CaféAuLait
This Space for Rent
CaféAuLait;1081792 said:The argument is what IS marriage. And the States are free to define it as between a MAN and a WOMAN. Which is what California has done. Your Court case does not apply to Homosexuals. In fact the weight of History is against your claim. It has been understood and has been codified in LAW to mean between a man and a woman. Your court case establishes that race can not disregard that. It does NOT change the basic foundation of what a Marriage is understood to be.
Or next, since all men have a right to marriage, why can not a man Marry a sheep? Using your law the only thing stopping that is LAWS. If all men have a right to marriage no matter what, then since the age of consent in some States is 14 the a 50 year old can marry any 14 year old he wants. Through out the Country. Why, cause one state says 14 is the age of consent and the other 49 would be refusing to honor that using your logic and that of Luissiana.
And those men you speak wanting to be with young children? Are already pushing for such laws..
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization in the United States that advocates the liberalisation of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males - resolving to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships". NAMBLA also calls for "the adoption of laws that both protect children from unwanted sexual experiences and at the same time leave them free to determine the content of their own sexual experiences."
North American Man/Boy Love Association - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So what, why if we legalize gay marriage would we then have to listen to Nambla?
Pedophiles and NAMBLA (more pedophiles) are waiting to pounce they, are hoping that the ban on homosexual marriage is found unconstitutional Why? Because then the age of consent will be called discrimination due to their perverted sexual predilection.
They will fight and argue that is a child is an adult when being charged with murder at 11 and are able to contract to have medical procedures ( abortions) Since a child can be charged as an adult at 11 their argument if society can charge them as adults for crime and medical procedures-- they they can also consent and or make an adult decision to have sexual relations with a NAMBLA freak.
It is all about sexual predilection with NAMBLA and they will fight to have themselves as being seen as discriminated against because of their sexual perverted prowess. They have been billing themselves as having the same rights as those who do not conform to society’s norms for years now. This will give them a stepping stone.
Last edited: