSD disability victims $1,000 more a year in exchange if that keeps whoever their lobbying group is happy. Lord knows the poor bastards deserve more.
Nope doesn't work that way. Once again for the slow and stupid, a JUDGE must rule you incompetent. Just because something disables you does not make you incompetent. I have delusional paranoia and recurring major depression am rated at 70 percent by VA and paid at the 100 percent rate. I can still own possess and carry firearms. And my shrink does not disagree. Nor my therapist.

We are talking about two different things. You can be arrested for lying about your mental condition on an ATF form. Surely everyone cares about crazy people buying firearms. The maniac who was responsible for the worst school shooting in history wasn't a Vet but he slipped through the system and was able to purchase firearms even though he was insane because privacy issues about mental illness trumped the safety of citizens. The loophole has been corrected in Virginia and court ordered psychiatric counseling shows up in the instant name check. You can prevent criminals and mental patients from purchasing firearms by the instant name check but it does take a court order to confiscate firearms.

PTSD does not equate to crazy.

Aren't people declared disabled because of it?

What does PTSD usually do to folks?
 
Ruling by Edict Obama Issues Two New Anti-Gun Executive Orders
Ruling by Edict: Obama Issues Two New Anti-Gun Executive Orders
January 3, 2014 By Greg Campbell

http://www.tpnn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Obama.jpg
The Obama Administration appears to be testing the waters of public opinion as they announced two new executive orders concerning gun control on Friday. Though this administration has remained hostile to the issue of gun rights, the Obama Administration has maintained a hands-off approach for nearly a year as the fever-pitch for increased gun control laws has nationally faded from public discussion.

However, with the announcement of the two new executive orders, President Obama may be signaling that he’s willing to act unilaterally and, perhaps, unconstitutionally to create and implement gun control policies.

The Obama Administration announced the new executive orders that would allow the federal database access to mental health records by offering an exemption to existing privacy laws that protect patient privacy. Further, the executive orders “clarify” that citizens involuntarily committed to inpatient and outpatient facilities can be prohibited from firearm ownership.

Of course, such provisions are likely to rile gun rights advocates who note that the Second Amendment offers no such allowances, but only states that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.”

The White House touted the results of President Obama’s executive actions concerning gun rights, 23 edicts issued last year, claiming that federal agencies have provided 1.2 million records identifying people who are unsuitable for gun ownership.

The Obama Administration claims that the new executive edicts will not go into effect until after sixty days of comments and discussion that begins next Tuesday, however the Obama Administration’s record for transparency has been increasingly poor in recent years.

The new rule concerning the circumvention of privacy laws will provide “an express permission to submit to the background check system the limited information necessary to help keep guns out of potentially dangerous hands,” the White House said.

However, with a two-prong attack on gun rights for those with perceived mental issues, many fear that new rules targeting those with mental health issues might serve as a slippery slope as such rules open the door for the federal government to decide who is mentally fit enough to open a firearm.

Further, with the loosening of privacy practices and the thickening of scrutiny for those who have been committed to receive help, some citizens might be hesitant to seek short-term mental health help if there is a danger of having their Second Amendment rights revoked.

The White House’s statement aimed to assuage such concerns by claiming, “The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm. Furthermore, nothing in the proposed rule would require reporting on general mental health visits or other routine mental health care, or would exempt providers solely performing these treatment services from existing privacy rules.”

However, several high-profile instances have occurred in recent years in states with strict gun control oversight where law-abiding citizens have been stripped of their rights for a wide-range of mild psychological issues.




So if ANY "health care professional" asks you any questions about owning guns...present THIS to them to sign first...watch them squirm.
Check it out;
http://www.2ampd.net/Articles/horn2/Firearms Malpractice Form.pdf
 
And your point?

Well at some point if you are suffering PTSD you have said you have mental problems. I am sure there are tons of forms to get the disability from it and a few tests.

Can we just say anyone who is determined to be disabled due to PTSD is ineligible to own a gun? Heck, I'll give PTSD disability victims $1,000 more a year in exchange if that keeps whoever their lobbying group is happy. Lord knows the poor bastards deserve more.
Nope doesn't work that way. Once again for the slow and stupid, a JUDGE must rule you incompetent. Just because something disables you does not make you incompetent. I have delusional paranoia and recurring major depression am rated at 70 percent by VA and paid at the 100 percent rate. I can still own possess and carry firearms. And my shrink does not disagree. Nor my therapist.

We are talking about two different things. You can be arrested for lying about your mental condition on an ATF form. Surely everyone cares about crazy people buying firearms. The maniac who was responsible for the worst school shooting in history wasn't a Vet but he slipped through the system and was able to purchase firearms even though he was insane because privacy issues about mental illness trumped the safety of citizens. The loophole has been corrected in Virginia and court ordered psychiatric counseling shows up in the instant name check. You can prevent criminals and mental patients from purchasing firearms by the instant name check but it does take a court order to confiscate firearms.

PTSD does not equate to crazy.

Aren't people declared disabled because of it?

What does PTSD usually do to folks?

It can be all kinds of things. Depression, difficulty concentrating, difficulty in dealing with day to day living, nightmares, etc. It can be mild or severe. It is not a one size fits all kind of thing. It does not mean someone is a danger to themselves or others. Neither does having a disability mean you are a danger.
 
Well at some point if you are suffering PTSD you have said you have mental problems. I am sure there are tons of forms to get the disability from it and a few tests.

