President Trump’s First 100 Days by Scott 'Dilbert' Adams

[Weatherman2020]

Hey! He signed a bunch of E.O.'s that's been rejected or told people to study things lol

Hilarious. Leftists rant is now Trump has done nothing to offend them.

every economic disaster of at least 2009/10 was blamed on Bush, but in the meantime,,,Obama was golfing in times of crisis

Obama was blaming Bush for his failures right up until the end.

Obama Blames Bush For Rise Of ISIS [VIDEO]

 

[Weatherman2020]

FDR managed to get 15 major pieces of legislation passed in his first 100 days, including:

Glass-Steagall Act.

FDIC.

Federal Securities Act.

Agricultural Adjustment Act.

Tennessee Valley Authority.

99 Executive Orders.


Trump is amateur hour.

The fact you leftards have your panties wedged in your ass says otherwise.

 

[g5000]

FDR managed to get 15 major pieces of legislation passed in his first 100 days, including:

Glass-Steagall Act.

FDIC.

Federal Securities Act.

Agricultural Adjustment Act.

Tennessee Valley Authority.

99 Executive Orders.


Trump is amateur hour.

The fact you leftards have your panties wedged in your ass says otherwise.

Is this all you have in the face of the truth, Chump?

You look pretty funny just sitting there taking it up the ass from your Fake President.

 

[whitehall]

The last hope for the angry psychotic left is to use their minions in the MSM to try to split the republican party with non stop meaningless drivel disguised as news. Once the Trump administration gets up and running the democrat party becomes a redundant obstructionist speed bump in the political arena.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

The Dow went up 12,000 points under Obama

 

[g5000]

The last hope for the angry psychotic left is to use their minions in the MSM to try to split the republican party with non stop meaningless drivel disguised as news. Once the Trump administration gets up and running the democrat party becomes a redundant obstructionist speed bump in the political arena.

The person who split the GOP was Donald Trump.

The New York limousine liberal came in and slandered every Republican in sight, and then hijacked the party. He's got all of you idiot parroting rubes totally enthralled.

Your morbidly obese emperor is naked and you are averting your eyes to face the facts.

Trump is very fortunate the Democrats are even more dysfunctional than he is. Just like Obama was fortunate the GOP couldn't get its shit together.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

Classic sour grapes. Just classic. Right out of Aesop.

Trump promised all kinds of accomplishments in his first 100 days. He bragged and bragged and bragged about all the great, important, terrific things he was going to do.

And now he's reneged on almost all of them, and you just sit there and take it as he says, "Those grapes are probably sour anyway."

He's counting on you goldfish and your short term memories to forget his colossal failure to keep his promises.

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.

The bolding was by Trump.

Read Trump's 100 day MAGA plan. He has failed to achieve the vast majority of his contract.

16 of the 18 listed were completed, dufus.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

The Dow went up 12,000 points under Obama

Slowest economic recovery in US history - owned by Obama.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump's 100 days could be described as Democrats running around with their fingers in their ears yelling "neener neener neener,"

 

[Weatherman2020]

The last hope for the angry psychotic left is to use their minions in the MSM to try to split the republican party with non stop meaningless drivel disguised as news. Once the Trump administration gets up and running the democrat party becomes a redundant obstructionist speed bump in the political arena.

The person who split the GOP was Donald Trump.

The New York limousine liberal came in and slandered every Republican in sight, and then hijacked the party. He's got all of you idiot parroting rubes totally enthralled.

Your morbidly obese emperor is naked and you are averting your eyes to face the facts.

Trump is very fortunate the Democrats are even more dysfunctional than he is. Just like Obama was fortunate the GOP couldn't get its shit together.

Is that why you hate Trump? He split the GOP and has accomplished nothing?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

The Dow went up 12,000 points under Obama

Slowest economic recovery in US history - owned by Obama.

I wonder what you'll do when Trump fails to hit 3% GDP growth

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Hey! He signed a bunch of E.O.'s that's been rejected or told people to study things lol

Hilarious. Leftists rant is now Trump has done nothing to offend them.

every economic disaster of at least 2009/10 was blamed on Bush, but in the meantime,,,Obama was golfing in times of crisis

Obama was blaming Bush for his failures right up until the end.

Obama Blames Bush For Rise Of ISIS [VIDEO]

even when he passed all of his stones.

 

[g5000]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

Classic sour grapes. Just classic. Right out of Aesop.

Trump promised all kinds of accomplishments in his first 100 days. He bragged and bragged and bragged about all the great, important, terrific things he was going to do.

