danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #141
No, it isn't. The first clause is the legislative Intent and Purpose. It is in Writing.One clause:It is not about natural rights; it is about the security of a free State. It says so in the first clause.
"A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state"
...is wholly dependent on the second clause.
The second clause can stand on its own.
It's not about a militia or a free state. It is SOLELY about Congressional Power. It still does not protect individual natural rights. It only limits Congress. And, as you said, leaves the power to states to protect natural rights.
Admit that or I have nothing more to say to you. Even the most one-sided partisan hack will admit that a proper reading of the 2nd Amendment demonstrates an intent to limit the power of Congress, regardless of the purpose.
The first clause is the end, the second clause is the means.