Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Annie, Dec 13, 2007.
From another site:
Do not baffle the idiots with facts. The faithful worship at the feet of their prophet Al Gore and his UN buddies. Facts are unimportant.
So it might be worse than predicted, eh?
To a pessimist, perhaps.
Pessimists are almost always wrong, though. Which, of course, makes their pessimism even deeper. It's kind of like a drug that way, yes?
Pessimists are almost always wrong? So I take it we shouldn't be worried about the lack of water in Georgia, Iran who may or may not be getting nukes, Pakistani instability, etc, etc? After all why think things might not pan out well? Those type of thoughts are "almost always wrong", right?
Absurd, really. And no, its nothing like a drug.
Missed the entire fucking point. The models are so flawed they can not predict shit. Meaning the data put in them is WRONG, you stupid genius you. They do not WORK.
It is simple really. If the model can predict the future it should be able to accurately recreate what has already happened, since we HAVE that data. It can not do that. Meaning future predictions do not pan out at ALL. The models are not even educated guesses, they are wild ass guesses with no basis in fact.
The point is we do NOT know enough to predict the future. We do not have enough data or understanding of how things work, we can not get models to recreate what we KNOW happened. The models are useless. The science is to poor to make the predictions.
Thus why I suggest we LEARN what we need to know rather then make ignorant worthless wild guesses and use them to damage economies for no reason other then to delude ourselves into thinking we have power and knowledge we do NOT have.
Umm, no. Thats not what it means. It means the calculations they are making are wrong.
Well this is a wild assumption based on the article. Are educated guesses sometimes wrong RGS? If so then how do you know these are "wild ass guesses with no basis in fact" as opposed to educated guesses? Oh wait, its convenient for you to think that.
Actually, we do have all that data and scientific research to back it up, rgs.
Are we now to believe your ignorant rants and completely disproven statements to guide us in our efforts to save our planet, if only for a few more years?
God told us to protect our environment. Are you telling us that God was wrong?
LOL, usual games from Larkinn. Hey stupid, if ALL the models are wrong, all are using the wrong calculations, those calculations deviced and determined by YOUR 42 percent of the Scientific community, what the hell does that tell you about the dooms day predictions? What dose that tell you about the claims they KNOW what is causing the problem? Now I know it may hurt you, but engage the lump of coal in your head and reason it out, even you can do it.
Kinda like all the "Shock and Awe" "We'll be met with Flowers" "Slam Duck" and all that other shit you like to proclaim and defend?
Even I can figure all that out!!!!!!!!!!!
You never figured out the Cheerleaders in High School, did you?
Separate names with a comma.