And now he's reneged on almost all of them, and you just sit there and take it as he says, "Those grapes are probably sour anyway."

He's counting on you goldfish and your short term memories to forget his colossal failure to keep his promises.

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.

The bolding was by Trump.

Read Trump's 100 day MAGA plan. He has failed to achieve the vast majority of his contract.

16 of the 18 listed were completed, dufus.

O'rly?

Show me the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act.

Show me the End the Offshoring Act.

Show me the American Energy and Infrastructure Act.

Show me the School Choice and Education Opportunity Act.

Show me the Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Show me the Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act.

Show me the End Illegal Immigration Act.

Show me the Restoring Community Safety Act.

Show me the Restoring National Security Act.

Show me the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act.

"I will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator." Nope. Didn't happen.

 

[g5000]

And now the Trump Administration wants to implement a tax cut that will massively increase our national debt. They didn't couple it with the reforms that were supposed to come with lower tax rates.

Because the cowardly fucks don't have what it takes to enact real tax reform. They totally chickened out on their original plan. They have completely caved to special interests.

The swamp is more infested than ever.

 

[edward37]

Remember Obama's First 100 days? losing about 700,000 jobs a month (thanks to him!) and didnt the DOW crash to about 3000?

No the DOW crashed under W, and the job losses are W's as well. I love how conservatives take NO responsibility whatsover for W's total screw over of the US economy.

And now the OP is making excuses for the orange-faced clown's dismal first 100 days.

First 100 days of Barack Obama's presidency - Wikipedia

In Obama's first 100 days, he passed and signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and his Stimulus Package was passed on January 29th, 2009 - showing that moment he was Inaugurated he was prepared with legislation that was ready to be implemented. He expanded the S-CHIP program to provide coverage for 4 million working families, and passed a budget resolution for the ACA.

Trump pulled out of TPP, and had his stolen SC nomination approved. The only thing Trump has done since taking office is cancel environmental and worker protections. And bomb and threaten other nations.

What a LOSER!

build a wall? No
HC reform ? No
Immigration ? No
Tax reform ? No
sanctuary cities?? No

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

I lost track of everything he blamed Bush on, but did Obama ever blame Bush on Pearl Harbour?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

Classic sour grapes. Just classic. Right out of Aesop.

Trump promised all kinds of accomplishments in his first 100 days. He bragged and bragged and bragged about all the great, important, terrific things he was going to do.

And now he's reneged on almost all of them, and you just sit there and take it as he says, "Those grapes are probably sour anyway."

He's counting on you goldfish and your short term memories to forget his colossal failure to keep his promises.

https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.

The bolding was by Trump.

Read Trump's 100 day MAGA plan. He has failed to achieve the vast majority of his contract.

16 of the 18 listed were completed, dufus.

O'rly?

Show me the Middle Class Tax Relief and Simplification Act.

Show me the End the Offshoring Act.

Show me the American Energy and Infrastructure Act.

Show me the School Choice and Education Opportunity Act.

Show me the Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Show me the Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act.

Show me the End Illegal Immigration Act.

Show me the Restoring Community Safety Act.

Show me the Restoring National Security Act.

Show me the Clean Up Corruption in Washington Act.

"I will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator." Nope. Didn't happen.

Oh hum.

Trump to Order Oil Drilling Study Off California Coast, Sources Say

Trump signs executive order on H1B visa review — The Indian Panorama

Federal judge blocks Trump order to restrict funding for ‘sanctuary cities’

Trump, Sessions to Target MS-13 Gang and Illegal Immigration

https://www.usnews.com/news/educati...tion-department-to-study-government-overreach

As Trump Readies Sweeping Tax Reform, School Choice Experts Argue Merits of Federal Tax Credit Scholarships

Shall we continue?

 

[Divine Wind]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

He's right that it's essentially useless, however it's been applied to several past President's. Sure, probably a fabricated media thing just like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day are made up to sell more gift cards.

Still, no one complained when it was applied to Clinton, Bush or Obama, so why the conniption now?

 

[boilermaker55]

The supreme court was filled in a crooked manner.
No victory there.

Now that you've failed to do anything in the first 100 days you now determine that it's meaningless. It's like when a bully takes your lunch money and you say you didn't like the schools taco casserole anyway.

DOW began skyrocketing election night, Supreme Court filled, consumer confidence skyrocketing, China going after NK, and he has you leftists in a constant state of tizzy. 3 years, 9 months of more fun ahead.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Pretty much dead on.

