President's action to effect subsidized, Florida sugar cartel/s

Dot Com

Nullius in verba
Feb 15, 2011
52,842
7,882
1,830
Fairfax, NoVA
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
 
sugar is not the only industry that is profiting from citizens of this great nation having to subsidize everglade-destroying, Big Ag.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...

our proud African American President

could you be any more Politically Correct?.....
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...

We need to get rid of the sugar subsidies/quotas and the ethanol mandate.
Then we can kill the rest of the "green energy" subsidies and mandates.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing. I would not include sugar production as one of the necessary foodstuffs to subsidize.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing. I would not include sugar production as one of the necessary foodstuffs to subsidize.

Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing.

We produce mountains of food in excess of our needs.
Food is one thing we don't need to subsidize.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing. I would not include sugar production as one of the necessary foodstuffs to subsidize.

Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing.

We produce mountains of food in excess of our needs.
Food is one thing we don't need to subsidize.
With subsidies, we produce food in excess of our needs.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing. I would not include sugar production as one of the necessary foodstuffs to subsidize.

Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing.

We produce mountains of food in excess of our needs.
Food is one thing we don't need to subsidize.
With subsidies, we produce food in excess of our needs.

Without subsidies, we'd do the same.
 
Subsidized sugar may have to compete in the open market (conservative mantra) now that our proud African American President has worked behind the scenes for the last year to normalize relations w/ the island nation of Cuba.

REAL conservatives SHOULD be against subsidies UNLESS they're hacks :thup:

Discuss...
Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing. I would not include sugar production as one of the necessary foodstuffs to subsidize.

Since the food supply is a national security issue, some subsidies, to ensure a sufficient food production capablilty for the U.S. to be self-sustaining, is a good and necessary thing.

We produce mountains of food in excess of our needs.
Food is one thing we don't need to subsidize.
With subsidies, we produce food in excess of our needs.

Without subsidies, we'd do the same.
Quite likely. I was being a little flippant. But the actual point is that due to the national security importance, the door at least should remain open for subsidizing staple foods (regardless of whether or not they're necessary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top