Prima Facie evidence

Astrostar

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2017
2,938
3,841
1,940
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.
 
They are preparing a response for something they havent read yet?
What a shit show. What a bunch of useless, pathetic hacks.

No, they're preparing a response to receiving a redacted report. Read the article.

I get a quarter every time I post the letter R.
 
It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public.

Sorry, WRONG AGAIN. No cookie for you. If it was so simple, then why is Mueller's team themselves pouring over all the material to determine what gets redacted?

What you are claiming would be like (just for analogy's sake) if you witnessed a bad traffic accident, and in order to ascertain your role if any, they did a thorough, complete investigation of your life, your work history, credit history, hobbies, address, medical, psychological, financial, legal, educational, criminal, friends and family records. Then in the end, a judge said that having been cleared of wrongdoing yourself, the traffic court, judges, attorneys, public and media didn't need to see all of that personal detail and expose you to widespread leakage of all the unrelated personal information on you to the entire public at large, and I came along and demanded: 'Yes! Just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the public! Quit trying to hide it!'

That is essentially what you are arguing for. Democrats can prepare any argument they want. They will NEVER see the FULL, unredacted report. Their demand is tantamount to essentially accusing the AG of criminal conspiracy with absolutely no evidence, then demanding something he can never legally give them as they always do as a grounds of dropping their charges.

In America: INNOCENT until proven guilty.

In the Court of the Fascist Democrats: We accuse you of guilt! Now PROVE your innocence! :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
They are preparing a response for something they havent read yet?
What a shit show. What a bunch of useless, pathetic hacks.
They have a habit of doing that. Facts, schmacks, what do they matter! Lol
 
Maybe one day we will find out what Barr gets out of sacrificing his reputation for Trump's sake.
 
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.
So simple, you're an idiot. Trump won again.
 
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.

"It's so simple for Trump. Just do something that isn't his job and violates the law so we can have what we want. Why's he being stupid and complicating things by denying us our demands du jour?!"

Is there some part of "the law requires redaction" that's just too complicated for you to get, or is it just that you don't want to hear that the world doesn't conform to your ignorant view of how things work?
 
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.

"It's so simple for Trump. Just do something that isn't his job and violates the law so we can have what we want. Why's he being stupid and complicating things by denying us our demands du jour?!"

Is there some part of "the law requires redaction" that's just too complicated for you to get, or is it just that you don't want to hear that the world doesn't conform to your ignorant view of how things work?
There is no way Mueller would write a report that takes this long to redact. There is certainly a summary in the report that would require no redaction at all. There can be only one explanation for this delay. I have no doubt there is a fight going on between Mueller and Trump's lawyers. Where Barr stands on all that will be made abundantly clear when this thing comes out 400 pages of black ink.
 
Do you seriously think no one has anything else on their calendar, just this?
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.

"It's so simple for Trump. Just do something that isn't his job and violates the law so we can have what we want. Why's he being stupid and complicating things by denying us our demands du jour?!"

Is there some part of "the law requires redaction" that's just too complicated for you to get, or is it just that you don't want to hear that the world doesn't conform to your ignorant view of how things work?
There is no way Mueller would write a report that takes this long to redact. There is certainly a summary in the report that would require no redaction at all. There can be only one explanation for this delay. I have no doubt there is a fight going on between Mueller and Trump's lawyers. Where Barr stands on all that will be made abundantly clear when this thing comes out 400 pages of black ink.
 
Democrats prepare their response to Barr's redacted report - CNNPolitics

It's so simple for Trump; just release the full unredacted Mueller report to the Congress AND the public. He says it amounts to "total vindication, no colusion, no obstruction." Who cares what the AG says. He is a Trump appointee hired to protect Trump; something that Sessions failed to do, in Trump's eyes.

So, why not release it and take advantage of the political embarrassment it would lay at the feet of Democrats and "fake news?" Just think of the political capital! Trump could talk about it every day and especially at his rallies. Look at this, how wrong the Dems and "fake news" were. Would it not give him oodles and oodles of political capital.

Or, is there something in the report that is damaging politically and/or legally that Trump wants to hide? It looks like we have prima facie evidence of that, his unwillingness to release the report to the public.

"It's so simple for Trump. Just do something that isn't his job and violates the law so we can have what we want. Why's he being stupid and complicating things by denying us our demands du jour?!"

Is there some part of "the law requires redaction" that's just too complicated for you to get, or is it just that you don't want to hear that the world doesn't conform to your ignorant view of how things work?
There is no way Mueller would write a report that takes this long to redact. There is certainly a summary in the report that would require no redaction at all. There can be only one explanation for this delay. I have no doubt there is a fight going on between Mueller and Trump's lawyers. Where Barr stands on all that will be made abundantly clear when this thing comes out 400 pages of black ink.
Are you Mueller's mother that you know him so well that you know what kind of report he writes?

Wow, you have it bad. You actually don't care if Trump isn't guilty. You just want to punish him. All for winning an election.

Please spare Me your forthcoming diatribe about criminal conduct and how he is ruining America and an embarrassment to America.

Being against everything you stand for and believe in is NOT a crime, nor is it ruining America and the only people he is embarrassing is the left. Given they have zero decency, I don't hold them as credible authorities on what is embarrassing.
 
They are preparing a response for something they havent read yet?
And yet the Rube Herd parrots Trump's claims about the report every day, even though TRUMP hasn't read it!

How DO you stand the stench of your own hypocrisy?
 
Do you seriously think no one has anything else on their calendar, just this?
We've heard nothing but lame excuses since Mueller released his report while it gets to be read and censored by the very people Mueller investigated. Barr was nominated for one purpose and he is acting exactly how you would expect if he was protecting the president. This will not be an honest release.
 

Forum List

Back
Top