Can we just say anyone who is determined to be disabled due to PTSD is ineligible to own a gun? Heck, I'll give PTSD disability victims $1,000 more a year in exchange if that keeps whoever their lobbying group is happy. Lord knows the poor bastards deserve more.
Nope doesn't work that way. Once again for the slow and stupid, a JUDGE must rule you incompetent. Just because something disables you does not make you incompetent. I have delusional paranoia and recurring major depression am rated at 70 percent by VA and paid at the 100 percent rate. I can still own possess and carry firearms. And my shrink does not disagree. Nor my therapist.

We are talking about two different things. You can be arrested for lying about your mental condition on an ATF form. Surely everyone cares about crazy people buying firearms. The maniac who was responsible for the worst school shooting in history wasn't a Vet but he slipped through the system and was able to purchase firearms even though he was insane because privacy issues about mental illness trumped the safety of citizens. The loophole has been corrected in Virginia and court ordered psychiatric counseling shows up in the instant name check. You can prevent criminals and mental patients from purchasing firearms by the instant name check but it does take a court order to confiscate firearms.

PTSD does not equate to crazy.

Aren't people declared disabled because of it?

What does PTSD usually do to folks?

It can be all kinds of things. Depression, difficulty concentrating, difficulty in dealing with day to day living, nightmares, etc. It can be mild or severe. It is not a one size fits all kind of thing. It does not mean someone is a danger to themselves or others. Neither does having a disability mean you are a danger.

True.

So if one has PTSD bad enough to be unable to work and get disability from it, what typically is going on that they can't haul mattresses around or do some Joomla website work?
 
Here's the deal, about PTSD. It's sometimes used a cop-out when a member of the Military gets drunk and is arrested in a domestic disturbance. The requirements are so broad that a member of the Military doesn't even have to have been in combat. Cite PTSD and everything goes away. The other PTSD arena has to do with good old Uncle awarding a pension to those Vets. who claim to be so mentally incapacitated and prone to incoherent violence because of their time in the Military that they require compensation from the government. The symptoms of PTSD include violent outbursts and antisocial behavior. The question for society is whether we should allow persons with PTSD to "legally" purchase firearms while federal statutes prevent civilians from obtaining firearms for exhibiting the same behavior.
You are a liar. PTSD does not always include violence nor mayhem. Further there are no civilian statutes that remove 2nd amendment rights without a court order. By the way dumb ass Federal statutes apply to retired military and to veterans as well as active duty military. A lot of cops have PTSD as well. You are such a fucking liar.

There you go again confusing legitimate restrictions on the 2nd amendment with a mind numbing inaccurate view of the judicial system. Sure, federal statutes apply to retired Military as well as active duty Military and every other freaking citizen. Active Military personnel, retired Military, ass hole kids, stupid hippies, and metrosexual pop-culture elites are automatically restricted from purchasing a firearm if they are convicted of a crime in most states and if they cop a plea to "psychiatric counseling" to avoid conviction they are restricted from purchasing a firearm in most states. Active and retired Military just like the rest of us can have their weapons confiscated (without a court order) if they are arrested in a domestic disturbance in most states. Active and retired Military are both restricted from obtaining a firearm in most states if they are under court ordered psychiatric counseling for civilian related violations from DUI to substance abuse to domestic abuse. The glitch in the law is that the disability disorder of PTSD isn't usually included in the federal and state name check for purchasing a firearm even though it is a mental disorder requiring treatment. Based on two high profile PTSD related incidents I think the PTSD loophole should be closed.
 
In Feb of 2013 a former Marine named Eddie Ray Routh murdered former Navy Seal Chris Kyle and another Veteran Chad Littlefield at a gun range in Texas. The motive was unclear but the attorneys for Routh will base their defense on PTSD. Former Marine Sgt. (wrong way) Tahmooressi ended up in Mexico with a trunk full of weapons. His defense ....PTSD. Wouldn't it be prudent to prevent PTSD patients from possessing deadly weapons until they are cleared by government psychiatrists?

I'm crazy as a fruit house bat and I have a shit load of weapons.
 
In Feb of 2013 a former Marine named Eddie Ray Routh murdered former Navy Seal Chris Kyle and another Veteran Chad Littlefield at a gun range in Texas. The motive was unclear but the attorneys for Routh will base their defense on PTSD. Former Marine Sgt. (wrong way) Tahmooressi ended up in Mexico with a trunk full of weapons. His defense ....PTSD. Wouldn't it be prudent to prevent PTSD patients from possessing deadly weapons until they are cleared by government psychiatrists?

I'm crazy as a fruit house bat and I have a shit load of weapons.[/QUO

Maybe someone who admits to being "crazy as a fruit house bat" is a crazy confessor to criminal possession of illegal weapons or if he has a snoot full of "jack" and wants to fight. Either way I rest my case.
 
Almost every freaking person in the Country has experienced traumatic stress at some time in their lives and they don't whine about bad dreams and fast heartbeats. The good people who work in emergency rooms in big cities see more trauma in a month than the average post WW2 Soldier ever did. Modern kids see more realistic trauma courtesy of Hollywood than WW2 Soldiers ever dreamed of. Cops see it close up and in their faces during their careers but if they get drunk and beat up their wives they don't get to cite PTSD, they just lose their jobs and and if they are convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse they lose their 2nd Amendment right to purchase a gun in most states.
Actually a hell of a lot of cops have PTSD. Shall we disarm them too?

And to repeat for the slow and amazingly stupid.... It takes a Judge to remove your rights not a doctor.


I seriously doubt that Police Departments hire disabled Military PTSD patients. Almost everybody in the state and local emergency related field has seen more carnage in their careers than ordinary Soldiers and Marines have seen in their one year tour in harms way in the last three decades. There is no PTSD compensation for Police and emergency personnel. However if a Police officer in most states is convicted of domestic abuse he (or she) would be restricted to an area where they would not carry or possess a firearm if they were not fired outright.
 

Forum List

Back
Top