Everyone observing politics seems to agree on two things about a president’s first 100 days in office:

1. 100 days is a meaningless, arbitrary marker for a president’s performance that is likely to be more misleading than useful.

and…

2. Let’s treat it like it is important! Reeeeeeee!

The thing that fascinates me the most about this situation is that the so-called “pro-science” people are giving Trump low grades for his first 100 days.

Allow me to connect some dots.

In science, you don’t have much of an experiment unless you have a control case for comparison. For example, you can’t know if a drug helped with a particular disease unless you study the people who didn’t take the drug at the same time as those who did.

But the pro-science people forget this concept when thinking about politics. Where is the control case for Trump’s first 100 days?

Is it George Washington’s first 100 days?

Is it Jimmy Carter’s first 100 days?

And which prior president came to office in 2017 with identical problems and the most polarized political environment in history?

And just how long is it supposed to take to revise Obamacare? Do we compare it to the time Abe Lincoln repealed and replaced Obamacare? Or how about the time those other presidents repealed and replaced Obamacare in the year 2017?

I saw an article in Politico that is too dumb to link to, saying it is objectively true that Trump has had a bad first 100 days. This is a perfect example of what I call the “two movies on one screen effect.” I’m almost certain that many Trump supporters would say these facts are objectively true too:

Economic confidence is up.


Trump signed a bunch of executive orders. You might not like them, but that’s more about you, not about his job performance.


China is putting the screws on North Korea (finally)


Trump erased the “puppet of Putin” charge by prudent application of Tomahawk missiles. That’s an accomplishment, even if you don’t like it.


Trump erased the “Trump is Hitler” hallucination that the Clinton side spray-painted onto him during the election. (That’s a big deal.)


Trump got a qualified Supreme Court judge, albeit the hard way.


Healthcare is moving along briskly from the first plan that was terrible to something that is approaching feasible. That’s progress, not failure.


Tax reform will probably be slower than we want, but most observers expect something good to come of it.


International relations look fine. The only awkward relationship is with Putin, and that’s the awkward relationship Trump’s detractors want.



Illegal immigration is way down because of Trump’s persuasion.


Now let’s look at the things President Trump did wrong in his first 100 days:

You can criticize Trump’s actions against women’s reproductive rights, both on the topic of Planned Parenthood funding and his Supreme Court pick. But calling those things failures or successes depends on your political views, not on Trump’s job performance.

I think you could make an objective case against Trump for putting economics above the environment. But you’d have to ignore the fact that a stronger economy almost always puts you in a better position to keep the environment clean. (Trump says that.) You don’t see clean air and water in poor countries.

President Trump reversed a bunch of campaign statements from impractical positions to more practical ones. Is that failure?

President Trump said a bunch of things that did not pass the fact-checking, surprising literally no one. And as usual, none of it mattered in any way except that it made us focus on whatever topic he wanted us to focus on.

President Trump’s staff and advisors are reportedly doing a lot of in-fighting for influence. But that sounds more like a healthy situation than a Trump-is-dictator situation. It would be worse if there were no differences of opinion in the group.

President Trump has been slow to fill lots of government positions. But has any of that mattered to your life? I haven’t noticed, personally. Was the Secretary of Whatever supposed to come over and mow my lawn?

President Trump did not release his tax returns, so we imagine there are problems there.

President Trump incorrectly claimed that his staff had been “wiretapped.” It turns out that they were only legally surveilled in an indirect way. Which only sounds different to his critics.

Generally speaking, the criticisms of President Trump’s first 100 days (and in general) are based on imaginary stuff:

Imagined problems on his tax returns.

Imagined blackmail by Russia.

Imagined poor performance based on imagining a control case of another imaginary president doing the same job at the same time, but doing it faster.

Imaginary belief that doing things you prefer he not do is similar to not being competent.

Imagined staff problems that are bigger than they are.

Imagined nuclear holocaust that happens because of Trump’s imaginary insanity.

Imagined problems caused by his ignoring of facts that don’t matter.

Imagined future climate calamity. (They could be right, but for now it is imaginary because complex models have a bad track record.)

Scott Adams' Blog

He's right that it's essentially useless, however it's been applied to several past President's. Sure, probably a fabricated media thing just like Mother's Day and Valentine's Day are made up to sell more gift cards.

Still, no one complained when it was applied to Clinton, Bush or Obama, so why the conniption now?

The left are mad at Trump because "he has not done what he said he would do".