President Trump’s First 100 Days by Scott 'Dilbert' Adams

[Weatherman2020]

The supreme court was filled in a crooked manner.
No victory there.

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

Just wait for Ginsberg's replacement. Grand Wizard of the KKK will fill her position you know.

 

[g5000]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

Classic sour grapes. Just classic. Right out of Aesop.

Trump promised all kinds of accomplishments in his first 100 days. He bragged and bragged and bragged about all the great, important, terrific things he was going to do.

And now he's reneged on almost all of them, and you just sit there and take it as he says, "Those grapes are probably sour anyway."

He's counting on you goldfish and your short term memories to forget his colossal failure to keep his promises.

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.

The bolding was by Trump.

Read Trump's 100 day MAGA plan. He has failed to achieve the vast majority of his contract.

16 of the 18 listed were completed, dufus.

O'rly?

Show me the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act.

Show me the End the Offshoring Act.

Show me the American Energy and Infrastructure Act.

Show me the School Choice and Education Opportunity Act.

Show me the Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Show me the Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act.

Show me the End Illegal Immigration Act.

Show me the Restoring Community Safety Act.

Show me the Restoring National Security Act.

Show me the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act.

"I will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator." Nope. Didn't happen.

Oh hum.

Trump to Order Oil Drilling Study Off California Coast, Sources Say

Trump signs executive order on H1B visa review — The Indian Panorama

Federal judge blocks Trump order to restrict funding for ‘sanctuary cities’

Trump, Sessions to Target MS-13 Gang and Illegal Immigration

https://www.usnews.com/news/educati...tion-department-to-study-government-overreach

As Trump Readies Sweeping Tax Reform, School Choice Experts Argue Merits of Federal Tax Credit Scholarships

Shall we continue?

Not one of those is a link to the legislation I asked for which Trump promised in his first 100 days.

So, yeah. Keep showing us how willfully blind and stupid you are. Go right ahead.

Let's try again, shall we?

Show me the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act.

Show me the End the Offshoring Act.

Show me the American Energy and Infrastructure Act.

Show me the School Choice and Education Opportunity Act.

Show me the Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Show me the Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act.

Show me the End Illegal Immigration Act.

Show me the Restoring Community Safety Act.

Show me the Restoring National Security Act.

Show me the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act.

 

[IResist]

"Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance."

Even though he hated when Obama did it.

"Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way."

You know who else was qualified? Merrick Garland. He was a casualty of playing politics.

If international relations are better, Sweden, Australia and Germany have all been bewildered by how he has acted.

As far as putting economics above the environment and justifying that, we are already the richest country in the world. If one of the roles of the federal government is to protect people, then that includes regulations to insure people breathe clean air and corporations don't pollute.

Trump being slow to fill a lot of positions may not impact my life, but he isn't doing his job either like he should be.

Also, Nunes even said during his press conference that Obama wiretapping Trump did not happen.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

Classic sour grapes. Just classic. Right out of Aesop.

Trump promised all kinds of accomplishments in his first 100 days. He bragged and bragged and bragged about all the great, important, terrific things he was going to do.

And now he's reneged on almost all of them, and you just sit there and take it as he says, "Those grapes are probably sour anyway."

He's counting on you goldfish and your short term memories to forget his colossal failure to keep his promises.

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.

The bolding was by Trump.

Read Trump's 100 day MAGA plan. He has failed to achieve the vast majority of his contract.

16 of the 18 listed were completed, dufus.

O'rly?

Show me the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act.

Show me the End the Offshoring Act.

Show me the American Energy and Infrastructure Act.

Show me the School Choice and Education Opportunity Act.

Show me the Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Show me the Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act.

Show me the End Illegal Immigration Act.

Show me the Restoring Community Safety Act.

Show me the Restoring National Security Act.

Show me the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act.

"I will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator." Nope. Didn't happen.

Oh hum.

Trump to Order Oil Drilling Study Off California Coast, Sources Say

Trump signs executive order on H1B visa review — The Indian Panorama

Federal judge blocks Trump order to restrict funding for ‘sanctuary cities’

Trump, Sessions to Target MS-13 Gang and Illegal Immigration

https://www.usnews.com/news/educati...tion-department-to-study-government-overreach

As Trump Readies Sweeping Tax Reform, School Choice Experts Argue Merits of Federal Tax Credit Scholarships

Shall we continue?

Just like I said...ordering people to study things is not a victory and the rest being blocked by judges everywhere isn't a victory either unless studing is winning. And not passing is also a win, white priveledge.

 

[g5000]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

He's right that it's essentially useless, however it's been applied to several past President's. Sure, probably a fabricated media thing just like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day are made up to sell more gift cards.

Still, no one complained when it was applied to Clinton, Bush or Obama, so why the conniption now?

The left are mad at Trump because "he has not done what he said he would do".

Nope. You are trying to claim the first 100 days don't matter. You are parroting what Trump is saying now.

And now you are having your face rubbed in what Trump said before the election about the first 100 days and all the great things he said he would get done.

