Primer on Glass-Steagall

Procrustes Stretched

And you say, "Oh my God, am I here all alone?"
Dec 1, 2008
60,572
7,608
1,840
Positively 4th Street
Primer on Glass-Steagall

Versions of things based on the same facts? That's life, but here is an interesting article it is tough to argue against

So did that cause the financial crisis?

Not exactly! In a popular retelling (see for example this version from Aaron Sorkin’s HBO show “Newsroom”), it was the repeal of Glass-Steagall that unleashed the era of Wall Street risk-taking and the 2008 global financial crisis.

...


There’s no question that aggressive risk-taking by financial firms was a key driver of the crisis. But the arguments that Glass-Steagall’s repeal — that is, the commingling of investment banking and commercial banking within the same firm — was a major cause are tenuous.

...

It is true that two of the biggest bailout recipients were mega-banks with both commercial and investment banking arms, Citigroup and Bank of America. And while JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo weathered the crisis relatively well, they also accepted bailouts at the insistence of the Treasury and Federal Reserve in 2008.

...

In other words, refinement of the Volcker Rule is a pathway for advocates of tougher limitations on banks’ risk-taking who do not want to break them up entirely
.​

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/u...he-debate.html?contentCollection=weekendreads
 
Primer on Glass-Steagall

Versions of things based on the same facts? That's life, but here is an interesting article it is tough to argue against

So did that cause the financial crisis?

Not exactly! In a popular retelling (see for example this version from Aaron Sorkin’s HBO show “Newsroom”), it was the repeal of Glass-Steagall that unleashed the era of Wall Street risk-taking and the 2008 global financial crisis.

...


There’s no question that aggressive risk-taking by financial firms was a key driver of the crisis. But the arguments that Glass-Steagall’s repeal — that is, the commingling of investment banking and commercial banking within the same firm — was a major cause are tenuous.

...

It is true that two of the biggest bailout recipients were mega-banks with both commercial and investment banking arms, Citigroup and Bank of America. And while JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo weathered the crisis relatively well, they also accepted bailouts at the insistence of the Treasury and Federal Reserve in 2008.

...

In other words, refinement of the Volcker Rule is a pathway for advocates of tougher limitations on banks’ risk-taking who do not want to break them up entirely
.​

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/u...he-debate.html?contentCollection=weekendreads

true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all over it anyway since they, in pure and perfect ignorance, regard regulation as magical, and thus cant grasp the concept that libsoviet regulation can do far more harm than good.
 
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all...
please Special Ed. stop misrepresenting what the article is about.
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all over it anyway since they, in pure and perfect ignorance, regard regulation as magical, and thus cant grasp the concept that libsoviet regulation can do far more harm than good.
 
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all...
please Special Ed. stop misrepresenting what the article is about.
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all over it anyway since they, in pure and perfect ignorance, regard regulation as magical, and thus cant grasp the concept that libsoviet regulation can do far more harm than good.
pretty please Special Ed, stop misrepresenting what the article is about.
 
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all...
please Special Ed. stop misrepresenting what the article is about.
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all over it anyway since they, in pure and perfect ignorance, regard regulation as magical, and thus cant grasp the concept that libsoviet regulation can do far more harm than good.
pretty please Special Ed, stop misrepresenting what the article is about.
true enough, there was never any evidence that repeal of Glass caused the housing collapse but liberals jumped all over it anyway since they, in pure and perfect ignorance, regard regulation as magical, and thus cant grasp the concept that libsoviet regulation can do far more harm than good.
 

Forum List

Back
Top