jon_forward
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #101
we are talking about life here..not a mound of play dough...get a clue..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally posted by jon_forward
cant come up with one by yourself???? sucks to be on the losing team dont it....
Originally posted by Avatar4321
Actually biological and Medical science dicates that if cells are dividing its alive. Only living things have cells that divide.
Might be able to argue about whether its human or not, but whether its alive? come on.
Originally posted by Bullypulpit
It is living matter, but does it constitute a living being? In a word...No. Nor is there argument as to whether the blastocyst is a human...It is not.
Originally posted by jimnyc
And legislation says it is. I guess you are wrong again.
Originally posted by jimnyc
And legislation says it is. I guess you are wrong again.
Originally posted by Bullypulpit
The legislation is wrong. We agree to disagree.
I have no idea why you insist on putting words in the mouths of others. There is nothing in this law which in any way suggests that. The words are pretty clear that they are excepting abortion and medical treatments which result in harm to a fetus. In fact, this law excepts ANYTHING a mother could do to her unborn fetus- including fetal alcohol poisoning and drug related miscarriages.Originally posted by Bullypulpit
I know you aren't, but the sub rosa political agenda is, ultimately, about retricting a woman's right to choice.