No one is mad. We are laughing at you just sitting there, being cuckholded by the naked Emperor.

And you just sit there and take it.

Just as you'll sit there and take it as he runs up the national debt and healthcare costs to unprecedented levels.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

He's right that it's essentially useless, however it's been applied to several past President's. Sure, probably a fabricated media thing just like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day are made up to sell more gift cards.

Still, no one complained when it was applied to Clinton, Bush or Obama, so why the conniption now?

The left are mad at Trump because "he has not done what he said he would do".

Nope. You are trying to claim the first 100 days don't matter. You are parroting what Trump is saying now.

And now you are having your face rubbed in what Trump said before the election about the first 100 days and all the great things he said he would get done.

No one is mad. We are laughing at you just sitting there, being cuckholded by the naked Emperor.

And you just sit there and take it.

Just as you'll sit there and take it as he runs up the national debt and healthcare costs to unprecedented levels.

Obviously you can't read the OP. Don't feel bad, most leftists are uneducated too.

 

[boilermaker55]

Bigoted fools like you will revel in that, we know.
But watch out when it comes back and shits in your mouth. Like most everything does.

The supreme court was filled in a crooked manner.
No victory there.

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

Just wait for Ginsberg's replacement. Grand Wizard of the KKK will fill her position you know.

 

[Weatherman2020]

"Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance."

Even though he hated when Obama did it.

"Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way."

You know who else was qualified? Merrick Garland. He was a casualty of playing politics.

If international relations are better, Sweden, Australia and Germany have all been bewildered by how he has acted.

As far as putting economics above the environment and justifying that, we are already the richest country in the world. If one of the roles of the federal government is to protect people, then that includes regulations to insure people breathe clean air and corporations don't pollute.

Trump being slow to fill a lot of positions may not impact my life, but he isn't doing his job either like he should be.

Also, Nunes even said during his press conference that Obama wiretapping Trump did not happen.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Razmuffin and Horse Galloping Polls,,,,both at Trump approval at 85% for first 100 days

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bigoted fools like you will revel in that, we know.
But watch out when it comes back and shits in your mouth. Like most everything does.

The supreme court was filled in a crooked manner.
No victory there.

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

Just wait for Ginsberg's replacement. Grand Wizard of the KKK will fill her position you know.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Hell,it takes longer than three months to get settled in a new house.
And you morons seem to think this country's ills can be repaired in the same amount of time?

 

[Divine Wind]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

He's right that it's essentially useless, however it's been applied to several past President's. Sure, probably a fabricated media thing just like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day are made up to sell more gift cards.

Still, no one complained when it was applied to Clinton, Bush or Obama, so why the conniption now?

The left are mad at Trump because "he has not done what he said he would do".

LOL The Left is mad at Trump because he beat Hillary

 

[boilermaker55]

Bigoted fools like you will revel in that, we know.
But watch out when it comes back and shits in your mouth. Like most everything does.

The supreme court was filled in a crooked manner.
No victory there.

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

Just wait for Ginsberg's replacement. Grand Wizard of the KKK will fill her position you know.

 

[boilermaker55]

Do you need to have someone shove his comments in your face, as to what he would do on day one.
Selective memory again by a teabagger.

Hell,it takes longer than three months to get settled in a new house.
And you morons seem to think this country's ills can be repaired in the same amount of time?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hell,it takes longer than three months to get settled in a new house.
And you morons seem to think this country's ills can be repaired in the same amount of time?

When did you realize it was hard? Day 1 or day 99 after the writing was on the wall?

 

[IResist]

"Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance."

Even though he hated when Obama did it.

"Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way."

You know who else was qualified? Merrick Garland. He was a casualty of playing politics.

If international relations are better, Sweden, Australia and Germany have all been bewildered by how he has acted.

As far as putting economics above the environment and justifying that, we are already the richest country in the world. If one of the roles of the federal government is to protect people, then that includes regulations to insure people breathe clean air and corporations don't pollute.

Trump being slow to fill a lot of positions may not impact my life, but he isn't doing his job either like he should be.

Also, Nunes even said during his press conference that Obama wiretapping Trump did not happen.

View attachment 123410

That's your response? Really? Instead of just debating after I took the time to disagree on some of the points you made?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Do you need to have someone shove his comments in your face, as to what he would do on day one.
Selective memory again by a teabagger.

Hell,it takes longer than three months to get settled in a new house.
And you morons seem to think this country's ills can be repaired in the same amount of time?

Maybe if your moronic activist judges stopped blocking him at every turn when they know damn good and well that their shit wont stand up in a real court of law.

 

[nat4900]

(thanks to him!) and didnt the DOW crash to about 3000?

The Market went up 140% under Obama's tenure......Sorry.....LOL

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump made some disastrous mustakes. He vastly underestimated the viciousness of the democrats. He made a terrible mistake in expecting some level of honesty.

Democrats are not interested in the good of the country. Trump never understood that.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Markets are going up up!

Stock market today: News, data and summary - MSN Money


Compare to when Obama was in office.